Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 26 Apr 2012 (Thursday) 08:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is this acceptable amount of sensor dust?

 
Feryll
Member
Avatar
101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2012
     
Apr 26, 2012 08:56 |  #1

Hello!

My test pictures had about 8 spots and now after sensor-cleaning/done by a company(without taking apart the camera)/ I still see 3 spots.
Is this considered clean ?
Test picture: f/22 , 1/50sec , OOF
Edit: Resized the picture.

3504
x
2336
TOO LARGE!
EMBED PREVENTED, IMAGE TOO LARGE:
http://img525.imagesha​ck.us/img525/4592/mg02​55.jpg
Click here to see our image rules.

5D | 17-40L | Σ 50 1.4
Former: 30D | 1D Mk II |18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 | 28 1.8 USM | a few manual lenses
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Apr 26, 2012 09:02 |  #2

Not if you paid to have it done.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicholas ­ R.
Senior Member
Avatar
455 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Apr 26, 2012 09:02 |  #3

Fery11,

Take that to Photoshop and run auto-levels and you'll see at least 15 dust-bunnies. If you are happy with that, then they did a good job and vice-versa. If your photography never sees you stopping down past f/6, then you may never be bothered by it, but if you shoot macro, portrait or landscapes, then you should have the sensor re-cleaned by yourself or someone other than the company you used.

Nicholas
www.copperhillimages.c​om (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Feryll
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2012
     
Apr 26, 2012 09:04 |  #4

It was only 12$ but I am disappointed.
Yeah auto level brings out all those dust particles. Ridiculous...


5D | 17-40L | Σ 50 1.4
Former: 30D | 1D Mk II |18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 | 28 1.8 USM | a few manual lenses
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicholas ­ R.
Senior Member
Avatar
455 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Apr 26, 2012 09:16 |  #5

Feryll wrote in post #14332027 (external link)
It was only 12$ but I am disappointed.
Yeah auto level brings out all those dust particles. Ridiculous...

You probably got your money's worth :cry:.

Seriously, don't feel too bad, sending a body to Canon @Jamesburg or @El Segundo is a crapshoot at best, some people have good luck while others get their cams back with as much and even more dust on the sensor. Either find another company to do the job or look into doing it yourself.

Nicholas
www.copperhillimages.c​om (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Apr 26, 2012 09:50 |  #6

$12 - yeah, thats acceptable.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Feryll
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
101 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2012
     
Apr 26, 2012 10:32 |  #7

Used air puffer now its better but there are still 2 visible spots at different places. (and more when used autolevels in PS)


5D | 17-40L | Σ 50 1.4
Former: 30D | 1D Mk II |18-55 IS | 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 | 28 1.8 USM | a few manual lenses
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,512 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 684
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Apr 26, 2012 10:36 |  #8

My rule is I clean it myself when the post-processing becomes annoying.

I don't take a lot of shots of the clear blue sky. I'm too busy taking pictures of more important stuff. So it doesn't often come up.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brokensocial
Senior Member
481 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Apr 26, 2012 10:49 |  #9

Goodness...f/22? If you can't see it in normal usage, I wouldn't sweat it.


[mike and frida] photography - we shoot stuff.
chicago wedding photography (external link) | chicago wedding photography blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Apr 26, 2012 11:01 |  #10

Stop shooting at f22 (other than to check the sensor's state of cleanliness... or lack of it).

It's rarely necessary to use smaller than f8 or f11 on a crop camera like your 30D. I doubt you'll even see the dust specks then.

Learn to clean it yourself. I used Dust Aid to clean my 30Ds, which are sort of a lighlty adhesive pad that grabs the dust. Always had to follow up with a bulb blower to get rid of some remaining loose dust. Only occasionally wet cleaned them (sometimes it's necessary if there is oil on the sensor, probably lubricant from the shutter itself).


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicholas ­ R.
Senior Member
Avatar
455 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Apr 26, 2012 11:24 |  #11

amfoto1 wrote in post #14332676 (external link)
Stop shooting at f22 (other than to check the sensor's state of cleanliness... or lack of it).

It's rarely necessary to use smaller than f8 or f11 on a crop camera like your 30D. I doubt you'll even see the dust specks then.

Learn to clean it yourself. I used Dust Aid to clean my 30Ds, which are sort of a lighlty adhesive pad that grabs the dust. Always had to follow up with a bulb blower to get rid of some remaining loose dust. Only occasionally wet cleaned them (sometimes it's necessary if there is oil on the sensor, probably lubricant from the shutter itself).

Alan,

It really depends on what you're shooting and the final output:
1) Macro shooters routinely stop down heavily, way past f/8
2) Portrait shooters typically use very light backgrounds and can see dust clearly at f/6 or f/7
3) Landscape shooters see dust at mid-range f-stops, usually in the blue skies and clouds

Now, if you are just an avid amateur who is not selling images or prints, yes, don't worry about dust. If you always shoot wide open, the same applies, don't worry about it. But if you are in the 3 categories I listed and are planning to sell your work, you should try to keep the sensor as clean as possible.

Nicholas




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
modchild
Goldmember
Avatar
1,469 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Lincoln, Uk
     
Apr 26, 2012 14:05 |  #12

I shoot a lot of macro stuff, up to f16 at times, and I hate dust spots on them. There's usually so much detail in macro that it's hard to clone out. I had one that looked like I had a hunchback wasp last time my sensor was bad.
I've just updated to a 5D3 and I'm a bit leery to start cleaning that up just in case of a balls up. I know it's perfect at the moment and the lens doesn't get swapped much so I'm hoping it's going to stay that way for at least a while. It wouldn't be such a nerve wracking experience on my 60D though as the money factor doesn't seem to come into it too much.


EOS 5D MkIII, EOS 70D, EOS 650D, EOS M, Canon 24-70 f2.8L MkII, Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII, Canon 100 f2.8L Macro, Canon 17-40 f4L IS, Canon 24-105 f4L IS, Canon 300 f4L IS, Canon 85 f1.8, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 40 f2.8 STM, Canon 35 f2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Tamron 18-270 PZD, Tamron 28-300 VC, 580EX II Flash, Nissin Di866 MkII Flash, Sigma EM 140 Macro Flash and other bits.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmosman
Senior Member
Avatar
467 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Essex, England
     
Apr 26, 2012 15:58 as a reply to  @ modchild's post |  #13

I wouldn'y worry about 3 spots, in real life pictures you will not see them.

My word I need a new LCD screen, your attached image is huge !!!;)


Cameras & Lens all due to my kind wife :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joayne
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,393 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 3879
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Stuck@Coachella
     
Apr 26, 2012 16:05 |  #14

Feryll.. you need to bring that image down to the acceptable size limit, or a Mod will "help" you ;)

Image Posting Rules

Use the search function to see what other members do regarding sensor dust.

I use Copperhill
There is a tutorial on that site that is very helpful..
.. as is Nicholas R.


joayne Contribute to POTN | Worldwide Photo Week

Please Quote the post to which you are responding.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,513 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Is this acceptable amount of sensor dust?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1008 guests, 184 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.