Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 19 Apr 2012 (Thursday) 02:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Let me know what you think

 
Roush611
Member
61 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Feb 2012
     
Apr 19, 2012 02:15 |  #1

2 pictures I took yesterday after an appointment at a clients house.

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7076/7088775441_69f2cd005d_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jdocphoto/70887​75441/  (external link)
Waterfalledit (external link) by JDoc Photography (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5312/7092743341_73964ec635_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jdocphoto/70927​43341/  (external link)
Waterfall2 (external link) by JDoc Photography (external link), on Flickr



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 466
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Apr 19, 2012 06:39 |  #2

I like the scene/location...you just need to work the scene better to get "the perfect shot".


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Apr 19, 2012 08:55 as a reply to  @ chauncey's post |  #3

To my eyes, these shots look over exposed. When I see moss covered rock like that, I picture an area that's almost always in heavy shade. By darkening these shots, it will also make the areas where the sunlight is striking more evident.

Here's a quick example of what I mean.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/04/3/LQ_591635.jpg
Image hosted by forum (591635) © navydoc [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
letsbewild
Senior Member
Avatar
333 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Florida
     
Apr 19, 2012 09:09 |  #4

I think the first shot is definitely the winner, and I like navydoc's edit of it. very pretty shot


Nick
http://www.letsbewild.​com/photography-course/ (external link)
http://www.letsbewild.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roush611
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
61 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Feb 2012
     
Apr 19, 2012 09:31 |  #5

I appreciate the feed back. Navydoc, I see what you are saying. What tool did you use to accomplish what you did? I will play with the shot a bit. I got lazy and only used ACR on the first one. Looking at the second shot again I missed focus pretty bad.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Apr 20, 2012 06:20 as a reply to  @ Roush611's post |  #6

What tool did you use to accomplish what you did?

Sorry for not responding sooner but I just noticed your question. I use Photoshop CS5 for editing and have it set up to open jpg and tiff files in ACR first. That's where I reduced exposure by about a full stop. I don't recall if I adjusted white balance but if so, I prefer to do that within ACR too. Back in Photoshop, I adjusted contrast and vibrance. Two things I also did was to use a gradient map to equalize the overall brightness and to use a saturation adjustment layer in luminosity blend mode to push the yellow of the moss to a more green shade.

I tend to do a lot of "a little of this" and "a little of that" rather than having a set method.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,983 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2010
     
Apr 21, 2012 00:13 |  #7

navydoc wrote in post #14297426 (external link)
Sorry for not responding sooner but I just noticed your question. I use Photoshop CS5 for editing and have it set up to open jpg and tiff files in ACR first. That's where I reduced exposure by about a full stop. I don't recall if I adjusted white balance but if so, I prefer to do that within ACR too. Back in Photoshop, I adjusted contrast and vibrance. Two things I also did was to use a gradient map to equalize the overall brightness and to use a saturation adjustment layer in luminosity blend mode to push the yellow of the moss to a more green shade.

I tend to do a lot of "a little of this" and "a little of that" rather than having a set method.

What is the advantage of ACR adjustments vs Photoshop CS5?


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Apr 21, 2012 11:03 as a reply to  @ Qbx's post |  #8

With white balance adjustments in particular, I just find using the 'temperature/tint' sliders along with the eyedropper tool in ACR to be more intuitive and easier than using a levels or curves adjustment in Photoshop. Adjusting exposure values as well as white balance is helpful to me especially when dealing with skin tones. I will also use the vibrance adjustment in ACR to reduce any over saturation caused by the other adjustments. If you open the file back in CS5 as a smart object, you can always double click to reopen back in the ACR editor to fine tune if need be.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roush611
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
61 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Feb 2012
     
Apr 21, 2012 12:29 |  #9

Thanks for the tips I really appreciate it. I am a Photoshop noob, that damn program makes my head spin ha ha.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
etlm757
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
Apr 24, 2012 15:21 |  #10

i really love the 1st one as well... and i have to say i love what navy doc has done with it.



T.L.
Enjoy The Little Moments
T.L.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GorgeShooter
Goldmember
Avatar
1,422 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
     
Apr 26, 2012 11:42 |  #11

I think the original of the first shot is better than the edit (too dark). The edit is going in the right directions, but I think it was taken a bit too far. It may not be true, but it seems a bit tilted to the left.


1DX | 5D MkII (gripped)
16-35 f/2.8L | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 70-200 f/4L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS | 24 f/3.5L TS-E | 45 f/2.8 TS-E | 40 f/2.8 Pancake | 15 f/2.8 Fisheye | Tokina 100 f/2.8 Macro | Canon 1.4x TC | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Manfrotto 055CXPRO4 | Kirk BH-1
:: Smugmug :: (external link) | :: Photography BLOG :: (external link) | :: Workshops and Classes (external link) ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,812 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Let me know what you think
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1398 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.