Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 31 Mar 2012 (Saturday) 09:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Questions on FoCal AF Micro Adjustment Calibration

 
mrmarks
Senior Member
822 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2010
     
Mar 31, 2012 09:40 |  #1

How reliable and accurate is FoCal? How easy is it to do the calibration setup? Which is recommended - Focal Plus or Focal Pro? I am currently using this method http://www.northlight-images.co.uk …s3_af_micoadjus​tment.html (external link) and wonder if the FoCal is worth it? Thanks for the inputs




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdalrt
Goldmember
Avatar
1,766 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 972
Joined Aug 2008
Location: The Great White North
     
Mar 31, 2012 10:23 |  #2

I use FoCal Pro. Very easy to setup and use and a great time saver. I have 4 bodies and 8 lenses. I was able to MA all of them in a day doing multiple trials with each body and lens.

I have noticed an improvement in the sharpness of my pics since doing the MA. So, for me it was definitely worth it.


Just Sports Photographyexternal link
My Junk ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrmarks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
822 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2010
     
Mar 31, 2012 10:28 |  #3

rdalrt, do you need to change the distance between the chart and the camera according to the focal length? Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdalrt
Goldmember
Avatar
1,766 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 972
Joined Aug 2008
Location: The Great White North
     
Mar 31, 2012 10:35 |  #4

Well, you don't have to, but it is recommended to use the 50x focal length rule. I just started with the shortest focal length lenses and kept backing up as I went. The distance doesn't have to be exact. Or you can even use the distance you usually shoot a lens at.


Just Sports Photographyexternal link
My Junk ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrmarks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
822 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2010
     
Mar 31, 2012 10:41 |  #5

I see a few different chart types for FoCal. How do you use them?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrsforums
Goldmember
1,249 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Cary (Raleigh), NC, USA
     
Mar 31, 2012 10:54 |  #6

mrmarks wrote in post #14186090 (external link)
I see a few different chart types for FoCal. How do you use them?

Suggest you read the instructions...


John

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
similae
Senior Member
Avatar
254 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Finland
     
Mar 31, 2012 13:16 |  #7

I have the semi-automatic version, and I would recommend getting at least the PLUS-version. In my opinion semi-automatic has no advantages over doing it manually with normal printed test chart. My results were the same (which is good) and took the same amount of time to achieve it in both ways.

I'm only disappointed I went for the cheaper version, wrong place to save! (again.. ;) )


Mikko
6D, EF 50 f/1.4, EF 200mm f/2.8 L II, Nissin Di622 Mark II
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Apr 01, 2012 05:52 |  #8

  • Version? Plus or Pro. Like Mikko says, fully automatic really is worth the extra.
  • Target? A suitable target for you to print out is included in the package. I stuck mine to some foam-core board for stability.
  • Distance? I started with my 300mm + 2xTC and put the target across the garden. Only 20x focal length, but it was all I could manage. As I went down in focal length I moved the target (mounted on a second tripod) closer.

Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
avan
Senior Member
Avatar
512 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Montreal,quebec
     
Sep 25, 2012 10:12 |  #9

similae wrote in post #14186675 (external link)
I have the semi-automatic version, and I would recommend getting at least the PLUS-version. In my opinion semi-automatic has no advantages over doing it manually with normal printed test chart. My results were the same (which is good) and took the same amount of time to achieve it in both ways.

I'm only disappointed I went for the cheaper version, wrong place to save! (again.. ;) )

I know it's late, but good to know:

From Raikan Focal site:

Can I upgrade?

Of course. There is no upgrade fee other than the price difference between the versions. So, for example, if you purchase a license for the Standard version, and after using it you decide you would like to upgrade to the Pro version, you simply pay the difference and Reikan will supply you with a new license enabling the Pro version features.

You can do this from our License Management System.


1DMK4, T6s, 100-400mmL IS II, 16-35mm f4, 100mm macro
[www.pbase.com/jeelee/g​alleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,848 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Questions on FoCal AF Micro Adjustment Calibration
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1470 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.