i semi-hijacked another thread with this question but didnt get any answer so id like to ask it here...
i looked at the sticky (at the beginning of this sub-forum?) and i didnt really see very much difference in the 7D and my 550D other than this:
8fps vs. 3.7fps
two more levels of still resolution (intermediary not at either extreme)
300,000 fewer sensor photo receptors
dual digic 4 processor (which i THINK gives it the high fps rate)
19 AF points vs. 9 AF points (but i only use the center point)
120,440 fewer screen dots (lcd screen?)
pentaprism vs pentamirror viewfinder (meaning WHAT exactly?)
better viewfinder percentage (is it really that important?)
better viewfinder magnefication (is THIS really that important?)
1/8000 shutter speed vs 1/4000 shutter speed (i never used 1/2000 on my F1N so is THIS that important?)
exposure bracketing is a full stop more
NO eye-fi for the 7D like on the 550D because of the CF vs. SD card
better sealing (might be nice)
and it has GPS (not important to me)...
does it sound like its worth the extra $500-$800 to move up?
i DO like the bigger body dimensions because the 550D feels a bit diminutive (think Pentax ME body) to me...
i dont see much of an 'upgrade' from the 550 to the 7, am i missing something?
here is the link to the page i was referring to...
http://www.dpreview.com/products/com...tDir=ascending![]()
here is my current GEAR LIST since people like to see them...
550d (T2i), 50 f1.4 USM, 18-135 f3.5-5.6 IS USM, 70-200L f2.8 IS USM, access to: 10-22 f3.5-5.6 IS USM, 55-250 f3.5-5.6 ISM...
im not opposed to going with EF lenses (thinking of a 28-70L f2.8 if i were to go with an FF body) but like primes even though i only own the one!

