Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 27 Apr 2012 (Friday) 15:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

OK, please advise about focus points

 
guitarjeff
Senior Member
674 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2012
     
Apr 27, 2012 15:22 |  #1

I happened to read this article last night.

http://improvephotogra​phy.com …compose-compose-portrait/ (external link)

I am in the situation where my Rebel bodies (450D 500D0 have only 9 AF points. I have been using the center AF point in portraits ever since I have been taking them. I have had many instances where I felt the eyes weren't in good focus and I couldn't understand why. I think this article may have hit the reason.

I bugged my daughter this morning to let me get a couple shots and I used auto focus points instead of the center, and low an behold, on a couple shots the focus on the eyes seemed better than many of my shots using the center point.

But, a couple other times the camera didn't even hit on the face but chose more contrasty places like the hair line and such, and then the eyes were out worse than normal.

So my question is, is the only real way out of this problem for those of us with 9 AF points to simply continue with the center point AF, and then forget about trying to shoot wide open (2.8 aperture for me) and shoot at like a 3.5 or 4 aperture?

I feel like that the focus hasn't been perfect for me and now I am thinking that it's not my camera/lens calibration but that i am simply trying to shoot at 2.8, then trying to focus then recompose and I am moving out of that small DOF when recomposing, thereby getting the eyes slightly oof.

What aperture do most of you shoot your portraits at and what af points do you use?

In other words, all boiled down, how consistent of focus on the eyes can you get trying to focus then recompose at a 2.8 aperture using the center AF point?

Should I stop trying to use 2.8 to get bokeh and get it by moving my subject away from the background instead, and just settle on a standard aperture like 4 for portraits so that the focus on the eyes would be better? Then I could just use my center AF point and not have to worry about moving out of the dof area when recomposing?

Just wanting some thoughts on this stuff.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Apr 27, 2012 15:34 |  #2

I use focus recompose for pretty much every shot. Even with lower apertures than 2.8. I rarely notice a shift in AF unless im making a drastic composition change.


Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeblack2022
Goldmember
3,005 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2011
Location: The Great White North
     
Apr 27, 2012 15:34 |  #3

This has been discussed here:

https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1024777

If you look at the bottom left of the page, the forum has also done a thread search for you under "similar threads".


Joel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dharrisphotog
Goldmember
Avatar
2,331 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Apr 27, 2012 15:37 |  #4

I always compose and focus.

Nothing wrong with 2.8 if you pay attention to the distance from your subject.


D800 | Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art | Nikkor 85mm 1.8G | Nikkor 70-200 2.8G
Gear | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Apr 27, 2012 15:37 |  #5

Firstly, I never use "all-points" AF, as that is simply telling the camera to choose what it thinks the subject is and focus on that. It doesn't know to focus on the eyes, so may pick that or something else entirely, which is what you seem to be seeing in your results. I always choose the focus point I want, nearest to where I want to focus, and use that.

Have you tried selecting one of the off centre points and using that? Either by placing it over the eye and taking the shot without any recomposing (may require a little cropping later to remove dead space) or recomposing as you do with the centre point, but obviously not as much so the effect will be less.

Also, be aware that when recomposing it is possible that you may be moving slightly backwards or forwards, many photographers have a tendency to lean in slightly as they take the shot, without realising it. That can affect the focus if you have locked it to recompose. Similarly, are you sure the model isn't moving, often they move around noticeably whilst moving from pose to pose and, again, if your focus is locked it can cause the shot to look oof.

The whole focus recompose thing can make a difference with certain apertures, and distance to subject, although f/2.8 should be okay for most things with minimal recomposing. It could be that your problem is more down to additional fore/aft movement of the camera or movement of your model whilst recomposing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CincyTriGuy
Senior Member
Avatar
567 posts
Likes: 122
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
     
Apr 28, 2012 09:53 |  #6

Focus and recompose with my 9 point 50D always worked fine.


Jason
Canon 1DX Mark II | 16-35 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photobug7d
Senior Member
385 posts
Gallery: 24 photos
Likes: 110
Joined Jun 2010
     
Apr 28, 2012 10:21 |  #7

Wrong section.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pbelarge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Westchester County, NY
     
Apr 28, 2012 10:44 |  #8

CincyTriGuy wrote in post #14343397 (external link)
Focus and recompose with my 9 point 50D always worked fine.

Were you set at 2.8? This can make recomposing more difficult as the plane of focus is shallow and moving the camera, even tilting it some can make a difference in the focal distance - especially for those with a "good eye" ;)


just a few of my thoughts...
Pierre

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,778 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
OK, please advise about focus points
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1459 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.