Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 15 Apr 2012 (Sunday) 19:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

15 minute exposure

 
tats
Senior Member
Avatar
899 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 35
Joined Aug 2011
Location: NJ
     
Apr 16, 2012 16:31 |  #16

I like it, but agree that a shorter exposure might have yielded "better" ghosts. I'm very suprised security let you take that...


Rob
Canon 5DMkII -- 35L -- 50 1.8
Feedback/Gear --- Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Russo09
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
737 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Apr 16, 2012 18:11 |  #17

For everyone wondering how I did it, 10 stop ND filter :-)

For everyone else's comments, I really appreciate them. I'm probably headed back into NYC this weekend so I'll probably find myself back here trying different exposure times, some shorter, and maybe one or two even longer. I'll figure out shot by shot where that balance is.


-Nick
Canon 5D Mark 3 | Sigma 85mm 1.4 | Canon 17-40mm f2L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Apr 16, 2012 18:27 |  #18

I would have gone for a longer exposure to eliminate the ghosts completely. Except for one standing very still for a very long time.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hellory
Member
148 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Chester County, PA
     
Apr 16, 2012 18:34 |  #19

Russo09 wrote in post #14277009 (external link)
For everyone wondering how I did it, 10 stop ND filter :-) .

there we go. :) that's what I was looking for.

and that video is great drvnbysound...and she shoots with a Canon too. :cool:


My pics on SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Apr 16, 2012 18:35 |  #20

You could just stack the images and then use a stacking program to completely remove all the people, that would have looked cool too and would take but a fraction of the time with shorter exposures as well. Much easier to dial in the settings that way and no ND filters etc...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Max ­ Powers
Goldmember
1,114 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Apr 17, 2012 10:01 |  #21

I like ghosting but I think 15min is overkill.

30 seconds to 2 min woulda been totally fine.


Nikon D600
-Samyang 14mm f2.8 -Nikon 50mm 1.8G -Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR
-Nikon 24-120 f3.5-5.6 D
flickr (external link)||500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Max ­ Powers
Goldmember
1,114 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Apr 17, 2012 13:23 |  #22

Probably keep the filter I would think. It's dim but not that dim.


Nikon D600
-Samyang 14mm f2.8 -Nikon 50mm 1.8G -Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR
-Nikon 24-120 f3.5-5.6 D
flickr (external link)||500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Max ­ Powers
Goldmember
1,114 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Apr 17, 2012 15:16 |  #23

Fair enough. Either use a different filter, bump up the iso or whatever.


Nikon D600
-Samyang 14mm f2.8 -Nikon 50mm 1.8G -Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR
-Nikon 24-120 f3.5-5.6 D
flickr (external link)||500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Russo09
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
737 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Apr 17, 2012 21:35 |  #24

kjonnnn wrote in post #14281564 (external link)
True. It probably could be done in a shorter time, minus the filter. Doesnt take long to blur people moving.

Umm 30 seconds wouldn't do much there...People don't move as much as you think.

I'd probably be able to do the 30 seconds without the filter at f22 or so, I'll find out the next time I head there :)


-Nick
Canon 5D Mark 3 | Sigma 85mm 1.4 | Canon 17-40mm f2L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scatterbrained
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,511 posts
Gallery: 267 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 4607
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
     
Apr 17, 2012 21:44 |  #25

I say stop it down to f/16 and go for 20 minutes! Bring lunch with you. :)
I'm not sure whether or not I like the dots of light from peoples cell phones. It's interesting, but not enough to be intriguing, yet just enough to be distracting. ;)


VanillaImaging.com (external link)"Vacuous images for the Vapid consumer"
500px (external link)
flickr (external link)
1x (external link)
instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
Apr 17, 2012 22:05 as a reply to  @ Scatterbrained's post |  #26

Love the shots. I've been playing with this "Black Glass" method lately, too. It's interesting to see how long someone has to remain motionless (or mostly so) to become one of the "ghosts" in the image. I need to find a busy walkway on our campus and try this.

FWIW, I like the color one better.:cool:


Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
Apr 17, 2012 22:10 |  #27

tats wrote in post #14276494 (external link)
I like it, but agree that a shorter exposure might have yielded "better" ghosts. I'm very suprised security let you take that...

They don't care. I once stood there taking a dozen or more shots with my camera on a monopod. I was one of at least a half dozen photographers standing around.


Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
M_Six
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,845 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Dec 2010
Location: East Central IL
     
Apr 17, 2012 22:19 as a reply to  @ M_Six's post |  #28

I hope you don't mind, Nick, but you centered your image so perfectly that I thought I'd have a bit of fun with it.

IMAGE: http://bimmermail.com/gc2.jpg

Mark J.
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Apr 17, 2012 22:46 |  #29

Titus213 wrote in post #14274664 (external link)
Ghosts of people passed....

Thats the feeling I get as well, very interesting photo.


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpam.pix
Goldmember
1,275 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Apr 2011
     
Apr 17, 2012 23:43 as a reply to  @ M_Six's post |  #30

@M_six...very subtle. Took me a while to figure it out.


1D-III with stuff to stick on it:
70-200L, 28-70L, 24-105L, 300L, 50, 10-17 fish, 2.0x TC
Image editing OK, encouraged, and expected. Thank you for helping me learn!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,459 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it.
15 minute exposure
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1245 guests, 150 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.