Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 02 Apr 2012 (Monday) 10:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Should I jump on this 1Dmk4 or wait?

 
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
6,257 posts
Gallery: 147 photos
Likes: 5041
Joined Oct 2010
     
Apr 03, 2012 01:18 |  #16

mellofelow wrote in post #14200589 (external link)
Hey guys... check my math, but there's no crop/reach advantage for the 1D4. Image of 5D3 at 22.3 cropped to APS-H = 17.2. Therefore, it still out-pixel 1D4's 16.1 - pretty even I'd say.

That's not what I'm getting.
For example, put a 200mm lens on the 1D4, that gives the same fov as if you put a 260mm lens on a FF camera, such as the 5D3 (200 x 1.3 = 260).

Now, take a shot with the 5D3 and 200mm. How much would the image have to be cropped so that it looks like a 260mm lens was used?

260/200 = 1.3, and 1.3 squared = 1.69 22.3mp/1.69 = 13.2mp

You're left with a 13mp image, not 17.


When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
When you see my photos you'll know that I'm not.

My best aviation photos (external link)
My flickr albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EmaginePixel
Goldmember
Avatar
1,946 posts
Likes: 43
Joined Sep 2008
Location: So Cal
     
Apr 03, 2012 01:53 |  #17

Perfectly Frank wrote in post #14200989 (external link)
260/200 = 1.3, and 1.3 squared = 1.69 22.3mp/1.69 = 13.2mp

You're left with a 13mp image, not 17.

Why 1.3 squared?


"Yesterday is history. Tomorrow is a mystery. Today is a gift. That’s why its called the present” - Kung Fu Panda
EmaginePixel.com website (external link) ----- SportsShooter profile (external link) ----- Facebook page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Apr 03, 2012 04:14 |  #18

2nd hand value of the 1D MK4 will go up after 1D X is released in my view, unless the 1D X is so good the crop factor becomes irrelevant, but still people will still not pay the extra for the reach


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thelightofsound
Goldmember
Avatar
1,399 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta
     
Apr 03, 2012 07:43 |  #19

here is an email i got from denis reggie:

Denis Reggie is offering two of his Canon 1D Mark IV cameras for sale just in time for the upcoming wedding season at only $3,999 each. These beauties are shipped in original boxes and hard to tell from brand new. Each is in perfect working order and recently cleaned and calibrated by Canon.

The camera bodies (lenses not included) have reliably served Denis and team during their short lives of only 11 to 16 months of light-to-moderate use... each is in superb condition with years of reliable service in their future.

Why are these 10+ frames-per-second, 12,800+ ISO capable cameras being sold? The Reggie team is moving to the new 5D Mark III system for the coming wedding season and want common batteries and camera controls for all of their gear.

Cameras are offered with 6 month warranty via Canon's ultra-fast Platinum CPS factory service to be back on the job within days.


--atlanta photographer michael saba (external link) - music photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cicopo
Goldmember
Avatar
3,702 posts
Gallery: 248 photos
Likes: 1389
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Canada
     
Apr 03, 2012 08:02 |  #20

I did the math using the areas of each sensor to get ratios. If a FF sensor is 864 sq mm, a 1.3 sensor is 548 sq mm & the 1.6 sensor is 337 sq mm then that gives the

1.3 .6344% as many pixels as the FF sensor or about 14 Mpixels (not all are usable because it takes the full sensor size into account & camera specs show that plus a lower number as usable.

1.6 sensor yields .39% which comes out as 8.58 Mpixels (which in actual fact yields a bit less too).

Therefore the 5D3 will have roughly 13.5 Mpix vs the 16 Mpix of the 1D4.


A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Apr 03, 2012 10:41 |  #21

MaDProFF wrote in post #14201293 (external link)
2nd hand value of the 1D MK4 will go up after 1D X is released in my view, unless the 1D X is so good the crop factor becomes irrelevant, but still people will still not pay the extra for the reach



New camera comes out, the old one goes down in used value.

There are a LOT more uses for the camera other than shooting birds...


