Been using 3 for about a year and starting to feel comfortable, do I need to upgrade? Is it that much better? BUT if I don't upgrade to 4 can I upgrade to 6 when it comes out?
ralff Senior Member 766 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Asheville NC More info | Mar 06, 2012 05:42 | #1 Been using 3 for about a year and starting to feel comfortable, do I need to upgrade? Is it that much better? BUT if I don't upgrade to 4 can I upgrade to 6 when it comes out? Canon 6D - Canon 7D - gripped, Canon 50D - gripped, EFS10-22mm, 17-40 f4 L, nifty-fifty, EF 28-135mm IS, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS USM, Tokina AT-X 100mm f/2.8 ProD Macro, Benbo Trekker, Feisol 3371 w/ Kirk BH-3 ball head - Epson Pic-Mate, Epson 2200, Epson 3880
LOG IN TO REPLY |
iLvision Cream of the Crop 5,766 posts Joined Oct 2011 Location: Western pot hole city, Massachusetts More info | Mar 06, 2012 05:47 | #2 |
Staszek Goldmember 3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Mar 06, 2012 05:50 | #3 I'm happy with LR3 and probably won't jump to LR4. There are some nice new features in LR4, but I doubt I would touch them (GPS tracking, Book module via Blurb Books only, and some finer adjustment brush options). SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tommykjensen Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 06, 2012 05:53 | #4 Staszek wrote in post #14034045 Adobe offers an upgrade to CS5.5 from CS3 or CS4, so I'd assume when LR5 comes out, you can upgrade from LR3 as well. Don't assume they will stick to that. They wanted to change the upgrade policy for CS6 so that you had to have CS5 in order to elligable for the upgrade but they changed / postponed that after massive protests. EDITING OF MY PHOTOS IS NOT ALLOWED
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rusty.jg Senior Member 855 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cornwall, UK More info | Mar 06, 2012 06:01 | #5 I really dont know at the moment. All I can find thats new is some changes to highlight/shadow recovery, location based organisation and some video editing (oh and something about creating a photo book as well?? - surely the myriads of online services will have this covered if not beat). to be OR NOT to be = 1 (which is "to be" so that one's cleared up at last
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAl007 Cream of the Crop 8,118 posts Gallery: 556 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1681 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK. More info | Mar 06, 2012 08:02 | #6 I was most of the way through a 30 LR3.6 trial coming from CS3 using ACR/PS, when I downloaded the LR4 Beta. The improvement from ACR6.4 to the converter in 3.6 was stunning, going back over old shots (RAW & some JPG's from a 300D) I might have had a camera upgrade from the improvements in LR3.6. The improvement from 3.6 to 4 Beta was almost as good again! Images that I had given up getting a usable result from in ACR6.4 now became quite usable and with very little work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ghpatriot Goldmember 1,310 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2009 Location: Grand Haven, Michigan U.S.S.A. More info | Mar 06, 2012 08:10 | #7 In my opinion LR4 is worth the 79 upgrade and I did so already. Adobe switched its process version to 2012 from 2010 and I can say there is a noticeable difference. Its new algorythms really do a better job of pushing pixels around just like the difference from LR2 process version of 2003 to LR3's 2010. The clarity slider doesn't totally destroy photos now either. Using the new highlights and shadows sliders I can now increase the dynamic range better than with LR3. I've found that I can hold highlights of a wedding dress and shadows of a tux better in a couple of tests that I have done. Noise reduction is the same in LR4. Also LR4 has tons of controls when using the adjustment brush and the graduated filter like the ability to adjust color temperature, tint, exposure, contrast, clarity, highlights, shadows, saturation, sharpness, and noise. The tone curve panel now has a RGB adjustment mode so you and adjust channels separately as well. Also, the chromatic aberration correction feature has been greatly improved and simplified as well. It's now a simple check box in the Lens Correction pannel and it does seem to work alot better I must admit, I could never get LR3 to work quite the way I wanted for removing CA. 2 x 5D III | 40D | Rokinon 14 2.8 | 35L | 50[B]L | 85IIL | 100 L |135L | 300 f4L | | 24-70L | | 70-200 2.8L II | 2XL |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dharrisphotog Goldmember 2,331 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Mar 06, 2012 08:58 | #8 |
rusty.jg Senior Member 855 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cornwall, UK More info | Mar 06, 2012 09:20 | #9 I must admit I knew nothing of the "process version", what it is or what it does. However after the last few comments I have been studying. It does appear to be a significant upgrade to version 2012. I didnt realise it went so far into the whole workings of lightroom and the way RAWs are converted/tweaked. Its now looking more like a decent upgrade. Why isn't this stuff plastered all over Adobes site rather than having to dig it out of various review sites? to be OR NOT to be = 1 (which is "to be" so that one's cleared up at last
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 06, 2012 09:26 | #10 gh patriot wrote in post #14034428 In my opinion LR4 is worth the 79 upgrade and I did so already. Adobe switched its process version to 2012 from 2010 and I can say there is a noticeable difference. Its new algorythms really do a better job of pushing pixels around just like the difference from LR2 process version of 2003 to LR3's 2010. The clarity slider doesn't totally destroy photos now either. Using the new highlights and shadows sliders I can now increase the dynamic range better than with LR3. +1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeteGl Senior Member 421 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Eccles, Nr Manchester, England More info | Mar 06, 2012 09:37 | #11 Anybody know when it'll be released? Fuji X-T30 Body, XF18-55 F2.8-4 R LM OIS, XF55-200 F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonK Goldmember 2,161 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2004 Location: PA USA More info | Mar 06, 2012 09:40 | #13 rusty.jg wrote in post #14034811 I must admit I knew nothing of the "process version", what it is or what it does. However after the last few comments I have been studying. It does appear to be a significant upgrade to version 2012. I didnt realise it went so far into the whole workings of lightroom and the way RAWs are converted/tweaked. Its now looking more like a decent upgrade. Why isn't this stuff plastered all over Adobes site rather than having to dig it out of various review sites? Can you expand on what the "2012 process" is? I bought the upgrade, but want to see where the biggest improvements are by eye and by knowledge. 7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ghpatriot Goldmember 1,310 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jan 2009 Location: Grand Haven, Michigan U.S.S.A. More info | Mar 06, 2012 09:41 | #14 http://www.photoshopuser.com/lightroom4 2 x 5D III | 40D | Rokinon 14 2.8 | 35L | 50[B]L | 85IIL | 100 L |135L | 300 f4L | | 24-70L | | 70-200 2.8L II | 2XL |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DunnoWhen Goldmember 1,748 posts Likes: 16 Joined Mar 2006 Location: South Wales More info | If you decide to download it, watch out for the VAT amount. My wisdom is learned from the experience of others.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1408 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||