My EOS 60D has the capability to do three shot burst AE brackets of up to +/- 3.0EV. I think that -3EV, 0EV, and +3EV shots are likely to handle most contrast situations I might encounter, unless I am trying to photograph a black cat in a coal bin with the direct sun in the frame.
However, a 3EV step size seems pretty coarse to me. I think the resulting combined HDR image would be smoother with smaller steps and more exposures.
I have the latest Magic Lantern installed on my camera, and with that you can do up to 9 exposure brackets with up to 5EV step size. That is an enormous contrast range, (probably enough to shoot out of the south end of a northbound black cat in a coal bin with the core of the sun in the frame) but again 5EV steps seem kind of absurd.
I am thinking something like 5 exposures with 2EV steps (total -4EV to +4EV), or 7 exposures with 1.5EV steps (total -4.5 to +4.5EV) for more smoothness, or even 9 exposures with 1EV steps for even more (but maybe unnecessary) smoothness. With 9 exposures, a lot of stuff can move during the sequence, making deghosting a challenge unless the scene is dead calm, so I would rather not use so many exposures if they aren't necessary.
I'm curious to hear what some of the experienced folks here would prefer to use. What size EV steps are desirable? In the absence of further guidance, 5 shots of +/- 2EV steps seems adequate to me. Of course I know that all of this depends on the scene and that there is no hard and fast rule that covers every situation.
I own a couple Magic Lantern dvds, but did not know there was camera software.


