To my eyes that's a cloud.
luigis Goldmember 1,399 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina More info | Apr 05, 2012 13:28 | #16 To my eyes that's a cloud. www.luisargerich.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 05, 2012 15:19 | #17 stsva wrote in post #14215246 Also, it looks like there are several dark dots toward the right side of your image - unless those were birds you might want to check your sensor for dust. Those were birds.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
similae Senior Member 254 posts Joined May 2011 Location: Finland More info | Apr 05, 2012 15:41 | #18 Aquaticbob wrote in post #14215839 Those were birds. The thing I'm most annoyed about is the grain, or noise, or whatever it is. When I put a picture through HDR processing that really comes out, and absolutely ruins an image in my opinion. Here is an example of a picture I made HDR (Nik HDREfex PS plugin) and you can really see the noise/grain/whatever trashing my image: http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/6146/testimg1903hdr.jpg Should I be shooting in Jpeg instead of RAW for my HDR? Is this just a problem with the programs not handling the RAW file right? So the question really was about the HDR rendering bringin up the noise.. I'd recommend processing the files differently. I haven't done much HDR, but I guess running some sort of smart blur to sky should blend the color to be more even. JPG compression can be seen in the blue areas, but now it's much better than original. edit: One thing for images like this could also be to use CPL filter. That way you would get better looking sky from the start and less need to process in HDR. Unless you wan't the image look heavily HDR'd. Mikko
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EmergencyExit Member 223 posts Joined Dec 2011 Location: Sentani, Indonesia More info | Apr 05, 2012 17:29 | #19 Here's a 100% crop sample of a photo of the sky I took 2 months ago. It was taken at ISO 250 with an 18-135 even with a UV filter. Shot at Large JPEG fine quality. Image hosted by forum (589220) © Emergency Exit [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Emergency Exit Pictures
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stsva Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 05, 2012 18:05 | #20 Here's another 100% crop - 7D at ISO 200, nothing unusual about the exposure, processed through LR4, default sharpening, no luminance noise reduction, default color noise reduction; the second one is the same except with LR4 luminance NR applied (25 setting). For whatever reason, these sensors can be noisy with featureless blue areas of a scene. Image hosted by forum (589222) © stsva [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (589223) © stsva [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stsva Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 05, 2012 18:27 | #21 Here's one with more than just the sky, processed same as the first one above. If you're not looking at 100% crops but instead at full images at normal sizes, this noise drops out of sight pretty fast. Image hosted by forum (589226) © stsva [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Image hosted by forum (589228) © stsva [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1303 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||