Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 22 Mar 2012 (Thursday) 15:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I think I need a faster card

 
calypsob
Goldmember
Avatar
1,179 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Lynchburg Virginia
     
Mar 22, 2012 15:28 |  #1

When I first purchased my T3i I said to myself that I would never need some insanely expensive san disk extreme pro memory card. Recently I realized that I have found limitations to my t3i in its buffer capabilities. I have been doing HDR panoramas and HDR macro focus stacking, which as you may know takes up a ton of buffering space. If I take a regular HDR shot with Magic Lantern at the maximum of 9 exposures the camera will fly through the first 6 shots and then struggle to accomplish the last 3 shots on my san disk HC card. When I make a macro focus stack I hit the same problem only it really sucks then because the focus stack could be anywhere between 25 and 60 shots. It is very difficult to shoot a bug when the camera bogs down at 6 shots during a focus stack and because of this I have not successfully completed a satisfactory HDR focus stack yet, but I am trying. Anyways I am thinking about getting an 8 gb San disk extreme pro and I was wondering if anyone on here can vouch for me in this situation. Any improvement could be a matter of capturing a shot all together but if its a gimmick, or it will not help my buffer situation to upgrade please let me know. I wish that canon would incorporate larger buffers in their cameras, like maybe 1-2 gigs of RAM, I know that the technology is there.


Wes
-----------
flickr (external link)
Gear: Many gears Yes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kethnguy
Member
196 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Mar 22, 2012 16:49 |  #2

if i remember correctly, cards dont increase your buffer, just the time it takes to clear your buffer.

from the amount of shots you're getting (approx 6) i'd say you're shooting raw and 6 is about the maximum buffer capacity on the t3i


Canon 50D Gripped || 24-105 F4 L || 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calypsob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,179 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Lynchburg Virginia
     
Mar 23, 2012 00:08 |  #3

So in theory could a faster card clear the buffer before it can reach 6 shots?


Wes
-----------
flickr (external link)
Gear: Many gears Yes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kethnguy
Member
196 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Mar 23, 2012 01:16 |  #4

calypsob wrote in post #14137079 (external link)
So in theory could a faster card clear the buffer before it can reach 6 shots?

i dont think so, the camera shoots until the buffer is full and then it clears the buffer. I dont think there are cards fast enough to clear the buffer almost instantaneously. right now the only way that i can think of is upgrading your camera but thats not exactly a cost effective method :confused:


Canon 50D Gripped || 24-105 F4 L || 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Crimzon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,279 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 405
Joined May 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Mar 23, 2012 01:36 |  #5

Its the camera itself. I borrowed a friend of mine's expensive high speed card, made no difference.

Try shooting with a rebel XS! I think mine is 1.5 FPS shooting RAW and the buffer fills in 3 shots. Your T3i is blazing fast compared to mine. From your side it's complaining about shortfalls, but when I hear your speeds, I'm thinking "Damn! if only mine was that fast!"

I can almost use an old lever action film camera faster. :lol: ok maybe not, but it sure feels like that sometimes. Especially when someone shoots near me with a pro model, and it's like an Uzi, compared to a revolver.


I can get faster with JPG, but for me the trade off isn't worth it.


My blog (external link)

Always feel free to provide constructive criticism to any of my pics.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 23, 2012 01:40 |  #6

Unless you have a very old card I would suspect you are limited by the processing speed of the camera. And that should be a factor of how much data you are moving to the card.

Are you shooting raw or jpg? Can you shoot jpg and lower the size? The specs say 3.7 fps up to 34 for large jpg. That should be nearly a 10 second run. Raw is 11 shots or 3 seconds.

But then, it could just be late and my mind has already gone to bed.

Upgrade to a 7D...


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Mar 23, 2012 12:29 |  #7

I doubt the card will do anything. I just got sent a Sandisk 16gb Extreme 45mb/s card by mistake (ordered 30mb/s), and my 450D bogs down just the same as using slower cards.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calypsob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,179 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Lynchburg Virginia
     
Mar 26, 2012 01:34 |  #8

Hmm I am starting to see the advantage of the 7d. Unfortunately I wont be able to swing the price for a while. To bad looks like I'm at the mercy of the wind for now.


Wes
-----------
flickr (external link)
Gear: Many gears Yes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Foggiest
Senior Member
584 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2012
     
Mar 26, 2012 03:45 as a reply to  @ calypsob's post |  #9

Well the Canon site states :
"Maximum Burst
JPEG (Large/Fine): approx. 34

RAW: approx. 6

RAW+JPEG (Large/Fine): approx. 3

* The number of possible shots and maximum burst apply to a 4GB card based on Canon's testing standards.

* The image file size, number of possible shots, and maximum burst will vary depending on the shooting conditions (3:2 aspect ratio, subject, memory card brand, ISO speed, Picture Style, Custom Functions, etc.)."




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Mar 26, 2012 09:01 |  #10

calypsob wrote in post #14154007 (external link)
Hmm I am starting to see the advantage of the 7d. Unfortunately I wont be able to swing the price for a while. To bad looks like I'm at the mercy of the wind for now.

I have never investigated Magic Lantern but my initial check shows that the 7D is not and probably never will be supported.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calypsob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,179 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Lynchburg Virginia
     
Mar 27, 2012 02:49 |  #11

Titus213 wrote in post #14155128 (external link)
I have never investigated Magic Lantern but my initial check shows that the 7D is not and probably never will be supported.

Good point. In that case I may have to wait and see what the future has in store.


Wes
-----------
flickr (external link)
Gear: Many gears Yes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dachness
Senior Member
298 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Hawaii
     
Mar 27, 2012 03:59 |  #12

Sirrith wrote in post #14139796 (external link)
I doubt the card will do anything. I just got sent a Sandisk 16gb Extreme 45mb/s card by mistake (ordered 30mb/s), and my 450D bogs down just the same as using slower cards.

It was not a mistake. Sandisk upgraded all of their lower end cards and retailers haven't updates their product pages yet. Ultra's are now 30MB/sec, Extreme/HD Video are now 45MB/sec.

In most cases a faster card won't make much of a difference unless your card is performing extremely poor.

You could consider upgrading to a 60D for $640 plus tax via Canon loyalty program. It can do 15 raw in the buffer and clears the buffer in about 22 seconds.


Daniel
60D |10-18 f/4.5-5.6 IS STM | Σ 17-50 f/2.8 OS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,628 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
I think I need a faster card
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2552 guests, 91 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.