Post your in camera HDRs here!
I'm waiting for a 5D3 to come in stock and I'll post mine too.
HiggsBoson Goldmember 1,958 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Texas Hill Country More info | Mar 23, 2012 17:09 | #1 Post your in camera HDRs here! A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shazza Senior Member 486 posts Likes: 36 Joined May 2008 Location: Arizona and Florida More info | Mar 24, 2012 11:25 | #2 None to post yet, but I will say it takes some playing around. Metering in the right area obviously has a big effect. Definitely see potential for some fun. Sharon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PeterWem Senior Member  270 posts Likes: 9 Joined May 2007 Location: Skåne, Sweden More info | Downloaded DPP 3.11.10. I belive the HDR-function in DPP is the same as in the camera. Looks nice. Seems like every change from the raw file moving over to the HDR-file.  Image hosted by forum (587437) © PeterWem [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DocFluty Goldmember  1,762 posts Likes: 37 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Gulfport, Ms More info | Mar 30, 2012 02:42 | #4 Interesting.. id like to see more examples please. My Facebook Fan Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hmongstang Senior Member  371 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2005 Location: stockton,ca More info | Apr 03, 2012 01:25 | #5 PeterWem wrote in post #14154551  Downloaded DPP 3.11.10. I belive the HDR-function in DPP is the same as in the camera. Looks nice. Seems like every change from the raw file moving over to the HDR-file. Using my laptop screen, so tell me if the image is too dark. From 5Dc.
20d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bikeboynate Goldmember  3,127 posts Joined Aug 2011 Location: San Francisco More info | Apr 03, 2012 01:42 | #6 IMO the in camera HDR JPEGs that the MkIII create aren't all that great, but it's better than nothing. Here's one I took on the first day I had mine. This was out at the Marin Headlands. This is the JPEG straight out of the camera (albeit downsized)  Image hosted by forum (588783) © bikeboynate [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. -Nate
LOG IN TO REPLY |
halitime Goldmember  1,271 posts Likes: 19 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Lantzville B.C. Can. More info | Apr 03, 2012 02:44 | #7 I'm downloading 3.11.10 right now so I'll post back on how it goes. Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shazza Senior Member 486 posts Likes: 36 Joined May 2008 Location: Arizona and Florida More info | Apr 03, 2012 10:01 | #8 A few examples - the first is the in-camera HDR - Natural Setting, the second is the same 3 jpegs processed in Photomatix using default enhancer settings.   The in-camera version is almost identical to the middle exposure - bringing out little detail in the shadows or clouds.   Not a great example, but you can see the in-camera HDR does not do much with the interior/shadow area. Going to Art Standard brings out more of the shadow area, but begins to give a very unnatural look to the photo. Note - the photomatix version would be further processed to make it more natural, just thought it would be more helpful to show the default version. With higher dynamic range scenes, the in-camera HDR does little to "blend" the images - something like True HDR on the iPhone seems to do a much better job. In most cases, I've found the HDR image is not much different from the 0EV exposure unless you step up the scale HDR processing scale to the more extreme settings which look quite unnatural. Sharon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HiggsBoson THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,958 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Texas Hill Country More info | Dec 17, 2012 08:00 | #9 what other bodies do this besides 5D3? A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135
LOG IN TO REPLY |
deleted
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2013 09:01 | #11 T4i does it too Brupikk - Brazil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 16, 2013 17:41 | #12 Not impressed by results with in-camera HDR. Maybe it's just me, but HDR generated from same raw files used in-camera to come up with HDR image used with Photomatix are MUCH better. The concept of in-camera HDR is appealing, but maybe I need to spend more time figuring out the settings. On the other hand, Photomatix always does a good job for me, so why bother?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 767 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
