Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Dec 2005 (Sunday) 00:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Scanning negatives to digital

 
EOSX
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Dec 04, 2005 00:44 |  #1

I have probably thousands of negatives of years of photography and I want to maintain digitals of them. How costly is it to do this? Is the quality worth it?

Any other ideas would be appreciated.


Sony A7R |E 10-18 f4 | FE 24-70mm F4 OSS Vario-Tessar T* FE | 55mm F1.8 ZA Zeiss Sonnar T* | EOS M | EF-M 22 f2 STM | EF-M 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robertwgross
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,462 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2002
Location: California
     
Dec 04, 2005 02:12 |  #2

Is the quality worth it?

Worth what?

In order to maintain digital files, first you are going to have to scan them, and then store them, typically in multiple places or with multiple media. When you store them, you have to decide whether they will be online and available, or off-line and in a safe someplace.

We don't know what size the negatives are to begin with. Scanners for some sizes are relatively inexpensive, and others are costly. Unless you have high-end scanners, it takes quite a bit of time, and operator time does not come cheaply.

I have about 75GB of scanned 35mm slide images, so I've been down this road.

---Bob Gross---




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snappa
Goldmember
1,757 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Kent, UK
     
Dec 04, 2005 03:32 |  #3

I have scanned loads of negatives and to my mind it has been worth it. I would suggest that an external hard drive may be a good idea for storage. I don`t have the most powerful PC and sticking loads of scanned images on it definitely slowed it down.
I use a Nikon IV ED scanner and I am very happy with the results from negatives. It takes about 15-20 seconds to preview the negative, to see if it may be worthwhile scanning, and then about 90 seconds to scan it. This is without any adjustments which I have done later in Photoshop. Not sure whether it is the right way to do it but it works for me.
There is a feature on the Nikon scanner, and probably others, called ICE which is very helpful in that it removes any marks/scratches on the negative. No I do not work for Nikon !
Strangely I have had more problems with slides which I thought would have been easier. I suspect it may be preferable to do all the colour/brightness/cont​rast etc on the scanner rather than leave it to Photoshop. The ICE application is not recommended for slides so the slides have to be pristeen/dust free. Even then any dust/marks may be cloned out in Photoshop.
Bought my scanner on eBay from a very nice chap in Lexington with a view to scanning and then reselling. However as the previous post mentions it does take some time.
Hope this helps.


www.pbase.com/snapz (external link)
http://www.johns-snapz.co.uk (external link)
http://Johnssnaps.zenf​olio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Dec 04, 2005 09:34 |  #4

What resolution do you need? This was my cobbled solutionfor 6MB "scans".


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOSX
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
408 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Virginia, USA
     
Dec 04, 2005 10:56 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #5

Thanks everyone. I have 35mm slides and negatives that I want to preserve in digital. I even went out ot purchase a 250GB drive for my new digitals (RAW) and now looking to convert my negs over. Appears this is going to be a lengthy process.


Sony A7R |E 10-18 f4 | FE 24-70mm F4 OSS Vario-Tessar T* FE | 55mm F1.8 ZA Zeiss Sonnar T* | EOS M | EF-M 22 f2 STM | EF-M 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TwoBit
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
13 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
     
Dec 04, 2005 11:54 |  #6

I am currently nearing the end of transfering about 3500 slides to digital. The process is simple enough, however the time involved is quite long. I am using a Nikon 5000 ED with slide feeder, the resultant images a at 4000dpi 16 bit/pixel in TIFF format, about 120 MB per image. The JPEGS are about 5MB an image.
I can get through about 240 images in a 9 hour day. Slides dont require alot of bit diddling so they go pretty fast. Negative needs more care but is still pretty quick. The quality of the TIFF files is excellent and they can be pushed around quite a bit to modify or fix them.
The equivlant megapixels to a camera is about 20MP at 48bit. One big drawback is only about 40 images per DVD. but DVD's are cheap so not really a problem.


Two Bit Digital
Canon G3
Nikon Super Coolscan 5000 ED
Canon 8400F Flatbed
3.06GHz P4 2GB RAM
Pair of LG 1952TX LCD's
Matrox RT.X100 editing.
More other stuff than required.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snappa
Goldmember
1,757 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Kent, UK
     
Dec 04, 2005 13:00 |  #7

TwoBit, You appear to be the very chap that can help me please. I too am using a Nikon scanner but the IV ED instead of the 5000. I have had no problems whatsoever with negatives but would appreciate any help you could give me re ; slides.
I have been advised not to use the ICE feature on slides which means they have to be spotlessly clean for a start. I have also found that the colours on a scanned slide seem to be very saturated.
Any advice would be much appreciated.


www.pbase.com/snapz (external link)
http://www.johns-snapz.co.uk (external link)
http://Johnssnaps.zenf​olio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,905 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Scanning negatives to digital
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1307 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.