Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 03 Mar 2012 (Saturday) 05:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Succulents

 
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Mar 03, 2012 05:30 |  #1

IMAGE: http://www.frogdawg.com/img/s3/v40/p351088714-4.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.frogdawg.co​m/p1005523398/e14ed304​a  (external link)

Have at it. :) Image is a clickable link to larger version on black, clicking that image will give you the largest version your monitor will support.

People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,983 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 03, 2012 09:00 |  #2

Nice. Kind of has an HDR feel to it doesn't it? You might darken the bright green diagonal piece a bit.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpam.pix
Goldmember
1,275 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Apr 2011
     
Mar 03, 2012 09:01 |  #3

OK, here's an attempt of a critique by someone who has 1/200th as many posts as you have.
[Bowing to the master.]

The colors are great. Some might say underexposed, but I like it the way it is.

The central bloom has nice DOF. I'd consider a tighter crop on it because I find the bloom on upper left is also in sharp focus and that competes for my interest...but it's not as interesting and the center bloom. The bloom on the lower left (also in focus) is a bit brighter in its center...that also takes a bit of my attention away from the central bloom.

Some day I hope to have stuff this good to post.
Thanks for sharing and showing us what's possible.

dave


1D-III with stuff to stick on it:
70-200L, 28-70L, 24-105L, 300L, 50, 10-17 fish, 2.0x TC
Image editing OK, encouraged, and expected. Thank you for helping me learn!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmoore323
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
Mar 03, 2012 13:20 |  #4

I agree with cpam, love it but something was bugging, he caught it...

Nice image!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 03, 2012 13:45 |  #5

Wonderful lighting and deeply saturated colors/tones that look so good when saturated. And yet you've maintained the subtle rim colors on the petals (are they petals on succulents?). A classic formal type image that works very well for me.

A couple of things I wish weren't there - that brighter green leaf center right and the brighter red highlight on the far right.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Mar 03, 2012 15:47 |  #6

Thanks for the suggestions, this is the version that is going to show. Clickable link as in previous version.

IMAGE: http://www.frogdawg.com/img/s11/v36/p144829942-4.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.frogdawg.co​m/p802948353/e8a1edf6  (external link)

People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vipergts831
Has the TF retired? Or just being utterly lazy?
Avatar
44,158 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 559
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Taking better shots with an iPhone than MDJAK with a 1DX
     
Mar 03, 2012 17:24 |  #7

Dan i think the last version is a winner. Would look very nice on metallic print :)


-Omar- Flickr (external link) , 5px (external link)
Phaseone 645DF+...because only the best will make up for my lack of skills.
Beginners worry about gear, professionals worry about skill and masters worry about light

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpam.pix
Goldmember
1,275 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Apr 2011
     
Mar 03, 2012 20:13 |  #8

Your second shot shows me that there are two possible directions to take this photo.

1. Concentrate everything on the center bloom and get rid of the other distractions.
2. Improve the "distractions" [By brightening] until they seem to be an integral part of the work.

I think the treatment in #2 is the opposite of the suggestions I gave originally because it went in the other direction. This was also an excellent place to end up.

Good luck with your contest!

Dave


1D-III with stuff to stick on it:
70-200L, 28-70L, 24-105L, 300L, 50, 10-17 fish, 2.0x TC
Image editing OK, encouraged, and expected. Thank you for helping me learn!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimpleJack
Senior Member
Avatar
846 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Washington
     
Mar 03, 2012 20:30 as a reply to  @ cpam.pix's post |  #9

I like the first image the best. To me, it looks like a image I would see in a book or magazine.
The second image kinda looks like rainbow balloons at a Halloween party.


Canon PowerShot S100

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Mar 05, 2012 14:42 |  #10

SimpleJack wrote in post #14017252 (external link)
I like the first image the best. To me, it looks like a image I would see in a book or magazine.
The second image kinda looks like rainbow balloons at a Halloween party.

I'm curious about the radical differences you are seeing between the first picture and the second. The only differences are the removal of the small speckles on the flowers, burning in of the previously suggested items that were too bright and small blur mask around the border to slightly darken and de-emphasize the edges and increase the center brightness by 7%.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 05, 2012 16:15 |  #11

I wouldn't go so far as to relate the second one to rainbow balloons......

but it does look a bit brighter. And more than 7% I think...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImageMogul
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Tennessee
     
Mar 05, 2012 16:17 as a reply to  @ Woolburr's post |  #12

Both as posted by OP. Helps to look at them in "side-by-side".

IMAGE: http://imagemogul.smugmug.com/photos/i-zHpScTD/0/M/i-zHpScTD-M.jpg

IMAGE: http://imagemogul.smugmug.com/photos/i-fg6WLxR/0/M/i-fg6WLxR-M.jpg

Significant contrast difference.

EDIT: Ha! Dave and I were doing the same thing at the same time...

Composition can’t be reduced to a set of rules ... Dissonance has its place in photography as well as music. If we confined ourselves to major and minor scales, the blues wouldn’t exist. Rules are tools, not laws.” ~ James Martin
http://www.imagemogul.​smugmug.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Mar 05, 2012 22:40 |  #13

Dave....it is probably 14%....the slider is at 50 for no enhancement.....49 would darken it....I went to 57....


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 05, 2012 23:39 |  #14

I would guess it's not a linear scale....the center of those succulents is considerably brighter on the re-edit. Some of them are actually blown in small areas.

What did you edit it in?


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Mar 06, 2012 00:03 |  #15

Edited in PSE9 using some homegrown creative sidecars.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,678 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Succulents
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1399 guests, 147 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.