Greetings,
I need some help selecting a flash for my XSI. I will be using it on and off camera. My budget is $200.00.
Which is a better flash?
Nissin DI622 MK2 or Metz 50 AF-1
NJKEV Member 77 posts Joined Apr 2011 More info | Apr 23, 2012 08:53 | #1 Greetings,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 23, 2012 13:42 | #2 Wow, no bites. Maybe I should go manual with 2 YN560's.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
botw Goldmember 1,157 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Potomac, MD More info | Apr 23, 2012 14:05 | #3 I've read good things about both, but haven't used them. If you are using it on camera, definitely get something with ettl.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fe1ixs Senior Member 298 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2007 More info | Apr 23, 2012 14:37 | #4 I owned both and currently using metz. metz 50 and di622 are not at the same level. di622 is comparable to canon 430exII while metz is comparable to the big brother - canon 580ex. Owned : Sigma 30 f/1.4 - Canon EF 50 f/1.8 MKii - Tamron/Promaster 17-50 - Canon EF-S 55-250IS MK II - Metz 58AF-1 Flash - Case Logic DCB-309 Backpack - Canon S95
LOG IN TO REPLY |
APKent Hatchling 2 posts Joined Aug 2011 More info | I've had the Nissin for my 60D and have no real complaints; the only thing I would change would be the plastic foot. Canon 60D | Sigma 17-50 2.8 | Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS | Canon 50 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
botw Goldmember 1,157 posts Likes: 5 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Potomac, MD More info | Apr 23, 2012 15:03 | #6 felixs- do you have the 58 AF-1 or the 50. The 50 is positioned much closer to the 430 in pricing and performance specs, so I was surprised by your analysis. See e.g., http://speedlights.net/speedlights-power-index/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
biz64 Senior Member 251 posts Joined Jun 2011 More info | Apr 23, 2012 19:16 | #7 I have the Metz 50 and it is comparable to the 430 exii. I have been really happy with mine so far. Other advantages of the Metz over the Nissin in addition to the ones already mentioned are you can assign it to 2 different groups (group A or B) when shooting wireless, the 622 is always set to group A channel 1. The Nissin doesnt have manual zoom, the Metz does. Also, I dont think the Nissin has HSS and the Metz does. T3i | 18-55mm kit | 50mm 1.8II | Metz 50 Af-1 | Canon 85mm 1.8 | Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 | Canon 55-250mm II | Canon 15-85mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 23, 2012 20:08 | #8 biz64 wrote in post #14315875 I have the Metz 50 and it is comparable to the 430 exii. I have been really happy with mine so far. Other advantages of the Metz over the Nissin in addition to the ones already mentioned are you can assign it to 2 different groups (group A or B) when shooting wireless, the 622 is always set to group A channel 1. The Nissin doesnt have manual zoom, the Metz does. Also, I dont think the Nissin has HSS and the Metz does. this is a good summary. i can add that nissin has a mini-phone port and optical slave modes, which are not found on the Metz unit. PHOTO-TIPS-ONLINE.com – photo tips, photography reviews
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1115 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||