It takes way too long to edit. Thank goodness for clone and healing brush...but this was still hard. Always watch her hair...and lens flares too.
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Mar 06, 2012 16:31 | #1 It takes way too long to edit. Thank goodness for clone and healing brush...but this was still hard. Always watch her hair...and lens flares too. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jonwhite Goldmember 1,279 posts Joined Jan 2007 More info | Mar 06, 2012 16:48 | #2 Yup its a good point and a nice recovery of the offending photo! Wedding Portfolio Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form THREAD STARTER "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Mar 06, 2012 16:55 | #3 This photo was almost ruined by her hair. It isn't the first time that has happened in photos, and I have thrown away some because of that. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jaggman Hatchling 3 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 06, 2012 17:31 | #4 Oh WOW! Those are some stunning photos. flaring does matter... Jaggman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Arman'sPhotography Senior Member 663 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Milton, Ontario More info | Nice image. Yes you are absolutely right with the topic. It is better to prevent it and make sure the shot is perfect, I hate being 1h on a pic. Toronto Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spb Senior Member 583 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: NH More info | Mar 09, 2012 08:26 | #6 the worst thing is to try to do it in Lightroom. ugh x_x 60d | 50d | grip | 11-16 2.8 | 17-55 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 24-105 | 70-200 II | 60 macro | 580EXII x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherStevenb Goldmember 3,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada More info | Mar 09, 2012 10:50 | #7 Great photo, Joey. I just had to pop into this thread to ask how you created the atmospherics here (white cloudy occlusions). Dangle a cotton-ball mobile in front of the lens ? haha. Or is this just pure flare weirdness ? It looks great either way and absolutely supports the mood of the content of the image.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RedTiePhotography Goldmember 3,575 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: San Diego More info | Mar 09, 2012 10:57 | #8 Christopher Steven b wrote in post #14056270 Great photo, Joey. I just had to pop into this thread to ask how you created the atmospherics here (white cloudy occlusions). Dangle a cotton-ball mobile in front of the lens ? haha. Or is this just pure flare weirdness ? It looks great either way and absolutely supports the mood of the content of the image. edit: a closer inspection makes me suspect pure flare + rain drops on the lens. My guess is he was shooting through some sort of white flowers/plants. Bryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
spb Senior Member 583 posts Joined Nov 2009 Location: NH More info | Mar 09, 2012 10:59 | #9 ^ my guess would be that some object in the front like bushes etc. would like to know as well 60d | 50d | grip | 11-16 2.8 | 17-55 2.8 | 50 1.4 | 24-105 | 70-200 II | 60 macro | 580EXII x2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form THREAD STARTER "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Mar 09, 2012 12:04 | #10 Trees are in blossom, shot through blooms (fruitless cherry-type). Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Mar 09, 2012 15:47 | #11 Good recovery! Yeah, hair up the nose isn't the most flattering thing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form THREAD STARTER "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Mar 09, 2012 15:58 | #12 Tsk...oh well, won't be noticeable in 99% of prints because of contrast and small detail, plus eyes writing things off. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Mar 09, 2012 16:51 | #13 form wrote in post #14057983 Tsk...oh well, won't be noticeable in 99% of prints because of contrast and small detail, plus eyes writing things off. Yeah, you are right. It's hardly noticeable. But it's there. Nothing a quick stroke in PS wouldn't fix, but no biggie, and again, nice recovery.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form THREAD STARTER "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Mar 10, 2012 09:04 | #14 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1590 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||