Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 Apr 2012 (Monday) 02:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Dropped camera bag - with a full load

 
Andy_Cam
Senior Member
Avatar
385 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
     
Apr 09, 2012 02:30 |  #1

This is one of those "Why the hell did I do that?" moments. We took our kids to the zoo yesterday so the camera came along too. I took son#1 to the toilet and hung my camera bag on the door handle so that I wasn't on the floor. He was just about done and I heard another child on the other side of the door, followed by a *thunk as my bag slid off the door handle that he tried.

Not wanting to be melodramatic, but there is a feeling of dread that you have after hearing something hit the floor.

It was all in my Thinktank Retrospective 30. Apparently the padding on the bottom is not quite thick enough to cushion a 60cm drop.

The damage?

One smashed B&W Kaesemann CPL, one B&W UV filter popped apart (screwed back together again now), two mashed lens caps and a scratched 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII.

The damage is all caused from the lens caps grips being pushed into the elements of the filters. Whether the lenses would have been damaged without filters is anybodies guess, but I've convinced myself that smashed filters is the lesser of two evils.

Everybody loves carnage so... :

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Unfortunately, when I removed it to check the 70-200 for damage, a bit of glass stuck between the filter and the lens front element has scratched the lens. :cry:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


I'm insured, so will see what the company says tomorrow when I give them a call. Filter replacement should be straightforward, but removing the scratch from the front of the 70-200 is not so... It doesn't affect photos, but it will affect the resale value and will bug the hell out of me every time I see it.

[/therapy post]

Gear | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Apr 09, 2012 02:42 |  #2

That Suxxors!!!! :(
Good luck with the Ins. Co., hope all is restored to previous condition. :)


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Willabee
Junior Member
29 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Apr 09, 2012 03:10 |  #3

ahh, terribly sorry to hear. like tanker, hope the insurance comes through for you on such sweet glass




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paulkaye
Senior Member
Avatar
559 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Leamington, UK
     
Apr 09, 2012 04:33 |  #4

Unfortunately, when I removed it to check the 70-200 for damage, a bit of glass stuck between the filter and the lens front element has scratched the lens.

I'm told this is the problem with filters as a 'protection' - it probably makes things worse.

Sorry to hear of the drop though - I guess there are two types of photographers: those who've dropped their gear and those who have yet to drop their gear.


Paul
_______________
5DII, 50mm 1.4, 17-40L, 85mm 1.8, 24-105L IS, 70-200L f4 IS, 100-400L, 100 f2.8 Macro
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Foggiest
Senior Member
584 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2012
     
Apr 09, 2012 05:16 |  #5

paulkaye wrote in post #14234022 (external link)
I'm told this is the problem with filters as a 'protection' - it probably makes things worse.

Sorry to hear of the drop though - I guess there are two types of photographers: those who've dropped their gear and those who have yet to drop their gear.

This post has finally convinced me to remove the UV filter from my 70-200 .
Sorry to hear about the damage mate , I would be gutted :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mjww
Senior Member
675 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Cayman Islands
     
Apr 09, 2012 06:16 |  #6

Accidents happen. Glad to hear that the damage was not worse.


Equipment list - According to the wife - "how many more lenses do you need? Yet another camera?"  ???

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Amamba
Goldmember
Avatar
3,685 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 65
Joined Nov 2007
Location: SE MI
     
Apr 09, 2012 07:34 |  #7

This is why I never put thin glass in front of expensive glass.

The weight of your bag matters as much as the height of the drop. Do you need more than one lens st a zoo ?


Ex-Canon shooter. Now Sony Nex.
Life Lessons: KISS. RTFM. Don't sweat the small stuff.
My Gear List (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
walcotboy15
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Jan 2012
     
Apr 09, 2012 07:36 |  #8

yep, really sorry to see that.
thinktank owners...
10-20-30 they are great bags, but that bottom really really needs an extra cushion. foam... anything to protect the lens, hope you get it fixed quickly, and a great post for thinktank owners BEWARE




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rwhardy
Senior Member
404 posts
Joined Jan 2012
     
Apr 09, 2012 07:39 |  #9

i don't think there is any "repair" for the coating scratch on the front element other than a new front element. i could be wrong, though. if the insurance doesn't cover it you'll learn to live with it. as far as re-sale goes, do you see yourself selling that lens any time soon? i'm betting not.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hitthespot
Senior Member
554 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
     
Apr 09, 2012 08:02 as a reply to  @ rwhardy's post |  #10

Sorry to hear about your lens.

