Thank you for that answer.
I'm assuming that you've actually used Arca Swiss, Acratech, Markins (and the rest) and done your comparisons? Of course you have - you couldn't know how much better RRS was than them without having done that. Never mind.
RandyS Goldmember 1,046 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Minnesota More info | Mar 16, 2012 09:51 | #16 Thank you for that answer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Mar 16, 2012 09:57 | #17 RRS top of the line stuff. Kirk if looking for cheaper stuff. Have Markins M10. No problem at all using 500mm f4 IS and 1dmk2 on it. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gakoenig Senior Member 427 posts Joined Feb 2010 Location: Portland, OR More info | Mar 16, 2012 10:08 | #18 I'm assuming that you've actually used Arca Swiss, Acratech, Markins (and the rest) and done your comparisons? Of course you have - you couldn't know how much better RRS was than them without having done that. Never mind. Well, I do make camera accessories for a living... It would make sense that I might have some experience with other accessory manufacturer's products. http://lu.ma
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Mar 16, 2012 11:09 | #19 gakoenig wrote in post #14095302 When it comes to buying any camera gear, if RRS is an option, RRS is the answer. Amen to that. EXCEPT when it comes to ballheads. The Markins are stronger, lighter, smaller and cheaper and more aesthetically pleasing if I do say so myself. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IndecentExposure Goldmember 3,402 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Austin, Texas More info | Mar 16, 2012 13:14 | #20 Despite the BH-55 being over half a decade old it's still the champion of shear head locking ability according to comprehensive ballhead comparisions and tests. (The most comprehensive still available might be this one gakoenig wrote in post #14096791 (Except for camera straps. If they ever make one, I'm going to need to amend that line...)
ben_r_ wrote in post #14097203 Amen to that. EXCEPT when it comes to ballheads. The Markins are stronger, lighter, smaller and cheaper and more aesthetically pleasing if I do say so myself. Are you saying you just like the traditional Linhoff (I think they were the first with it) design over other styles, because aesthetically the Markins seems no different than 4 out of every 5 other ballhead designs - Kirk, Besel, Jusino, Giottos, HorrusBennu, Triopo, Slik, Fancier, Novoflex, Joby, Arca-Swiss, Induro, Benro, etc, etc. All have ballheads that would be hard to distinguish from 5 feet away. - James -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Mar 16, 2012 15:02 | #21 Indecent Exposure wrote in post #14097892 Despite the BH-55 being over half a decade old it's still the champion of shear head locking ability according to comprehensive ballhead comparisions and tests. (The most comprehensive still available might be this one If you want lighter, RRS doesn't have what you are looking for. If you want camera locking ability that would require force on a tectonic scale to budge, RRS is the king of the hill. ![]() Are you saying you just like the traditional Linhoff (I think they were the first with it) design over other styles, because aesthetically the Markins seems no different than 4 out of every 5 other ballhead designs - Kirk, Besel, Jusino, Giottos, HorrusBennu, Triopo, Slik, Fancier, Novoflex, Joby, Arca-Swiss, Induro, Benro, etc, etc. All have ballheads that would be hard to distinguish from 5 feet away. ? Im saying based on specs, price, internet product images and user reviews I think Markins is the way to go in this current market. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Mar 16, 2012 15:09 | #22 Top of the line ballhead, I will say RRS, no questions asked. But Markins is pretty good, smaller and lighter. Kirk and other way lower IMHO particularly when we talking supporting big superteles. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phoenixkh a mere speck More info | Mar 16, 2012 15:30 | #23 James, Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IndecentExposure Goldmember 3,402 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Austin, Texas More info | Mar 16, 2012 15:47 | #24 Phoenixkh wrote in post #14098846 James, I was surprised that my Manfrotto 468 MG hydrostatic head came in first in that linked test, however with the RC4 plates not my RC2 plates. It's nowhere near the quality of either the RRS or Markins, I fear, but it works for me with my G12 and all the stuff to which it is attached or is attached to it. I loved the Manfrotto 460Mg but it just couldn't handle the weight with a flash and rotating flash bracket added on. One day, I'll get a DSLR and upgrade my tripod setup as well. That will be fun. Kim For the price it's hard to beat and you could do a lot worse, that's for darn sure. Like you, it was a (pleasant) surprise to me. - James -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2485 guests, 97 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||