SunTsu: Can't say I'm in the least surprised! Just look at the details page for the batteries: the strapline at the top (ie the 'grab-their-attention' bit) says 3100mAh then immediately below it refers to 2900mAh. So even the makers don't know what they can do.
I have actually come across these elsewhere, which I can't find now (isn't that always the way!), and the full claim was '3100mAh, 1800mAh minimum'. Top-of-the-range names like Powerex and Sanyo usually show a drop of 100mAh between the headline value and their minimum. I think there's a bit of a clue there, don't you. Makers putting stuff out with their own name on it, makers with world-wide reputations to defend, show more modest maxima and only slightly lower minima and other brands claim the sun, the moon and the stars. Hmmmm.
This is most emphatically not any form of criticism but a genuine enquiry. I can't understand why anyone would spend so much on a top of the line flash unit and then possibly compromise the purchase with 'so-so' power cells. (Yes, I did notice that the cells came with the flash units - as I said, no criticism implied.) Just curious as to the rationale, is all.
SJRobbins: Yes they're very pretty but what with my arthritis and everything else, I just can't manage the wrist action and the gait which goes with this degree of ★bling★ any more. (Thank goodness
) However, if my keeper will let me, I might crayon on the white ones.
="RichSoansPhotos"]I am seriously giving up on the Uniross batteries, they seem to age a lot quicker
Yup, my experience exactly. Big name, small performance. Do you remember 'Dusty Bin' on TV? Well there you have some food for it. (For non-UK readers, it was a rather puerile TV game show featuring an anthropomorphised trash can. Hey, I did say it was puerile!)
They're the same new model Eneloops, just far more spangly 
- very good and still portable. I especially like the charger power pack arrangement - very neat for when we nip over the Channel visiting

