Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Apr 2012 (Thursday) 18:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Refurb 7D: Noise issue

 
drewborn
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Apr 19, 2012 18:47 |  #1

I just purchased the 7d from Canon's refurb program as an upgrade from my XSI. I really love the functionality of the camera, but it seems to be excessively noisy. Is there a fix for this through Canon? I really love to shoot with the camera, but the XSI IQ seems much better than the 7D. Thanks for the advice in advance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imsellingmyfoot
Goldmember
1,028 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 208
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Apr 19, 2012 18:49 |  #2

Post some pictures. We need examples.


BLOG (external link)| flickr (external link) | Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drewborn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Apr 19, 2012 18:53 as a reply to  @ imsellingmyfoot's post |  #3

Sample pic of the noise. image was taken overcast sky with 640 ISO. No pp done except resize to upload

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/04/3/LQ_591707.jpg
Image hosted by forum (591707) © drewborn [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imsellingmyfoot
Goldmember
1,028 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 208
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Apr 19, 2012 19:02 |  #4

The noise is to be expected because its underexposed. I pushed the exposure up about half a stop and got the exposure where I thought it should be. Most people find the 7D typically underexposes slightly, so they leave their camera at +1/3 exposure compensation all the time.


BLOG (external link)| flickr (external link) | Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Apr 19, 2012 19:02 as a reply to  @ imsellingmyfoot's post |  #5

The 7D can be somewhat unforgiving of underexposing. If you need to boost exposure more than a smidgen in post processing, noise is likely to become more evident than what you have experienced with your XSi. Too much sharpening is another source of noise. Only "cpture sharpening" should be done during raw conversion. Keep sharpening to a bare minimum and don't try to "fix" missed focus with sharpening. Later, output sharpening can be done in Photoshop to complement the intended output. If you shoot raw images and use Camera Raw or Lightroom for raw conversion, tonal adjustments can be used to help minimize noise in addition to the noise reduction that is built into ACR 6.X.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Buylongterm
Goldmember
Avatar
2,084 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 69
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Chi-town
     
Apr 19, 2012 19:06 |  #6

Mine was the same exact way. I sent it in to Canon before the warranty expired, and I felt like it was worse when I got it back.

What were your settings?

There are tons of threads about noise issues with the 7D but I always ignored them when I owned the camera. But looking back (and now owning the 5DIII) I wasn't that impressed with the quality of my pics when it came to noise.(even at low ISO).

It's funny, but my really good friend actually admitted to me the other day that he definitely saw issues but didn't want to say anything until I sold it.
Don't get me wrong, it's a fantastic camera and perhaps some of the blame should fall on me. Coming from a T1i, there definitely is a big learning curve.


Christian
flickr (external link)
@WerthLiving (Follow me on Instagram)
Canon EOS 5D MK III Gripped | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS MK II |100mm f/2.8L Macro | 24mm-105mm f/4.0L |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
4,003 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1053
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
Apr 19, 2012 19:18 |  #7

ISo 640 is ISO 800 then pulled.

And that image is at least a stop under exposed.

Did you shoot raw or jpg, how did you process the raw?


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Apr 19, 2012 19:40 as a reply to  @ RobDickinson's post |  #8

The image was shot under one of the most difficult conditions for getting a good exposure -- a bright overcast backlighting the subject. And if you increased the exposure, the subject might be better exposed, but then the sky would be blown out. This is a situation where you would be better not having the sky in the scene and also use some fill flash.

I examined the image in ACR and it really is not noisy -- just underexposed and slightly out of focus. I brightened up the image a bit and it looked fairly clean. I decided to apply NeatImage noise reduction, but there was so little noise that it did not make an observable difference. It is possible that more noise would be visible on a 100% crop of the image.


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfcRebel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,252 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
     
Apr 19, 2012 19:58 |  #9

drewborn wrote in post #14295143 (external link)
I just purchased the 7d from Canon's refurb program as an upgrade from my XSI. I really love the functionality of the camera, but it seems to be excessively noisy. Is there a fix for this through Canon? I really love to shoot with the camera, but the XSI IQ seems much better than the 7D. Thanks for the advice in advance.

After upgraded from 20D, i quickly found my 7D is VERY unforgiving in the noise department. It happens even at low ISO, perfectly exposed images that i took. If underexposed, i can just forget about the image. It requires me to change my PP workflow by adding extra noise reduction step. I refuse to do that. So, i sold my 7D and upgraded to 1D MkIII.


Fee

Canon | SIGMA | TAMRON | Kenko | Amvona

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
Apr 19, 2012 19:59 |  #10

Is it me or is it ouf of focus? The 7D is notorious and it's especially bad when it's not properly exposed. There's almost no room for error.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Apr 19, 2012 20:13 |  #11

Teamspeed has some excellent articles on milking the most from the 7D - he really knows this camera.

Start here

https://photography-on-the.net …t=768556&highli​ght=7d+faq




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Boehme
Enjoy being spanked
Avatar
7,359 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 89
Joined Jan 2007
Location: DFW Metro-mess, Texas
     
Apr 19, 2012 21:15 |  #12

elrey2375 wrote in post #14295527 (external link)
Is it me or is it ouf of focus? The 7D is notorious and it's especially bad when it's not properly exposed. There's almost no room for error.

It is definitely OOF. It did take me a while, but the 7D did make me a more aware photographer from the shooting technique perspective.

Either my camera is getting better with age or else I have figured out how to post process an image that is not too badly underexposed without boosting noise noticeably. Some of the things I do are very similar to those described by TeamSpeed in his popular thread on 7D noise reduction/avoidance. Avoidance is the key because noise reduction is just barely better than leaving the noise alone. One of the most effective methods of reducing mild noise is downsizing by even fractions (1/2, 1/4 -- just avoid exact thirds).


Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
Gear List .... Gallery: Woodturner Bill (external link)
Donate to Support POTN Operating Costs

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brokensocial
Senior Member
481 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Apr 19, 2012 23:33 |  #13

From what we've read, the 7D is a bit of a noisy camera in general. That said, underexposure will always make things noisier, so yes, check that first.


[mike and frida] photography - we shoot stuff.
chicago wedding photography (external link) | chicago wedding photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drewborn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Apr 21, 2012 15:38 as a reply to  @ brokensocial's post |  #14

Thanks for all of the advice. I am trying to shoot as much as possible so I can determine if this camera is a keeper. Having fun with it so far.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 21, 2012 16:03 |  #15

This noise issue is kind of common. I upgraded to the 7D from 30D to get better noise performance... it didn't work as well as I would have liked, so went 5d2 and been happy. Sorry to say, you just have to nail exposure everytime and/or use something like topaz denoise to your workflow.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,932 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Refurb 7D: Noise issue
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1794 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.