I once left the house with my Minolta 201 and 50mm 1.4 lens attached. Placed the camera on top of the car to unlock it, my mom came out of the house and started talking to me, and you guessed it, I forgot the camera. Needless to say it cost me almost as much as a new one to fix it. I was young had very little money and no insurance. I was devestated. I learned early on that my camera equipment needed to be protected from my clumbsy and forgetful self.

I always place at least 1 inch of extra padding on the bottom of my bag for my lenses, and 1/2 inch all the way around. I usually just use the extra separaters they give you with the bag. I also suspend my camera with lens attached at least 2 inches above the bottom of the bag. I leave things like camera caps and flashes on the bottom of the bag. I never grab the camera without first wrapping the strap around my neck or once around my hand. Am I anal? Yes, but I know me.

I'm like you, I enjoy my equipment as much as the pictures I take, and everytime I thought about the mark on my lens it would bother me bad. Good luck with your insurance.


Canon 7D, 24-105 f/4L IS, 70-200 f/4L IS, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS, 430EX II,

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Apr 09, 2012 08:26 |  #11

Andy_Cam wrote in post #14233791 (external link)
Unfortunately, when I removed it to check the 70-200 for damage, a bit of glass stuck between the filter and the lens front element has scratched the lens. :cry:

Ouch, sorry to hear that. I hate having to take all my gear into such toilets, there is so little space (especially with the portaloo types) and I also don't want to put my bag on the (often damp) floor as I am never too sure what the "damp" is :shock:. My bag has taken a tumble a few times too, fortunately I have been lucky so far.

I think that is the biggest argument against filters, they break way more easily than a lens, and in situations where the lens would have been fine on it's own, the filter breaks and actually causes the damage.

My gear gets bashed about a bit, so I go filterless at all times (except when I need a CPL or ND for the shot). I would have broken loads of filters over the years, if I had them fitted for "protection".

Hopefully the insurance will cough up for a repair and you will soon have your baby back to pristine condition.

I also hope that you got some great shots at the zoo. :grin:

Amamba wrote in post #14234430 (external link)
Do you need more than one lens st a zoo ?

Well, I do. I always have a bagful with me and generally use most of them in a day at a zoo. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
uOpt
Goldmember
Avatar
2,283 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Boston, MA, USA
     
Apr 09, 2012 08:57 |  #12

You know, I was thinking about this for other reasons just last week.

I am pretty sure that lens caps have done more damage than good to my lenses so far. And my CPL has a scratch that I am sure is from the cap, too.

I am seriously considering not using them anymore in the bag. I just put soft cloth on the bottom of the bag.


My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Apr 09, 2012 09:39 |  #13

Look at this way, it could have been worse.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrew_WOT
Goldmember
1,421 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: CA
     
Apr 09, 2012 11:43 |  #14

Andy_Cam wrote in post #14233791 (external link)
It was all in my Thinktank Retrospective 30. Apparently the padding on the bottom is not quite thick enough to cushion a 60cm drop.

ThinkTank Retro is quite underpadded. Contact TT customer support, they will send you thicker bottom pad, I got one and it's so much better than stock, plus keeps bag from sagging in the middle.
So sorry about the damage. :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Apr 09, 2012 11:52 |  #15

paulkaye wrote in post #14234022 (external link)
I guess there are two types of photographers: those who've dropped their gear and those who have yet to drop their gear.

i somehow joined the dropped group yesterday as well...although i don't even know when how it dropped...but i've got a broken 35f2 i have to send in...as well as the OS going crazy on my sigma 150-500OS...it's been a bad 24hrs...off to the post office for me...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,760 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Dropped camera bag - with a full load
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1268 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.