So many knowledgeable people here with so much experience with so much equipment. I want to take advantage of it and get some help with a new lens purchase.
I am looking at the Sigma 28-70 2.8 EX DG, Sigma 24-135 2.8-4.5, and the Canon 28-135 3.5-4.5 IS USM.
Here's my situation. I shoot people and landscapes mostly. I like the reach of the 28-135, and I particularly like the IS feature on the 28-135 Canon. My priorities (in order) are: sharpness, range (focal length, hence the reason for favoring the 135 length) and aperture. I already have a long zoom and have the longer focal lengths covered, but I like having a lens with the range of the 28-135. I have used the Canon IS 28-135 and I think it is a very good lens with good sharpness. The IS feature works well. The Sigma 24-135 has the same range but no IS nor is it EX. It does have some Aspherical and SLD lens elements though. Is it reasonable to expect that the Canon IS will be generally sharper than that lens? And the big question, does the the Sigma 28-70 EX DG have a level of sharpness that trumps them both? If the consensus is that the Sigma 28-70 EX DG has sharpness considerably better than the Canon IS 28-135 and the Sigma 24-135 I would give up the range for the sharpness. If it's more or less marginal, then I wouldn't.
I know that lens buying is 75% personal needs and preference, but I'm looking for help with the other 25%. Your experience and opinions are appreciated.


