I know a newer better camera will be out by then, but who thinks the mark iii will still be a competent camera like the 5D classic is. If you think about it that way, the price tag isn't quite so terrible, especially if it comes down in price some over the next year. buying it and keeping it, would come out just as cheap as buying a 60D now and then buying the next xxD body 2 or 3 years from now. If im thinking correct the the 20D was out when the 5D was released. Can this be justified as a buy once, cry once scenario, or am I just trying to justify an overpriced camera?