Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 16 Mar 2012 (Friday) 18:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sanyo eneloop AA batteries

 
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Mar 17, 2012 20:30 |  #16

Bob_A wrote in post #14103101 (external link)
LOL good point! I'm talking about eneloops. I thought Mark1 was also.

Yes the Eneloops. They are about half dead after a week. I bought a battery tested just to prove to my self I am not crazy. They are strong enough to run the flash for a few quick grabs of the kids.... But even then they recycle so slow. I finally threw then out a few weeks ago. So far I am having better luck with some cheap Rayovacs I needed in a hurry.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blackzarg
Member
158 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Mar 18, 2012 23:22 |  #17

I use Eneloops and Rayovac Hybrids - I haven't been in a situation where the recycle time affect my shooting, but I do replace them after a month or so. There's a huge thread on battery testing somewhere here...


Canon 60D | Sigma 30mm f1.4 | Canon 55-250mm f4-5.6 | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Canon 50mm f1.8 II
Flash: YN465 | RF602 Triggers
Other Stuff: Gorillapod SLR-Zoom w/ Manfrotto 484RC2 | Other tripods and ballheads

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Mar 19, 2012 15:29 as a reply to  @ blackzarg's post |  #18

I have not done any head-to-head testing but, it appears that the Eneloops recharge faster than alkaline batteries.

I recharge them with the supplied slow rechager. From what I have read, the quick chargers don't work well with the Eneloop batteries.

In fact I have purchased a second charger since recharging more than one set of batteries is such a slow process.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Mar 19, 2012 15:33 |  #19
bannedPermanent ban

RPCrowe wrote in post #14114575 (external link)
I have not done any head-to-head testing but, it appears that the Eneloops recharge faster than alkaline batteries.

I recharge them with the supplied slow rechager. From what I have read, the quick chargers don't work well with the Eneloop batteries.

In fact I have purchased a second charger since recharging more than one set of batteries is such a slow process.

Charge faster than alkaline? I sure hope that alkaline doesn't recharge at all




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joayne
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,439 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 3912
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Stuck@Coachella
     
Mar 19, 2012 15:36 |  #20

Mark1 wrote in post #14104793 (external link)
Yes the Eneloops. They are about half dead after a week. I bought a battery tested just to prove to my self I am not crazy. They are strong enough to run the flash for a few quick grabs of the kids.... But even then they recycle so slow. I finally threw then out a few weeks ago. So far I am having better luck with some cheap Rayovacs I needed in a hurry.

Wow, that has not been my experience. I have several sets and they often sit for weeks without use. Every time I have popped them into the flash units (430 and 580) they work like a charm.. and I don't have a complaint about recycle time, as they seem faster that any other battery that I have used. They also last much longer (more pops) than any battery I have used.

Perhaps something happened with yours ..


joayne Contribute to POTN | Worldwide Photo Week

Please Quote the post to which you are responding.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BradJohnsen
Member
Avatar
83 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Mar 19, 2012 15:38 |  #21

Eneloops for my PW's, and Powerex's for my 580exii's. I based my decision on this thread, which I'm surprised nobody's posted yet... https://photography-on-the.net …677074&highligh​t=eneloops


5Dmkii / 50D
10-22 / 17-40L / 24-70L / 50 1.4 / 70-200L 2.8 IS / 85L / 100 macro / 135L / 400 5.6L
580exii x2 / 430ex / PW x6 / AB1600 x1 / AB800 x2 / ABR800 x1
http://bradjohnsen.com (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/206photog/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OneJZsupra
Goldmember
Avatar
2,378 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Guam
     
Mar 19, 2012 18:37 |  #22

BradJohnsen wrote in post #14114625 (external link)
Eneloops for my PW's, and Powerex's for my 580exii's. I based my decision on this thread, which I'm surprised nobody's posted yet... https://photography-on-the.net …677074&highligh​t=eneloops

I think that's because the guy that made the thread was posting here. I need to get some powerex's. How much faster is the cycle rate of those compared to eneloops?


Gear List | Feed Back | My Site (external link)
YN RF-603 O-ring solution


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldvultureface
Goldmember
Avatar
4,279 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 386
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Indiana USA
     
Mar 19, 2012 18:59 |  #23

seoul4korea wrote in post #14115484 (external link)
How much faster is the cycle rate of those compared to eneloops?

