Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 17 Mar 2012 (Saturday) 06:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tripods Alloy VS Carbon Fiber

 
No ­ One
Senior Member
372 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Philippines
     
Mar 17, 2012 06:01 |  #1

In regards to tripods,aside from carbon fiber tripods being lighter than the ones made of alloy,what else are their advantages?When it comes to being more sturdy,which is better,the tripods made of carbon fiber or alloy?
Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Mar 17, 2012 07:19 |  #2

Apparently carbon is better at damping vibration. I say apparently because I might just be being led up the garden path by marketing rubbish.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
argyle
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,187 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2007
Location: DFW, Texas
     
Mar 17, 2012 07:47 as a reply to  @ Lowner's post |  #3

A lot depends on the tripod and how its made. CF is lighter and is also better at attenuating vibrations. CF is pretty tough and won't corrode or rot. Generally, the legs aren't the problem...its the other mechanical components (spider, leg locks, etc) that are the problem. For example, a spider that has been machined from a solid piece of metal is better than a spider that has been formed as a casting...castings can have internal, unseen voids that can weaken and fail it over time. Just depends on the brand and how its manufactured.

If you're a hiker and concerned about weight, then CF is the way to go. If not, save yourself some money and go with an aluminum tripod. But one thing is for sure...once the "novelty" of using a tripod wears off, the heavier tripod is more apt to be left behind. But if you're serious about your photography, a tripod of any type is a must.


"Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer

GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyS
Goldmember
Avatar
1,046 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Minnesota
     
Mar 17, 2012 07:48 |  #4

Lowner wrote in post #14101983 (external link)
Apparently carbon is better at damping vibration. I say apparently because I might just be being led up the garden path by marketing rubbish.

You're not being led up any path, but good on you to call it out without your own experience to work from.

I've set up both alloy (older mid-large size Bogen/Manfroto) and carbon (light-mid size "freds-carbon-r-us") legs next to each other. While not at all scientific, it takes very little effort with a telephoto to see how long the alloy legs 'ring' if you cause a vibration in them vs. the carbon. Several times as long.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Mar 17, 2012 10:28 |  #5

CF is lighter and more expensive, but can be very stable. Weight is the issue with metal sticks. In the studio, an aluminum Manfrotto can't be beat for price and everything else. In the field, CF is king because of low weight.

Manfrotto makes the best metal sticks, IMHO. CF tripods are a mix, I think that Gitzo, RRS and Feisol lead the way here.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 17, 2012 10:55 |  #6

Alloy is cheaper, and not a lot heavier if you stay away from the mega big tripods. Testing has shown carbon dampens vibrations better, how much this matters to most of us is a personal call. I think my CF fiber tripod feels more sturdy than my last alloy tripod.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luciddreamer
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: NE Indiana
     
Mar 17, 2012 11:22 |  #7

Or you could go wood for the best vibration dampening and lighter than alloys.


materialism ~
preoccupation with or emphasis on material objects, comforts, and considerations, with a disinterest in or rejection of spiritual, intellectual, or cultural values.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Simon_Gardner
Goldmember
Avatar
1,307 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Twitter @Simon_Gardner
     
Mar 17, 2012 14:05 |  #8

luciddreamer wrote in post #14102784 (external link)
Or you could go wood for the best vibration dampening and lighter than alloys.
IMAGE: http://i754.photobucket.com/albums/xx181/Simon_Gardner/clappy.gif

@Simon_Gardner | Since 27 Nov 1987 | Tripod fetishist - moi?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bcd01
Goldmember
Avatar
2,429 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
     
Mar 17, 2012 14:40 |  #9

Pound for pound, CF is more rigid that aluminum. If the two tripods were of equal weight, the CF would be much more rigid or inflexible. I have both and I prefer the CF beause the legs do not flex like the aluminum does.


bcd01 - devices of enjoyment list :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FNH
Member
79 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Mar 17, 2012 14:49 |  #10

When you guys say alloy, are you talking about Aluminum? alloy just means assorted metals mixed together.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Mar 17, 2012 15:29 |  #11

FNH wrote in post #14103563 (external link)
When you guys say alloy, are you talking about Aluminum? alloy just means assorted metals mixed together.

I think the OP is talking about aluminum.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 17, 2012 17:16 |  #12

Probably is; technically almost anything of aluminium is an alloy (likewise with steel) since pure aluminium would be altogether too soft to survive in the "wilds". However, he could also be admitting the possibility of brass, bronze, magnesium or titanium tripods in the event anyone were able to locate such beasties. A Mg or Ti-alloy tripod would probably be able to take the weight per load title, but would cost the earth. I think there have been a few Mg-alloy tripods though.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phrasikleia
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: Based in California and Slovenia
     
Mar 17, 2012 17:26 |  #13

Carbon fiber is also a lot nicer to handle in the cold. Aluminum legs can be downright frigid if they don't have padded legwarmers on them.


Photography by Erin Babnik (external link) | Newsletter (external link) | Photo Cascadia Team Member (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
No ­ One
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
372 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Philippines
     
Mar 17, 2012 23:59 |  #14

tvphotog wrote in post #14103703 (external link)
I think the OP is talking about aluminum.

I am the OP here.I actually meant magnesium alloy.How does it compare to carbon fiber tripods?
Thanks.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Mar 18, 2012 05:11 |  #15

No One wrote in post #14105520 (external link)
I am the OP here.I actually meant magnesium alloy.How does it compare to carbon fiber tripods?
Thanks.

Alloy, aluminium, magnesium alloy, its all different descriptions of the same "metal" tripod.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

19,664 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it.
Tripods Alloy VS Carbon Fiber
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2285 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.