So what would be a good lens to round out my equipment, see my sig, I'm pretty much covered from 24mm up to 400mm so I'm thinking something wide and nice and sharp.
Recommendations ??
Thanks !
alexxn Senior Member 396 posts Likes: 9 Joined Nov 2011 Location: S Florida More info | Apr 16, 2012 09:46 | #1 So what would be a good lens to round out my equipment, see my sig, I'm pretty much covered from 24mm up to 400mm so I'm thinking something wide and nice and sharp. Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,729 posts Likes: 4064 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Apr 16, 2012 09:49 | #2 The Canon 10-22. Outstanding IQ and fits nicely into your lineup. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheWarlock Senior Member 505 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2011 Location: Stavanger, Norway More info | A 10-22 would fit in nicely, since you seem to prefer FF lenses, maybe a 17-40L or even a 16-35L. Or what about going with a prime? Canon 60D, Canon 1100D , 17-40 4L , 24mm 1.4L II,Zeiss Distagon T*2/35 ZE,50mm 1.2L, 85mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 IS L, 50mm 1.8II, 18-55 III, 430 exII,TT Retrospective 20, Lightroom 4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2012 10:05 | #4 The Warlock wrote in post #14274347 A 10-22 would fit in nicely, since you seem to prefer FF lenses, maybe a 17-40L or even a 16-35L. Or what about going with a prime? I'm open to a prime, what do you suggest ? Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheWarlock Senior Member 505 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2011 Location: Stavanger, Norway More info | Apr 16, 2012 10:10 | #5 alexxn wrote in post #14274371 I'm open to a prime, what do you suggest ? Would it have to be wider than 24mm? Canon 60D, Canon 1100D , 17-40 4L , 24mm 1.4L II,Zeiss Distagon T*2/35 ZE,50mm 1.2L, 85mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 IS L, 50mm 1.8II, 18-55 III, 430 exII,TT Retrospective 20, Lightroom 4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2012 10:12 | #6 The Warlock wrote in post #14274397 Would it have to be wider than 24mm? Yes definitely, I'm liking the sound of the 10-22 though... Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheWarlock Senior Member 505 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2011 Location: Stavanger, Norway More info | If I would buy a prime wider than 24mm, it would be the zeiss 18mm or Canon 14mm, but they pricey, especially the Canon. The 10-22 would probably be the best choice, it would be really wide. Canon 60D, Canon 1100D , 17-40 4L , 24mm 1.4L II,Zeiss Distagon T*2/35 ZE,50mm 1.2L, 85mm 1.8, 100mm 2.8 IS L, 50mm 1.8II, 18-55 III, 430 exII,TT Retrospective 20, Lightroom 4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Billginthekeys Billy the kid 7,359 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Islamorada, FL More info | Apr 16, 2012 10:33 | #8 In your situation I would get the 10-22, it is always in demand, and if you decide to go FF in the future you can sell it and get the 17-40 for the same money and have almost an identical focal length but with a fixed aperture and better build quality. The 10-22 has great IQ though, and would certainly pair best with what you have now. Mr. the Kid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2012 10:44 | #9 As prime goes you really don't have many options, espacially if you want to go only with canon. 5D2, 24-70L F2.8, Sigma 85 F1.4, Sigma 50 F1.4, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400 F4.5-5.6 II, 430EX II X 2, A few Pocketwizards
LOG IN TO REPLY |
highergr0und Senior Member 545 posts Joined Aug 2011 More info | Apr 16, 2012 10:57 | #10 10-22 would make the most sense...... T3i, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 30 1.4, 18-55 kit, 55-250, YN-565, a few books, some software, and a desire to get good.....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2012 11:07 | #11 What about the Sigma 10-20 ? Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Apr 16, 2012 11:16 | #12 In addition to whatever wide lens you get, try a fast prime like an 85 1.8 or a 50 1.4. I love my zooms for their versatility. But there are things only a fast prime can do for you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2012 11:23 | #13 gonzogolf wrote in post #14274712 In addition to whatever wide lens you get, try a fast prime like an 85 1.8 or a 50 1.4. I love my zooms for their versatility. But there are things only a fast prime can do for you. Agreed. A Sigma 30 1.4 is on the radar after the wide lens Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
noisejammer Goldmember 1,053 posts Likes: 6 Joined May 2010 Location: Toronto ON More info | Apr 16, 2012 11:49 | #14 Since you don't have any EF-S lenses at the moment, it looks like there's an easy path into full frame. Perhaps the best way you could get a wide angle is by purchasing a 5D Mk II. Several cameras and more glass than I will admit to.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2012 12:43 | #15 noisejammer wrote in post #14274918 Since you don't have any EF-S lenses at the moment, it looks like there's an easy path into full frame. Perhaps the best way you could get a wide angle is by purchasing a 5D Mk II. In any cases, here are some lens suggestions. My take would be to avoid EF-S lenses because you're going to have to dump them eventually. TS-E 17 - very versatile as a tilt-shift and can be shot hand held. Zeiss ZE 21/2.8 - world class Other options - 8-15 fisheye or a 15 or 16 mm fisheye... just for a different look. (It's easy to stitch images together if you really want a panoramic image.) You know, I'd LOVE to go fullframe (yes there has been a method to my madness concerning my lens choices) but I'm shooting extreme sports more and more so unless I go with a 5dMK3, fullframe really isn't an option (I don't have the $$ for that) Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1265 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||