The recycle time will be almost identical. The mAh rating doesn't affect recycle time, only the number of flashes produced. You've got a bigger water bucket with the higher mAh batteries, but the drain hole at the bottom is virtually the same size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OneJZsupra
Goldmember
Avatar
2,378 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Guam
     
Mar 19, 2012 19:06 |  #24

oldvultureface wrote in post #14115596 (external link)
The recycle time will be almost identical. The mAh rating doesn't affect recycle time, only the number of flashes produced. You've got a bigger water bucket with the higher mAh batteries, but the drain hole at the bottom is virtually the same size.

OK so you mean powerex has MORE pops per battery but drains faster over time
and the eneloop has less pops per battery with drains slower over time


Gear List | Feed Back | My Site (external link)
YN RF-603 O-ring solution


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattmus4357
Member
Avatar
118 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Northwest Arkansas
     
Mar 19, 2012 19:50 |  #25

I run Eneloops in anything that requires AA or AAA batteries, including flashes. I love them and they've never failed me.


Gripped Canon EOS 60D | Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS | Canon 430EX II | Zoom H4n | GoPro HD Hero

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldvultureface
Goldmember
Avatar
4,279 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 386
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Indiana USA
     
Mar 19, 2012 20:00 |  #26

seoul4korea wrote in post #14115636 (external link)
OK so you mean powerex has MORE pops per battery but drains faster over time
and the eneloop has less pops per battery with drains slower over time

I meant that the ability to deliver current to charge the flashes' capacitor is about the same, i.e., recycle time for the flash will be similar regardless of the mAh rating.

Your statement above is accurate. Eneloop batteries won't give as many flashes but they will still be useful in a couple of months when the higher capacity batteries have lost their charge. But if you use the higher capacity in a short period of time (and charge them before each outing), the 2700 mAh batteries are a better choice.

I'll take twenty flash pictures one day and it may be a month before the flash gets used again. So in my case, eneloop batteries are better for me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SYS
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,716 posts
Gallery: 602 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 48476
Joined Jul 2004
Location: Gilligan's Island
     
Mar 19, 2012 20:04 |  #27

seoul4korea wrote in post #14115484 (external link)
I think that's because the guy that made the thread was posting here. I need to get some powerex's. How much faster is the cycle rate of those compared to eneloops?

According to that guy's tests, up to first 100 pops or so both Powerex 2700 and eneloop's recycle time is about the same. Longer it goes, however, Powerex 2700 can sustain the recycle time a whole lot better than eneloop.



"Life is short, art is long..."
-Goethe
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Keyan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,319 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 78
Joined Mar 2011
     
Mar 19, 2012 20:10 |  #28

I just got a set of the new Eneloop XX, haven't really run them through any good tests yet.

http://www.amazon.com …ef=oh_o01_s00_i​00_details (external link)

I have several sets of regular eneloops and use them in my flashes and other things like Xbox controllers, which they are excellent in.

I have had no problems with them so far.


Cameras: 7D2, S100
Lenses: 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM, 18-135 STM, 24-70 f/4L IS USM, 50 f/1.4 USM,70-300L IS USM
Other Stuff: 430 EX II, Luma Labs Loop 3, CamRanger

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Mar 19, 2012 20:13 |  #29

I moved to a 15 minute charger a while ago. Because of the eneloops that I had being so short lived. I had to.... Charging them for 4-5 hours each set.... and I have 5 flashes to feed.... I would be there for days ahead charging them all. So I went to a 15min and could do it in several hours.

I know that it is not that "good" for the bateries. But I know of some that have been used for years with no detriment to the battery either in holding the charge or duration while in use. But I also dont try to wring out every last charge that I can. One set of rechargeables pays for it self with about 3 charges. After that, it is all a bonus. So I dont mind dumping them when they cant keep up any longer.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldvultureface
Goldmember
Avatar
4,279 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 386
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Indiana USA
     
Mar 19, 2012 20:19 |  #30

SYS wrote in post #14115974 (external link)
Longer it goes, however, Powerex 2700 can sustain the recycle time a whole lot better than eneloop.

Good point. That's where the higher capacity comes into play.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,927 views & 0 likes for this thread, 27 members have posted to it.
Sanyo eneloop AA batteries
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1108 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.