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zigot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
602 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Ottawa Ontario CAN
     
Apr 04, 2012 09:34 |  #22

kevindar wrote in post #14199686 (external link)
I would not. the adantages actually would be f8 autofocus, built, and fps. the reach advantage is very small, as the 5d3 has 13.2 for the area cropped to 1d4 sensor vs 16. If you really want to add reach, keep the 7d. would sell 5d2, unless you do weddings/events, and want 2 FF bodies.

For sure I will get the 5D3 but would wait a bit for the price to go down.

umphotography wrote in post #14199757 (external link)
If your going to get a 5D3,, an MKIV--5D3 would be an awesome combo. In addition to what nick already mentioned, MKIV has a 300K rated shutter and its built like a tank. 5D3 and MKIV images are virtually identical up to 12000 ISO...no one will be able to tell which camera took the shots if you compared an MKIV and a 5D3 side by side. Anyone that says they can is wishful thinking.

So its really in your corner to make a decision. The more i use mine, the more i would never part with it. After seeing Nicks reviews and others on the 5D3, its the combo im leaning towards. I was going to hold out for the 1Dx, but the 5D3 look very good and files from the MKIV exceed my expectations. 5D3 files are virtually identical so now that its has a great AF system, its really personal choice which way to go.......Both will do an outstanding job. Looks like either camera is a winner from my point of view. The build of the MKIV is difficult to beat. By the time you factor a grip (if you use them) there is going to be about a 1000.00 difference in price for a new one.

OP. The one your looking at is like new. 500 clicks is nothing.....your looking at a 400.00 difference. If you offer him $4100.00 hes going to take it. Refirbs from canon,, If you can get one,, are 3900.00 from canon. The one i got had 297 on the shutter count.

The 1Dmk4 + 5D3 would be my dream combi.
I still love my 7D but just want to get better AF and better high ISO. 7D needs a lot of PP to get decent IQ.
Probably I will end up getting it but then, new camera with new technology will be out by that time.

nyc2sd wrote in post #14200480 (external link)
I just picked up a low shutter count mark iv with an extra LP-e4 and the remainder of a three year Mack warranty for $3400. Prices are coming down. I also came from a 7d and the image quality is truly amazing!

That's an awesome deal if the body is in minty condition.
And I am looking for a really good/minty condition body as I plan to keep it for a long time.

MaDProFF wrote in post #14201293 (external link)
2nd hand value of the 1D MK4 will go up after 1D X is released in my view, unless the 1D X is so good the crop factor becomes irrelevant, but still people will still not pay the extra for the reach

There will be more 1Dmk4 on the market so the price will go down.


7D2, 5Diii, 5Div, 70-300L, 24-105L, 70-200Lii, 100-400Lii, 135L, 430EXii, 580EXii, Σ50, Σ60-600 Σ150 Macro, ΣEM-140, LensBaby 3G, White lightnings, Bowens. Gear - feedbacks


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Apr 04, 2012 10:02 |  #23

People will not sell 1D MK4s to replace with a 1D X, it is the 5D's and Ds's they will replace, remember it is the end of the line at present for the 1.3 crop, my view is they will hold their price and may even go up when it is not available new on the 2nd hand market.

As good as the new 5D Mk3 is, people love that 1 series wow factor


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfectly ­ Frank
I'm too sexy for my lens
6,257 posts
Gallery: 147 photos
Likes: 5041
Joined Oct 2010
     
Apr 04, 2012 19:00 |  #24

mellofelow wrote in post #14201047 (external link)
Why 1.3 squared?

Sorry, I should have explained. Here's an intuitive approach...

An image taken with the 5D3 has dimensions h (height) and w (width), and contains 22mp.
In terms of area, there are 22mp spread out over an area of h x w. So the number of pixels per unit area is 22mp/hw. This will be the same for a cropped image, also.

