Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Motorsports 
Thread started 15 Mar 2012 (Thursday) 21:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is the 70-200 generally enough?

 
mcap1972
Member
Avatar
171 posts
Likes: 68
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
     
Apr 08, 2012 13:52 |  #16

Great shots. Thanks.


Avangard Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sharpstat
Senior Member
Avatar
323 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Pasadena,CA.U.S.A.
     
Apr 19, 2012 12:29 |  #17

dinanm3atl wrote in post #14196290 (external link)
Usually good enough for more standard panning work but if you want the 'in your face' tele photo compression style shot you will want 400-500 IMO.

I found that out the hard way at Laguna Seca in 2010 shooting MotoGP. I was setting up to shoot in turn 5 using my 70-200 with a 1.4 extender and noticed a lot of other photographers with at least a 300-400mm in that turn. The next time I shoot there again I will rent a 400-500. I talked to a couple of Pro guys while there and they were shooting with 500-600mm for the "tighter framed" in your face shots that people enjoy today.


V.Sharp
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dennis ­ Valet
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Apr 22, 2012 21:33 as a reply to  @ Sharpstat's post |  #18

If you want to get head on shots, or shots at the apex (shooting from outside of the turn) it's generally not even close to enough for track shooting. I have a 100-400mm and I find it most of the time all the way out at 400mm on a crop body (7D).

If you are on the inside of a turn, a shorter lens is perfect, but when on the outside of a turn....length is what you need




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,691 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Is the 70-200 generally enough?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Motorsports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2528 guests, 86 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.