Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 18 Apr 2012 (Wednesday) 07:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

kirsty

 
poldodog
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Hertford united kingdom
     
Apr 18, 2012 07:43 |  #1

daughter in law on wedding day

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/04/3/LQ_591454.jpg
Image hosted by forum (591454) © poldodog [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Apr 18, 2012 09:33 |  #2

lovely photo




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HughR
Senior Member
Avatar
999 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Apr 18, 2012 09:59 |  #3

Really beautiful bride & photo.


Hugh
Canon 60D, Original Digital Rebel (2003)
EFS 15-85mm IS USM, EF 70-300mm IS USM, Tokina 11-16mm
Speedlite 430EX, Speedlite 430EX II,
Qbox 16 pro, Lastolite EZbox 24x24, Lumiquest Softbox III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poldodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Hertford united kingdom
     
Apr 18, 2012 11:14 |  #4

HughR wrote in post #14286366 (external link)
Really beautiful bride & photo.

many thanks think my son did well i was just second shooting as i did not want to risk it all going wrong on the day lol

rick_reno wrote in post #14286225 (external link)
lovely photo

many thanks


Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poldodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Hertford united kingdom
     
Apr 18, 2012 11:34 |  #5

couple more c& c appreciated ps they had ,nt fallen out i set it up lol lets hope it s a while before it happens for real lol

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/04/3/LQ_591493.jpg
Image hosted by forum (591493) © poldodog [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/04/3/LQ_591494.jpg
Image hosted by forum (591494) © poldodog [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Apr 18, 2012 11:46 |  #6

Are you looking for C&C?


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poldodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Hertford united kingdom
     
Apr 18, 2012 11:50 |  #7

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #14286951 (external link)
Are you looking for C&C?

i am sir but im noticing some compression on the last two just trying to sort that out without much luck


Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Apr 18, 2012 17:53 |  #8

poldodog wrote in post #14286967 (external link)
i am sir but im noticing some compression on the last two just trying to sort that out

Alright, then here is my take. Mind you, I am posting this as my opinion (by no means fact) and with the intention to help, not put down. If you feel offended at all, I am sorry and that was not my intention. If you disagree with everything I say, I will not take offense to that.

1. Im not a real fan of it. I dont like the straight on pose, the depth of field is too big for my liking, and she doenst look like a happy bride. I would have tilted her shoulders more to the right of the frame. I do like that you got the entire dress in the shot, but im not a huge fan of the wide angle look either.

2. Again, the depth of field is too deep for my liking and the expressions are odd again. She looks asleep/sleeping beauty, and he looks confused. I am guessing this is a shot taken by the main photographer from straight on which would be a better angle.

3. Again, she doenst look happy and the shot is confusing. It is obvious that she is looking at the main photographer and straight on would have been a better angle again.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poldodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Hertford united kingdom
     
Apr 19, 2012 03:53 |  #9

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #14288847 (external link)
Alright, then here is my take. Mind you, I am posting this as my opinion (by no means fact) and with the intention to help, not put down. If you feel offended at all, I am sorry and that was not my intention. If you disagree with everything I say, I will not take offense to that.

1. Im not a real fan of it. I dont like the straight on pose, the depth of field is too big for my liking, and she doenst look like a happy bride. I would have tilted her shoulders more to the right of the frame. I do like that you got the entire dress in the shot, but im not a huge fan of the wide angle look either.

2. Again, the depth of field is too deep for my liking and the expressions are odd again. She looks asleep/sleeping beauty, and he looks confused. I am guessing this is a shot taken by the main photographer from straight on which would be a better angle.

3. Again, she doenst look happy and the shot is confusing. It is obvious that she is looking at the main photographer and straight on would have been a better angle again.

thank you for the constructive comments i see where you are coming from in shot three she was not supposed to be smiling it was staged to look like they had fallen out but i noticed in my shots i did not catch her smiling much this may be down to lack of timing which is why i did not take this on on their important day .


Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Apr 19, 2012 09:18 |  #10

Besides what others have said...Huge head, wide angle, no thanks. Don't take a picture with a specific focal length because that length is CONVENIENT to get the picture....always take the picture with the best focal length to present the subject in the most appealing manner appropriate to the imagined shot.

IMAGE: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com/150711_5803-JA.jpg

Brightened skin and eyes, distorted head to make it look more proportionate, some vignette, contrast and saturation...

Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poldodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Hertford united kingdom
     
Apr 19, 2012 10:46 as a reply to  @ form's post |  #11

wow glad i never claimed to be a professional still i take on all your comments and thats how we learn, also some weird things going on in your edit over sharpened maybe as there are some strange edges .


Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Apr 19, 2012 11:17 |  #12

Strange edges are from sharpening a resized image and the traits of how your lens handles background blur.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poldodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Hertford united kingdom
     
Apr 19, 2012 11:30 as a reply to  @ form's post |  #13

ah i see


Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Apr 19, 2012 16:14 |  #14

Whenever I look at images of brides, I actually look for the eyes. It's important to brighten the eyes up. This is why pros use reflectors and softboxes, even outside. You can fix it a little in post, but for the most part, it's easier just to light the subject first.

All in all, I like the shots.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
poldodog
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
520 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Hertford united kingdom
     
Apr 20, 2012 05:27 |  #15

SuzyView wrote in post #14294375 (external link)
Whenever I look at images of brides, I actually look for the eyes. It's important to brighten the eyes up. This is why pros use reflectors and softboxes, even outside. You can fix it a little in post, but for the most part, it's easier just to light the subject first.

All in all, I like the shots.

thank you suzy as this is not my normal type of subject i took these more as a father on the day so did,nt want to get in the way of the pro being payed to do a job. & as such had to settle for maybe not the best angles but i,m generally pleased with them


Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,849 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
kirsty
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1309 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.