Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 30 Apr 2012 (Monday) 05:27
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

B&W male portrait (headshot)

 
fi20100
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Apr 30, 2012 05:27 |  #1

Looking for some C&C for this headshot of my brother-in-law. Especially interested in critique concerning post processing and lighting.

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8151/7105756087_b1f0ac035c_o_d.jpg

Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
k-lo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,316 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Lost in SN's Canon vs Nikon Thread
     
Apr 30, 2012 05:44 |  #2

First, great tones and lighting! What throws me off (this might be minor) is the depth of field, it's almost like a circular mask was applied and given a lens blur effect. But overall a very nice headshot! Congrats.


-=Karlo=- 1D III, 5D Mark II, 17-40 4 L, 35 1.4 L 24-70 2.8 L, 135mm 2.0 L, 85mm 1.2 L II, 300mm f 2.8 L, 580EX II, and a crapload of Elinchrom Gear :cool:
View my flickr sets (external link)
Check out my Modelmayhem port (external link)
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Apr 30, 2012 06:14 |  #3

k-lo wrote in post #14351973 (external link)
First, great tones and lighting! What throws me off (this might be minor) is the depth of field, it's almost like a circular mask was applied and given a lens blur effect. But overall a very nice headshot! Congrats.

Thank you, and you are correct. I tried using PS CS6 Beta Iris blur, and I understand there's especially a discrepency when it comes to the nose and chin.

Before I applied the blur I felt like the sharpness of the shirt, side of his head and the ear somehow toke part of the focus away from his eyes. It was shot @ 200mm f/11 on the 5D.

Here's what it look like without the blur:

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8149/6981845380_a8fa6e099c_o_d.jpg

Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hannya
Goldmember
Avatar
1,062 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Apr 2008
Location: UK
     
Apr 30, 2012 06:43 |  #4

I prefer it without the blur. Nice shot. My only crit is shame you chopped off the top of his head and the light on the shirt is a bit too bright - perhaps tone that down.


“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sports Pics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
Apr 30, 2012 06:47 |  #5

Hannya wrote in post #14352098 (external link)
I prefer it without the blur. Nice shot. My only crit is shame you chopped off the top of his head and the light on the shirt is a bit too bright - perhaps tone that down.

Thank you. About the crop; I was under the impression that in a tight headshot you usually cut out just the top of the head. I did all the copping in camera, but I did several shots that wasn't as tight. However, I felt that they felt more formal while the tighter crop made it feel more intimate.


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hannya
Goldmember
Avatar
1,062 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Apr 2008
Location: UK
     
Apr 30, 2012 08:33 |  #6

fi20100 wrote in post #14352110 (external link)
Thank you. About the crop; I was under the impression that in a tight headshot you usually cut out just the top of the head. I did all the copping in camera, but I did several shots that wasn't as tight. However, I felt that they felt more formal while the tighter crop made it feel more intimate.

I guess that's down to taste, but I just feel that his hair is interesting, with the grey/blond bit in front and the texture, its just a shame you can't enjoy it all :)


“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sports Pics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CSMFoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,178 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2011
     
Apr 30, 2012 08:42 |  #7

k-lo wrote in post #14351973 (external link)
First, great tones and lighting! What throws me off (this might be minor) is the depth of field, it's almost like a circular mask was applied and given a lens blur effect. But overall a very nice headshot! Congrats.

Amen to this. Why such shallow DOF? When you think of studio work and adequate lighting, you think of sharp detail throughout right? I like the shot with all the detail shown better.


Facebook (external link) | CSM Photography (external link) | Gear
I got some camera's & lens'.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,983 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2010
     
Apr 30, 2012 09:58 |  #8

I like it sans-blur too. I would clone out the lower of the dual catchlights in his eyes though and maybe clone in a stronger upper catchlight in the left eye.
It's a great head shot and I'm kind of leaning toward wanting to see the rest of his hair because of the blond streak being so unusual - I want to see how far back it goes.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Slightly late
Avatar
3,587 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Finland
     
May 01, 2012 06:49 |  #9

Thanks guys :)


Stefan
5D3, 5Dc, 5Dc, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickr (external link), 5∞px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
green_tooth
Member
Avatar
90 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
     
May 01, 2012 07:06 |  #10

The one without the blur looks much better.
Great light.


Assembler Code: IBLU - Ignore Basic Laws of Universe | http://planeta-dosade.net (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
May 01, 2012 19:56 |  #11

Agree the blur isn't working. The image is quite nice, well lit and exposed. But switching to portrait mode and keeping his head about him would be in order I believe. Cropping heads and ears and such is OK for more casual portraits but not for formal stuff.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,175 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
B&W male portrait (headshot)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1405 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.