Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 30 Apr 2012 (Monday) 21:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First shots in new home studio

 
tmoore323
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
Apr 30, 2012 21:28 |  #1

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/6984258836_d2cca639f4_b.jpg

Had to use my favorite model, C&C Welcome

http://farm8.staticfli​ckr.com …30342219_af9e3c​7d78_b.jpg (external link)

http://farm9.staticfli​ckr.com …30341595_26601b​6422_b.jpg (external link)

http://farm8.staticfli​ckr.com …84257106_6f7cbe​0b7d_b.jpg (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpam.pix
Goldmember
1,275 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Apr 2011
     
Apr 30, 2012 21:37 |  #2

#2 looks like it hurts.
It also has a perspective that makes her head look almost cartoonish in size. Maybe it's the background...did you photoshop the green background in?
I don't know how to improve upon the capture for perspective...maybe a tele lens from across the room?

You're lucky to have such a photogenic and agreeable model. She looks like she enjoys showing off for the camera.


1D-III with stuff to stick on it:
70-200L, 28-70L, 24-105L, 300L, 50, 10-17 fish, 2.0x TC
Image editing OK, encouraged, and expected. Thank you for helping me learn!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmoore323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
Apr 30, 2012 21:41 |  #3

Not sure what you mean by "it hurts" :) trying to keep her from doing contorsionst poses was actually painful for me :)

All were taken with a 28-135 lens...


Yes, she is an agreeable and fun model :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Martin ­ Dixon
Slit-scan project master
Avatar
1,867 posts
Gallery: 59 photos
Likes: 276
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Ealing
     
May 01, 2012 06:21 |  #4

IMHO the backgrounds are too intrusive - they look photoshopped in? Perhaps much wider aperture to focus in on the subject.


flickr (external link) Editing OK (external link) www.slitcam.com (free slit-scan utility) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimMcrae
Senior Member
Avatar
938 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Edinburgh
     
May 01, 2012 07:16 |  #5

I agree about the backgrounds and would prefer more plain, nondescript backgrounds - possibly white - but maybe that's just personal opinion.

#1 I like, but maybe better if she was looking at the camera?
#2 I think would be better with her feet. :)
#3 & 4 I think are really good.

All in all, very nice.


60d, 400d, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, 580ex II, 2 X 430ex II, Bowens 500, cs5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmoore323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
May 01, 2012 08:11 |  #6

Thanks, the background is a Green Screen and the backdrops are generated - maybe less busy backdrops and perhaps not as bright?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Firemike
" lingering odor "
Avatar
3,992 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 459
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan USA
     
May 01, 2012 08:54 |  #7

tmoore323 wrote in post #14359354 (external link)
Thanks, the background is a Green Screen and the backdrops are generated - maybe less busy backdrops and perhaps not as bright?

A agree, they take away from the subject, tone them down a little, and maybe blur the background some to bring out the subject. In the 4th one the hotspots are over-powering everything


Michael
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmoore323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
May 01, 2012 09:00 |  #8

Firemike wrote in post #14359536 (external link)
A agree, they take away from the subject, tone them down a little, and maybe blur the background some to bring out the subject. In the 4th one the hotspots are over-powering everything

I assume you mean hotspots in the backdrops, and yea I can see that now. I like the flexibility of a green screen but can see how the backdrops can take away from the subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimMcrae
Senior Member
Avatar
938 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Edinburgh
     
May 01, 2012 11:32 |  #9

tmoore323 wrote in post #14359354 (external link)
Thanks, the background is a Green Screen and the backdrops are generated - maybe less busy backdrops and perhaps not as bright?

Yup, but that's just my take on it. I think there's loads of interest in the little girl and her gymnastic poses, and the coloured/textured backgrounds just detract from that and make it look less natural... As I said, a plain or gymnasium type of background would be better in my opinion.

On the green screen thing, does it work well? I've never used the chroma key thing, although I have replaced backgrounds manually a few times and found it to be painstakingly and mind-numbingly boring, especially where hair is concerned! I like to keep pp to a minimum... born lazy! :)


60d, 400d, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, 580ex II, 2 X 430ex II, Bowens 500, cs5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmoore323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
May 01, 2012 12:42 |  #10

JimMcrae wrote in post #14360511 (external link)
Yup, but that's just my take on it. I think there's loads of interest in the little girl and her gymnastic poses, and the coloured/textured backgrounds just detract from that and make it look less natural... As I said, a plain or gymnasium type of background would be better in my opinion.

On the green screen thing, does it work well? I've never used the chroma key thing, although I have replaced backgrounds manually a few times and found it to be painstakingly and mind-numbingly boring, especially where hair is concerned! I like to keep pp to a minimum... born lazy! :)

You have to be sure to light it very evenly - and obviously make sure the talent doesn't wear anything green :) but yes as long as you don't over flash/light the hair it's pretty easy to key the green screen out. Just make sure the talent isn't right on top of the green screen either, if you can get at least 2-3 feet away I found it works the best.


Keepin the green reflection out of the sparklies in this shoot was interesting, but wanted to fully test this new set up so figured this was the best way :) I have some with a different outfit and bright silver pom poms that I took as well in this shoot :)

I'll put up a few more photos from this shoot after work tonight with plain backgrounds behind her - not a fan of plain white, but that seems to be the trend anymore so I'll do some that way as well...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimMcrae
Senior Member
Avatar
938 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Edinburgh
     
May 01, 2012 13:09 |  #11

Right, thanks for that.

Look forward to seeing the photos! :)


60d, 400d, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, 580ex II, 2 X 430ex II, Bowens 500, cs5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmoore323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
May 05, 2012 16:40 |  #12

Another without the "80's" back drop :)

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7071/7146254149_3f822e0d30_b.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimMcrae
Senior Member
Avatar
938 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Edinburgh
     
May 06, 2012 20:04 |  #13

Yes!! :)


60d, 400d, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, 580ex II, 2 X 430ex II, Bowens 500, cs5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StosPhotography
Senior Member
286 posts
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 06, 2012 20:25 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

nice looks awesome! keep up the practice


FB Fan Page (external link)
Become a fan!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmoore323
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,945 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
     
May 07, 2012 08:45 |  #15

Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,417 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
First shots in new home studio
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1082 guests, 115 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.