Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Mar 2012 (Friday) 21:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Strange reflections with 35mm f/2

 
short_wave
Senior Member
Avatar
674 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Jan 2011
Location: DFW
     
Mar 16, 2012 21:25 |  #1

Hello Everyone!

I just got the 35mm f/2 yesterday and so far I really like the lens! I was doing some test shots around the house and shot this photo of my son. I then noticed this strange reflection in the shot (from the wreath at the top of the stairs). At the time of this shot, I had a Tiffen 52mm UV filter attached. I then discovered that this reflection is only produced when the subject is extremely backlit. I then removed the filter and the reflections were gone. Is this phenomenon due to the design of the glass and its interaction with the UV filter?

I like to have filters on simply for the added protection but I don't think this will be possible with this lens. Anyone else had this experience?

SOOC

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7190/6988655957_565e356116_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jaybeefoto/6988​655957/  (external link)

Feedback
www.john-benitez.com
insta: @johnbenitez

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Mar 16, 2012 21:28 |  #2

A high quality, multi-coated filter will minimize such reflections. Or just don't use a filter. I don't.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Deep
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 965
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Upstate NY
     
Mar 16, 2012 21:46 |  #3

Lose the filter.


mikedeep.com (external link) - rocket launch photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3429
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Mar 16, 2012 21:48 |  #4

tiffens are about the worst filters you can put on a lens...see if it works as a coaster for your beer...if not...toss it


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
short_wave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
674 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Jan 2011
Location: DFW
     
Mar 16, 2012 21:48 |  #5

Thanks mike_d. I'm leaning towards not using the filter, I just like the added protection. But I do have the lens hood so that should be good.

Thanks to everyone else. Now I know why people don't like Tiffen filters! :)


Feedback
www.john-benitez.com
insta: @johnbenitez

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,474 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1078
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Mar 16, 2012 21:59 as a reply to  @ short_wave's post |  #6

I have protection filter on my 35F2, not UV, they are useless on digital cameras.
I also have Tiffen polarizer, works perfectly.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 17, 2012 00:37 |  #7

Protection from what? It is $400 lens. Spend $10 per yr and get some insurance if you so worried. Is the camera protected in some way?


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
short_wave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
674 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Jan 2011
Location: DFW
     
Mar 17, 2012 01:04 |  #8

Protection from people and the elements. This will also help resale value since most people care about the condition of the glass when buying used. I could stand a nick/scratch on my camera body but not on the lens, especially if it is deep.

What are you implying about the cost? That it's a "cheap-o" lens?


Feedback
www.john-benitez.com
insta: @johnbenitez

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Deep
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 965
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Upstate NY
     
Mar 17, 2012 01:10 |  #9

Guys, let's skip the filter debate, just once? Please?

Here's all that needs to be said on the subject: If you must use a filter, use a high quality one.


mikedeep.com (external link) - rocket launch photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
short_wave
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
674 posts
Likes: 54
Joined Jan 2011
Location: DFW
     
Mar 17, 2012 01:14 |  #10

Mike Deep wrote in post #14101328 (external link)
Guys, let's skip the filter debate, just once? Please?

Here's all that needs to be said on the subject: If you must use a filter, use a high quality one.

Noted. I will start looking into better quality filters. Thanks Mike!


Feedback
www.john-benitez.com
insta: @johnbenitez

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bananapie
Senior Member
Avatar
522 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Seattle, Biloxi, Waco
     
Mar 17, 2012 02:34 |  #11

If you ride in the back of a jeep snapping pictures on a dirt road on the move...or in a sandstorm...then buy a nice filter. If not bare + lens hood is going to be much better protection...especiall​y if you drop it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bananapie
Senior Member
Avatar
522 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Seattle, Biloxi, Waco
     
Mar 17, 2012 02:53 |  #12

Mike Deep wrote in post #14101328 (external link)
Guys, let's skip the filter debate, just once? Please?

Here's all that needs to be said on the subject: If you must use a filter, use a high quality one.

:cool:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricardo222
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,067 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 266
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
     
Mar 17, 2012 03:01 |  #13

Mike Deep wrote in post #14101328 (external link)
Guys, let's skip the filter debate, just once? Please?

Here's all that needs to be said on the subject: If you must use a filter, use a high quality one.

Absolutely. I use filters most of the time as I'm in and out of the shipyard next door where sharp sandblasting dust and paint overspray are in the air a lot. So far I have only had to replace one filter, but that is a small price to pay.


Growing old disgracefully!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Mar 17, 2012 16:00 |  #14

Ricardo222 wrote in post #14101536 (external link)
Absolutely. I use filters most of the time as I'm in and out of the shipyard next door where sharp sandblasting dust and paint overspray are in the air a lot. So far I have only had to replace one filter, but that is a small price to pay.

If you shoot in that env then fine. But I am guessing you don't and probably don't walk around with no caps on your lenses.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricardo222
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,067 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 266
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
     
Mar 17, 2012 16:09 |  #15

bobbyz wrote in post #14103831 (external link)
If you shoot in that env then fine. But I am guessing you don't and probably don't walk around with no caps on your lenses.

Hell no! And hoods! Like most practical people I consider my photographic equipment to be tools, not jewels. But also, like most practical people, I know that tools need to be well looked after to give their best. Sharp chisels and saws, clean lenses...etc.

It doesn't take long to remove a filter to do my landscape work, and the sight of that pristine glass under the filter reassures me that at least the camera can do it's job properly...even if the guy driving it doesn't always get it right.

The only point to this discussion about filters, and it IS relevant to the OP's question, is that our equipment should be such that it can do the best job possible for us at all time, so sometimes filters are appropriate, sometimes they are not. But at least, they should always be the best filter we can afford.


Growing old disgracefully!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,781 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Strange reflections with 35mm f/2
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1108 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.