The ratio of 260mm to 200mm is 1.3 (260/200). This means that if an image taken with the 200mm is cropped until an object in it appears to be the same size as if a 260mm were used, then each side of the image would have to be reduced by 1.3

So the cropped image will have dimensions of (h/1.3) x (w/1.3) and will produce a new cropped area of hw/1.69 (1.3 squared) Since the pixels per unit area is still 22mp/hw, the number of pixels the cropped image contains is (hw/1.69) x 22mp/hw = 13mp. Of course, software will take this 13mp image and enlage it until it becomes h x w in size, but it will still remain a 13mp image.


When you see my camera gear you'll think I'm a pro.
When you see my photos you'll know that I'm not.

My best aviation photos (external link)
My flickr albums (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GrillZ
Member
Avatar
246 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Margate, FL
     
Apr 04, 2012 20:52 |  #25

I wouldn't do more than $3900 for a 1D4. "almost new" or not.... they go for $3400-$3900 on eBay all day long....of course depending on the shutter count and cosmetic cond.... a 1D4 with 50k SA's or less is still a baby....


www.1stClassVisuals.co​m (external link)
5D MK III | Canon 70-200L IS II | Canon 16-35L II | Canon 1.4x Extender II | 2x AB800's + 1xABR800 | 4x Cactus V5 Triggers | + More coming soon!
My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
actprivate
Senior Member
Avatar
499 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Australia
     
Apr 04, 2012 21:25 |  #26

Call me crazy, but as a hoarder, I like to keep outstanding items. From the look of it, 1D4 will be the last APS-H 1D camera and this makes it special because it is the most refined product in that line. Surely better and better 1D (or other pro level designations) will come, but IMO 1D4 will hold its place. This point is besides the comments others rightly said about 1D4's strengths.

I feel the same with 5Dc. MkII, MkIII and future models revell in performance, but the original 5D will be an icon. In the same vain, I will keep my 1V and I'm in the market for a mint T90, A1 and new F1.

I will trade my 5D2 and 7D for a 5D3 later this year ;-)a


_______________
Canon Electro-Optical System

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Apr 07, 2012 13:58 as a reply to  @ actprivate's post |  #27

Im still pulling my hair out between the 1D 4 and a 5D 3.....


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dchen99
Senior Member
860 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Illinois, USA
     
Apr 07, 2012 17:40 as a reply to  @ pyrojim's post |  #28

Used ID 4 price has bottomed out at this moment, get one and try it out. You can always sell it at no less, a used is a used. If you get the 5D 3 now and decide you don't like it, you likely are not going to recoup your initial investment. (disclaimer: I am selling a 1D4 so take it with a grain of salt).
If you are patient and lucky enough on eBay you probably can get one at low 3K (not mine though).


www.flashonstudio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Apr 07, 2012 17:52 |  #29

I just sold my 1div yesterday for 3850. I bought my 5d3 for 3499. I bought a 7d for 1187 shipped (clp) to replace my 1div temporarily until the 1dx is released. might even keep the 7d.....who knows.


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Apr 07, 2012 17:53 |  #30

dchen99 wrote in post #14226922 (external link)
Used ID 4 price has bottomed out at this moment, get one and try it out. You can always sell it at no less, a used is a used. If you get the 5D 3 now and decide you don't like it, you likely are not going to recoup your initial investment. (disclaimer: I am selling a 1D4 so take it with a grain of salt).
If you are patient and lucky enough on eBay you probably can get one at low 3K (not mine though).

All depends on what the 1Dx is gonna look like at 12800 on a raw file. Its supposed to be 2 stops better than a 1DMKIV. I just saw some raw files that tells me its not. If thats the case, and were goona know in about 3 months, these guys that are dumping their MKIVs are gonna kick themselves in the A$$ when they find out that a 1Dx might now be as advertised. If you look at the 5D3 files v/s the MKIV files you going to see that they are virtually identicle with a slight edge going to the MKIV. Dont know what you or anyone else is seeing, but i think your foolish if your an MKIV owner to sell out at this point. Its just too good of a camera.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,893 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Should I jump on this 1Dmk4 or wait?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1159 guests, 161 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.