Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 30 Mar 2012 (Friday) 12:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My first sport picture

 
mike3767
Member
242 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
Mar 30, 2012 12:00 |  #1

Here is my first attempt at baseball and sports in general. I will say that the 5d mkII is not made for fast focusing. Anyways, let me know what you think. I think it needs to be brightened up a bit. It was a cloudy day with storms on the horizon. I think the 5d and the 100-400L was a good match and had great reach.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/03/5/LQ_588148.jpg
Image hosted by forum (588148) © mike3767 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 5D MKII, TS-E 17Lmm, 100Lmm Macro,24-70Lmm, 70-200LIImm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rivas8409
Goldmember
Avatar
2,500 posts
Likes: 586
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Lemoore, California
     
Mar 30, 2012 12:54 |  #2

Looks underexposed (you know that already though) and the WB looks like it's a little off. His white pants don't quite look white. There's too much room above his head compared to below his feet. It's cropped WAY too close to his cleats. I think a portrait orientation would work better for this photo the way it is. There's too much space to either side.

I think better composition would be to crop the left of the frame just enough to get rid of the yellow foul pole and try straightening it a bit. That would get your "rule of 3rds" incorporated and make for a more visually pleasing sport shot...I think.

I will give you this though, nice focus and good DOF on this one! I'd love to see the next few frames (assuming you were shooting in continuous shots mode) to get a glipse of the ball he's about to pitch.


Body: Canon 5DmkII│Canon M50
Glass: Tamron 35mm f/1.4│Canon 85mm f/1.8│Canon 24-105mm f/4L│Canon 135mm f/2L│Canon EF-M 22mm f/2.0
Lights: Flashpoint XPLOR 400PRO│Flashpoint Streaklight 360│Flashpoint Zoom Li-on│AB800
Results: WEBSITE (external link)FACEBOOK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,363 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 286
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Mar 30, 2012 13:19 |  #3

I agree that it's under-exposed. You didn't need 1/2000 shutter speed for this shot. If you'd dropped it to 1/1000 you would have upped the exposure by a stop while still keeping a pretty fast shutter speed for when he went through his full pitching motion. In metering this shot I probably would have spot metered off the grass then raised the exposure by a stop or so (for a true ETTR you would raise it as high as possible without blowing out the details in the brightest area of the scene, which would probably be his uniform). I also agree with rivas8409 that the composition could be stronger. His advice to place the pitcher in the left third of the image frame would increase the perceived space through which the ball will be traveling toward the batter and thereby give the image a more dynamic look. I'm not sure about the white balance - the pants may not have been a true "white" to start with, although on an overcast day things will tend to be pretty "bluish".


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club https://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MarkTyler
Member
35 posts
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Forney, Tx
     
Mar 30, 2012 15:53 |  #4

portrait orientation, more exposure, get closer, dont chop off feet


Without dark, there is no light. Without expression, there is no art.
1D MkIV | 17-40L | 24-105L | 70-200L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixil ­ Studio
Goldmember
Avatar
1,270 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Denver
     
Apr 01, 2012 14:55 |  #5

since he is not moving away or toward you why not "trap focus" or manual focus.


Denver wedding and event photographer (external link)
My photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,205 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
My first sport picture
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
493 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.