Recently, my canon 420ex flash has been firing approximately one second after the master (either 580EXII or MX-14) has fired. Slave and flash are set to channel 1 and group C. what am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance
bifocalod Hatchling 3 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Tucson, AZ More info | Mar 22, 2012 18:54 | #1 Recently, my canon 420ex flash has been firing approximately one second after the master (either 580EXII or MX-14) has fired. Slave and flash are set to channel 1 and group C. what am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohuntrshane Member 36 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Arizona More info | Mar 22, 2012 20:19 | #2 Hopefully someone will reply, I have the same problem. Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2012 10:28 | #3 My 550ex starts to do that as slave to 580ex sometimes - usually after working fine for 20-40 shots - definitely couldnt be overheating, as i dont shoot that fast...... hopefully we can figure this one out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alduin Senior Member 915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Lehigh Valley, PA More info | Apr 07, 2012 10:32 | #4 Something related to second curtain flash, maybe? 7D+BG-E7 | 5D | G9 | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400L IS | 10-22mm | 50mm f/1.4 | 580EX II | 430EX II | YN565EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2012 11:15 | #5 alduin wrote in post #14225267 Something related to second curtain flash, maybe? Nope ! double checked that already.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
msowsun "approx 8mm" More info | Apr 07, 2012 11:50 | #6 starlights wrote in post #14225427 Nope ! double checked that already. Everything will work just fine initially with perfect wireless ETTL exposures, and the later the slave will start to behave erratic and fire approx 0 .5 to 1 second later - and the pulse seems kind of weak - but if i set it to manual, it fires normal. (The batteries are normal, and sometimes even when connected to the canon power pack - so couldn't be weak batteries either) Do you mean setting the camera to manual mode? The 420EX has no manual mode. Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 07, 2012 12:39 | #7 msowsun wrote in post #14225577 Do you mean setting the camera to manual mode? The 420EX has no manual mode. starlights wrote in post #14225254 My 550ex starts to do that as slave to 580ex sometimes - usually after working fine for 20-40 shots - definitely couldnt be overheating, as i dont shoot that fast...... hopefully we can figure this one out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
msowsun "approx 8mm" More info | Apr 07, 2012 12:58 | #8 The only thing I can think of is that the Canon wireless system incorporates a test function that will fire each slave with a delay just as you describe. Maybe it is the master that is causing the problem? Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alduin Senior Member 915 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Lehigh Valley, PA More info | Apr 07, 2012 13:46 | #9 Gah, yes! Put it in group B and see if the delay is a little shorter. 7D+BG-E7 | 5D | G9 | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400L IS | 10-22mm | 50mm f/1.4 | 580EX II | 430EX II | YN565EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2475 guests, 95 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||