Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Dec 2005 (Sunday) 11:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Noise Ninja - Which version?

 
BearLeeAlive
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Dec 04, 2005 11:54 |  #1

I have played around with a few noise reduction programs and have concluded to buy Noise Ninja.

It seems to be best to have the bundle that plugs in to Adobe (right now using PE3) as I am there processing images anyway. And it does come as a stand alone version too. Is this what others use?

The big question. Is it worthwhile to upgrade to the Pro bundle? Is their an advantage to processing at 16 bit compared to 8 bit as I have to reduce to 8 bit to do most other processing anyway. The other advantages seem to be batch processing and multiprocessing support. I do't seem to need to reduce noise on many images (maybe 2% tops) so would I benefit.

I am only an avid amateur photography shooting mostly candids, with a far biit of macro & landscape, and plan on a mini-studio setup in time. I do find I have to push the ISO often as I do shoot a fair bit under low light conditions. I also plan to upgrade to CS2 in time.

Maybe for only $35 more I should just bite the bullet and get the Pro Bundle anyway.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Dec 04, 2005 12:25 |  #2

I strongly believe in editing in 16-bit mode, but many don't. Perhaps a little research will tell you if you need or want the 16-bit PS plugin version. It doesn't sound like you need batch processing capabilities though, so that's a tough call just for 16-bit support.

I would most definitely get the plugin version nut just because it's convenient to use in PS but because you can use much of PS's power while reducing noise. Things like masks can make a huge difference in the end results, allowing you to protect the edges from the NR process.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 04, 2005 14:53 |  #3

I only ever use the standalone NN when I have a large number of images to process - usually I use the PS plugin. I bought the best version because I sometimes use 16-bit, but it wouldn't bother me to only have the 8 bit version either.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Dec 04, 2005 17:26 |  #4

Last time I checked, the cost to upgrade is equal to the price difference between the two versions. It's the same software, just a different license that enables the expanded capabilities.

So start with the basic version, and if you someday decide you need the pro license, it won't cost you any more than if you had bought that in the first place.

That's what I did. I upgraded for the batch processing capability alone, because I process large bunches of theatre shots at ISO 1600. Everyone's needs are different.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BearLeeAlive
THREAD ­ STARTER
All butt cheeks and string.
Avatar
30,200 posts
Likes: 70
Joined May 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Dec 04, 2005 18:02 |  #5

Thanks for the input all.

Curtis, thanks for pointing out the upgrades to me. You are right, it would cost exactly the same to buy the Home bundle, then upgrade if I need to as I am not too sure that I would need the batch processing. The main reason I would get it would be for the 16-bit processing. For that reason I will do a bit of researching. I guess I might as well start here to find out the pros and cons of 16-bit over 8-bit processing.

I have quite a good understanding of photography right up to and including the image capture, but beyong that the world of post processing sure is a big daunting one with lots and lots to learn. I am slowly getting their but still have a long way to go.


-JIM-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Dec 04, 2005 20:35 as a reply to  @ BearLeeAlive's post |  #6

BearLeeAlive wrote:
...but beyong that the world of post processing sure is a big daunting one with lots and lots to learn. I am slowly getting their but still have a long way to go.

I've been running Photoshop since it came out, and I'm still learning every day and there's still lots to learn. :wink:


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,828 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Noise Ninja - Which version?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1613 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.