Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 01 May 2012 (Tuesday) 21:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 24-105 Calibration needed?

 
cory1848
Goldmember
Avatar
1,884 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Kissimmee, FL
     
May 01, 2012 21:06 |  #1

I just picked up a Refurbed 24-105 from Adorama and I am concerned with sharpness at F4. I have read that a lot of people praise this lens for being sharp across the entire range and have also read people complaining about softness at F4. Stopping down to 5.6 makes a lot of difference, so much that I am questioning why F4 isn't as sharp as 5.6.

This this screenshot image from DPP, the left shot is at F4 and the right shot is at 5.6. Would this difference warrant a calibration? Or a return? Really soft on the eyelid at F4. IS was on, handheld at 200, ISO 400 with direct ETTL flash.

I shoot wide open all the time so it is a concern for me. Similar results throughout the focal range. I tested at 24, 50 and 105. I applied -3 MA to it because it was back focusing during testing. On a 5D2 body.

Thanks

http://fixedfocus.us/i​mages/Canon24-105Test.png (external link)


Gear List
"Those are some mighty fine pots and pans you have, they must make a great dinner!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
va_rider
Goldmember
Avatar
2,378 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Staunton, VA
     
May 01, 2012 21:07 |  #2

the left shot is also focuses on an area with very little contrast, while the shot on the right, the focus point is sitting on an area with a lot of contrast.


Canon 5dmkIII, Sigma 15mm f/2.8FE; 35mm f/1.4; Canon EF70-200 f/2.8L IS II; --- YN560 x 7
I'm not a professional photographer, and I don't want to be.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cory1848
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,884 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Kissimmee, FL
     
May 01, 2012 21:17 |  #3

va_rider wrote in post #14363624 (external link)
the left shot is also focuses on an area with very little contrast, while the shot on the right, the focus point is sitting on an area with a lot of contrast.

It had no problem locking on though. If there wasn't enough contrast, wouldn't it hunt until there was? I need to be able to trust the AF. When it says locked, it needs to be sharp.


Gear List
"Those are some mighty fine pots and pans you have, they must make a great dinner!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
va_rider
Goldmember
Avatar
2,378 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Staunton, VA
     
May 01, 2012 21:22 |  #4

there are too many variables there... you're shooting a person that moves... maybe you're on a tripod, maybe not... using "One Shot" focus, if the person moves at all from the time you lock focus, to the time the button is all of the way down, you're left with a OOF shot....

If you're really concerned, and really want to check.... put the camera on a tripod. find something with high contrast to shoot at. use 2 sec delay to eliminate shake.


Canon 5dmkIII, Sigma 15mm f/2.8FE; 35mm f/1.4; Canon EF70-200 f/2.8L IS II; --- YN560 x 7
I'm not a professional photographer, and I don't want to be.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
May 01, 2012 23:03 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

va_rider wrote in post #14363722 (external link)
there are too many variables there... you're shooting a person that moves... maybe you're on a tripod, maybe not... using "One Shot" focus, if the person moves at all from the time you lock focus, to the time the button is all of the way down, you're left with a OOF shot....

+1

Too many variables. No exif info. Test the lens on tripod and if it's ok then there's no one to blame but yourself.


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,354 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Canon 24-105 Calibration needed?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1598 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.