First photo appears to me as if she's either 3' tall or kneeling on the ground. I agree that her expression isn't what one would expect on a wedding day.
Apr 23, 2012 17:54 | #16 First photo appears to me as if she's either 3' tall or kneeling on the ground. I agree that her expression isn't what one would expect on a wedding day. Cameras and lenses...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
poldodog THREAD STARTER Senior Member 520 posts Joined Apr 2006 Location: Hertford united kingdom More info | Apr 24, 2012 09:17 | #17 av8r wrote in post #14315540 First photo appears to me as if she's either 3' tall or kneeling on the ground. I agree that her expression isn't what one would expect on a wedding day. that, s because she is kneeling Canon 5d . canon 1dmk11. 24-105 L is ,100-400 L is ,50 mm 1,4 sigma 12- 24 dg .... learning on th job
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2012 15:50 | #18 It's a nice series. Yes there are something wrong but I am sure she will like them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pirate4 Senior Member 693 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Southern California More info | Apr 25, 2012 03:34 | #19 #1 is boring. The grass sucks, her expression is lifeless and the dress looks like she just plopped down. Canon 7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
supernova74 Senior Member 957 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Adelaide, Australia More info | Apr 25, 2012 06:45 | #20 Red Tie Photography wrote in post #14288847 Alright, then here is my take. Mind you, I am posting this as my opinion (by no means fact) and with the intention to help, not put down. If you feel offended at all, I am sorry and that was not my intention. If you disagree with everything I say, I will not take offense to that. 1. Im not a real fan of it. I dont like the straight on pose, the depth of field is too big for my liking, and she doenst look like a happy bride. I would have tilted her shoulders more to the right of the frame. I do like that you got the entire dress in the shot, but im not a huge fan of the wide angle look either. 2. Again, the depth of field is too deep for my liking and the expressions are odd again. She looks asleep/sleeping beauty, and he looks confused. I am guessing this is a shot taken by the main photographer from straight on which would be a better angle. 3. Again, she doenst look happy and the shot is confusing. It is obvious that she is looking at the main photographer and straight on would have been a better angle again. For once I actually agree with Bryans Comments (he nitpicks a lot). Number 3, seriously, they seem miles apart... Like they dont even know each other. Even if this was "in bewtween" shots, they should be all over each other..... They just got married for gods sakes! Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1309 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||