I normally compress files using a certain program, however it doesn't compress .mov files
. What're some programs used to compress .mov files? Thanks in advance.
ampeed Member 37 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 23, 2012 17:10 | #1 I normally compress files using a certain program, however it doesn't compress .mov files
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Photo99 Senior Member 539 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: Fort Worth, TX More info | Mar 24, 2012 01:27 | #2 I use final cut using "export using quick time conversion"480x270 hope this helps.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
invertz3 Member 42 posts Joined Mar 2012 Location: SoCal 909/951 More info | Mar 24, 2012 02:34 | #3 I use AVS video converter. Current Body-Canon EOS rebel t3i/600d with Meike battery grip
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Anke "that rump shot is just adorable" UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009 30,454 posts Likes: 3 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK More info | Mar 24, 2012 02:41 | #4 Do you mean compress them to make the file size smaller for emailing? Like zip files? Anke
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Mar 24, 2012 12:17 | #5 Handbrake. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mr.Freedom.45 Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Handbrake is good, but the correct way to do it is transfer the videos from your camera to the hard drive and then open them in the video editing software and do whatever you want to do to that video to make it better and then let the editing software do the compressing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2012 18:13 | #7 Mr. Freedom .45 wrote in post #14145693 Handbrake is good, but the correct way to do it is transfer the videos from your camera to the hard drive and then open them in the video editing software and do whatever you want to do to that video to make it better and then let the editing software do the compressing. Actually, I was thinking about this. Editing the clips/movies (what ever term you like) in Sony Vegas and then saving the file. I can't remember but it does convert it in to a different file in which I can compress entirely, correct?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mr.Freedom.45 Mostly Lurking 13 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 25, 2012 02:29 | #8 ampeed wrote in post #14146808 Actually, I was thinking about this. Editing the clips/movies (what ever term you like) in Sony Vegas and then saving the file. I can't remember but it does convert it in to a different file in which I can compress entirely, correct? Yes and the editing softwares have lots of different setting to choose when saving the file.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2012 14:28 | #9 Mr. Freedom .45 wrote in post #14148594 Yes and the editing softwares have lots of different setting to choose when saving the file. Thought so. Its been about 2 years
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BoysClub Member 30 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 25, 2012 17:34 | #10 The best/fastest method I've used is Quicktime Pro 7. It's actually faster than Compressor and FCP.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Mar 25, 2012 19:24 | #11 I don't understand that at all. Handbrake is free and will do that plus it has many presets. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BoysClub Member 30 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Mar 27, 2012 10:57 | #12 Tony-S wrote in post #14152276 I don't understand that at all. Handbrake is free and will do that plus it has many presets. Preference, I guess. I don't like handbrake because it's slow and I don't see any use for presets because they're often not the best quality you could be getting. QT Pro has given me the best image quality of the bunch, and it's fastest.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Mar 27, 2012 12:06 | #13 BoysClub wrote in post #14162423 Preference, I guess. I don't like handbrake because it's slow and I don't see any use for presets because they're often not the best quality you could be getting. QT Pro has given me the best image quality of the bunch, and it's fastest. This is not my experience. On my 12-core Mac Pro, Handbrake uses all 12 cores and hyperthreading, while QT Pro only uses 4 cores and no hyperthreading. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeblack2022 Goldmember 3,005 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2011 Location: The Great White North More info | Mar 27, 2012 16:55 | #14 ampeed wrote in post #14141506 What're some programs used to compress .mov files? Thanks in advance. What do you intend to do with the files? Post on YouTube, etc.? Joel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 27, 2012 22:01 | #15 joeblack2022 wrote in post #14164396 What do you intend to do with the files? Post on YouTube, etc.? vimeo and youtube. Why do you ask?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is vinceisvisual 888 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||