Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 22 Apr 2012 (Sunday) 11:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Birds in Flight lenses?

 
Bsmooth
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New England
     
Apr 22, 2012 11:44 |  #1

I have the 100-400, and its fantastic for airshows, but I must say even with the 1DMk2 that just got, it really sucks for birds in flight.
I shot 40 shots yesterday and only got about 3 keepers. I was shooting pigeons and seagulls.
True I may be the one that sucks at shooting them, but I thought with the great quick autofocus that the 1DMk2 has things would be improved over my 20D, not with this lens.
Anything or any ideas would be most welcome for this frustrated fuzzy bird shooter.
I know the 400 5.6 is probably better and also the 300with IS.
When using my trustey 70-200 without IS I get almost every shot perfect, even with BIF, but sometimes it just doesn't have the reach.
I am shooting all of this without tripod BTW.


Bruce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Immaculens
creeped by the TF....
Avatar
13,579 posts
Gallery: 88 photos
Likes: 3789
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Southern Canada
     
Apr 22, 2012 11:49 |  #2

I don't know the 1D II focus system but do you have it set to center focus and AI Servo?



7Dmk II gripped | 5Dc | 100-400L IS II | 55-250 IS STM | 100L f/2.8 IS Macro | 15-85 IS | 50 f/1.8 STM |
Learn to love to do well, and you shall.
~ C. Poseidon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Apr 22, 2012 12:12 |  #3

i can't imagine a 100-400L not being able to get BIF shots of seagulls....unless it's you, maybe the lens needs to be checked out...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Apr 22, 2012 13:21 |  #4

Bsmooth wrote in post #14308371 (external link)
I have the 100-400, and its fantastic for airshows, but I must say even with the 1DMk2 that just got, it really sucks for birds in flight.
I shot 40 shots yesterday and only got about 3 keepers. I was shooting pigeons and seagulls.
True I may be the one that sucks at shooting them, but I thought with the great quick autofocus that the 1DMk2 has things would be improved over my 20D, not with this lens.
Anything or any ideas would be most welcome for this frustrated fuzzy bird shooter.
I know the 400 5.6 is probably better and also the 300with IS.
When using my trustey 70-200 without IS I get almost every shot perfect, even with BIF, but sometimes it just doesn't have the reach.
I am shooting all of this without tripod BTW.


something is wrong!

When I shoot seagulls with an XSi (450D) and Canon 100-400 the keeper rate is high - 90%




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Apr 22, 2012 13:23 |  #5

Immaculens wrote in post #14308390 (external link)
I don't know the 1D II focus system but do you have it set to center focus and AI Servo?

That is correct on that body; center point only, AI Servo.

On that body, I can AF fast with a TC at f/8 with that lens.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Foggiest
Senior Member
584 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2012
     
Apr 22, 2012 14:47 |  #6

Is it possible the OP is unconsciously altering the focus when zooming/holding the lens .
Seen lots of great shots of birds with this lens , Watt100 springs to mind .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Apr 22, 2012 15:30 |  #7

Airshows <> BIF

Any camera can do cars/planes as target is much bigger and easier to predict in AI servo mode. I would say practice. Make sure:

1. IS off
2. Focus limiter in the farthest setting
3. High enough ISO even in day time to get higer ss, like 1/2000
4. Acquire target by holding * button. Track and when ready start pressings hutter wjile keeping * button pressed. This assumes C. Fn 4 = 3
5. You can try using surrounding points to center in AF assist. Forgot what C. Fn does that.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bsmooth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Feb 2005
Location: New England
     
Apr 22, 2012 18:14 as a reply to  @ bobbyz's post |  #8

Yep went through that list except IS is on focus limiter actually is better at close setting, farther had even worse problems, and it wasn't shutter speed the problem, the focus just didn't happen on the birds, focus button was on and was using center focus with AI tracking on. Also had zoom locked at 375.
Sample attached

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Bruce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Apr 22, 2012 18:26 |  #9

Bsmooth wrote in post #14309872 (external link)
Yep went through that list except IS is on focus limiter actually is better at close setting, farther had even worse problems, and it wasn't shutter speed the problem, the focus just didn't happen on the birds, focus button was on and was using center focus with AI tracking on. Also had zoom locked at 375.
Sample attached

I can't read the EXIF data but it's definitely looks out of focus .. so to isolate the problem it's either your camera or lens.
(I know, that doesn't help much!)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bob_r
Goldmember
2,497 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 761
Joined Aug 2006
Location: West Tennessee, USA
     
Apr 22, 2012 19:28 |  #10

watt100 wrote in post #14309923 (external link)
I can't read the EXIF data but it's definitely looks out of focus .. so to isolate the problem it's either your camera or lens.
(I know, that doesn't help much!)

Or the operator. If you had no keepers, I would suspect the lens, but since you had 3, I think your technique could be suspect. The image you posted has the exif data stripped so it's not any help identifying the problem.

Could you post an image with exif data intact? BTW, are you turning IS off? With the shutter speed required to capture birds in flight, it's not necessary and could be slowing down your AF.


Canon 7D, 5D, 35L, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.8, 135L, 200L, 10-22, 17-55, 70-300, 100-400L, 500D, 580EX(2).
Sigma 150 macro, 1.4X, 2X, Quantaray 2X, Kenko closeup tubes, Yongnuo YN685(3), Yongnuo YN-622C-TX. Lots of studio stuff.
** Image Editing OK **

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Apr 22, 2012 19:34 |  #11

i disagree with IS off, as it stabilizes the view finder, and makes tracking easier in my opinion....if you're hosting on flickr, can you post a link to the page, and the exif should be visible from there...


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Immaculens
creeped by the TF....
Avatar
13,579 posts
Gallery: 88 photos
Likes: 3789
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Southern Canada
     
Apr 22, 2012 19:50 |  #12

DreDaze wrote in post #14310238 (external link)
i disagree with IS off, as it stabilizes the view finder, and makes tracking easier in my opinion....if you're hosting on flickr, can you post a link to the page, and the exif should be visible from there...

Yep - I like IS at almost any focal length I have - especially over 180mm
its like a technological gift...



7Dmk II gripped | 5Dc | 100-400L IS II | 55-250 IS STM | 100L f/2.8 IS Macro | 15-85 IS | 50 f/1.8 STM |
Learn to love to do well, and you shall.
~ C. Poseidon

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,515 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
Apr 22, 2012 19:53 |  #13

That sample posted is focused off into the clouds.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfcRebel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,252 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
     
Apr 22, 2012 21:43 |  #14

On a normal day it's very hard to believe a 1DMkII + 100-400L would give low BIF keeper rate. The sample image shows the subject is rather small in the frame. That means, harder to place your center AF point on the bird constantly while handholding and panning. If situation allows, zoom in all the way to 400mm so that there's a larger subject area your camera's center AF can grab. Not sure if this setting is available in 1DMkII but in MkIII it allows user to set the AI Servo Tracking less sensitive so that the camera won't switch focus immediately when the subject escapes the focus point.
Another suggestion, for sky background like this, you can actually use ALL AF points and let the camera pick out the bird with whichever AF points it thinks are appropriate. You might see the keeper rate improves significantly. Sky bg is


Fee

Canon | SIGMA | TAMRON | Kenko | Amvona

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Apr 22, 2012 23:56 |  #15

1dmk2 has servo sensitivity but for something like this example shot, normal sensitivity is fine. I would have used more points or like all points as mentioned above. I have my home button programmed to track with all points in AI servo mode.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,836 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Birds in Flight lenses?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1618 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.