Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 02 May 2012 (Wednesday) 20:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Android users targeted in drive-by download attacks

 
isoMorphic
Goldmember
Avatar
2,090 posts
Joined May 2008
     
May 02, 2012 20:32 |  #1

"Based on our current research, NotCompatible is a new Android trojan that appears to serve as a simple TCP relay/proxy while posing as a system update," the advisory stated. "This threat does not currently appear to cause any direct harm to a target device, but could potentially be used to gain illicit access to private networks by turning an infected Android device into a proxy."

http://arstechnica.com …e-by-download-attacks.ars (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
May 03, 2012 16:14 |  #2

This is why iOS is closed.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bikeboynate
Goldmember
Avatar
3,127 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: San Francisco
     
May 03, 2012 16:29 |  #3

Note to self - Do not system update my cellphone anymore-

Thanks for the heads up. ;)


-Nate :D
5D Mark lll + BG-E11 | 60D + BG-E9 | Rebel XSi |
17-40 f/4L | 24-105 f/4L | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | EX430II x 2 |
055XPROB | 322RC2 | Street Walker HardDrive |
Flickr (external link) | My website: NMBPhoto (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
isoMorphic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,090 posts
Joined May 2008
     
May 03, 2012 21:19 |  #4

Tony-S wrote in post #14374742 (external link)
This is why iOS is closed.

I wont even get into the debate of open vs closed environments as it's pointless. But just so you are aware Windows is closed too. And half the underlaying software technologies that make devices work today stem from both closed and open software. You may not actually know this but both Apple and Windows like every other OS are actually based on Unix at the core. OSX is actually a BSD variant like Sun and FreeBSD that was built and expanded upon previously existing technology.

http://support.apple.c​om/kb/TA25632?viewloca​le=en_US (external link)
http://en.wikipedia.or​g …_of_BSD_operati​ng_systems (external link)

And if you think Android is the only vulnerable OS just you wait and see what the future holds for iOS.

http://techfragments.c​om …eads_By_SMS_Mes​sages.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
May 03, 2012 22:44 |  #5

Sadly, Windows is NOT a Unix like, and went on for ages lacking some of the most basic protections offered by a Unix like environment, and even today is still less secure by design. It was built up over the years to avoid paying to license a Unix like environment to build off of. (And it has been a very nice system to work with for the most part.)

Open or closed source, it doesn't matter. If I want to I can take apart a closed source program and look at what each and every command does. (This is how they can actually run on a computer, all those "zeros and ones" actually mean something.) Sure, it is a lot harder to read, is a lot slower, and generally a larger pain, but perfectly doable. Once I know how something works, I can break it. (On purpose. With computers and software it is extremely easy to 'break' things by accident as well.)

But the thing about an open source community? I'm not reliant on some company to get around to fixing some issue. I don't have to wait for some bean counter to decide that the company will save more money fixing the issue than settling the few lawsuits that come up or off set the losses in customer base because people lose faith in the product.

But flip the coin around and most major close sourced projects are backed by major finances and can afford to dedicate staff to fixing issues, rather than relying on a community of often part time volunteers to take a fancy to something and make it their pet project.

Open or Closed, they're all just as open to attack and errors, and there is no great difference in the greater scheme of things.

So really, iOS isn't closed and limited for your protection. It is closed and limited for the purpose of lining the coffers at Apple, to make their lives easier, and to limit what a competitor can do to take advantage of a wide range of decent projects.


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
May 03, 2012 23:31 |  #6

isoMorphic wrote in post #14376206 (external link)
And if you think Android is the only vulnerable OS just you wait and see what the future holds for iOS.

I'm still waiting on it to happen to OS X. It's been 12 years and nothing major has occurred. Android, on the other hand, has had many attacks. iOS - none.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
isoMorphic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,090 posts
Joined May 2008
     
May 04, 2012 01:46 |  #7

Tony-S wrote in post #14376830 (external link)
It's been 12 years and nothing major has occurred.

Maybe you have been safe for 12 years but that does not mean Mac systems have been immune for all those years. The problem is that Apple users are often the type who want to believe that magical unicorns are inside protecting computer. So they still buy into the hype which made so many MacHeads believe that Mac was completely impenetrable. Another part of it is that most media agencies run on Mac and most have special licensing deals with Apple. So they aren't going to bite the hand that feeds them.

For your reading enjoyment.

http://gizmodo.com …ruses-better-than-windows (external link)

http://www.sophos.com …s/2006/02/macos​xleap.aspx (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com …le-mac-trojan-horse-wild/ (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com …kdoor-trojan-now-in-beta/ (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com …ac-malware-evolves-apple/ (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com …door-variants-discovered/ (external link)
http://www.slashgear.c​om …-x-anti-malware-19189441/ (external link)
http://abcnews.go.com …infects-600000-computers/ (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com/2012/04/03/m​ac-malware-java/ (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com …6/sabpab-trojan-mac-word/ (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com …alware-whose-fault-is-it/ (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com/2012/04/24/m​ac-malware-study/ (external link)
http://nakedsecurity.s​ophos.com …04/27/python-malware-mac/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
May 04, 2012 07:53 |  #8

isoMorphic wrote in post #14377255 (external link)
Maybe you have been safe for 12 years but that does not mean Mac systems have been immune for all those years. The problem is that Apple users are often the type who want to believe that magical unicorns are inside protecting computer.

No, we just go by the historical data. You can point to lots of potential issues, but the reality any given Mac has virtually no chance of having malware on it, particularly if you avoid unscrupulous web sites. They just don't spread. So...

Ho, hum.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Codda
Member
229 posts
Likes: 10
Joined May 2011
     
May 04, 2012 07:59 |  #9

isoMorphic wrote in post #14376206 (external link)
I wont even get into the debate of open vs closed environments as it's pointless.

And if you think Android is the only vulnerable OS just you wait and see what the future holds for iOS.

http://techfragments.c​om …eads_By_SMS_Mes​sages.html (external link)

No debate here...move on please....;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
isoMorphic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,090 posts
Joined May 2008
     
May 04, 2012 08:37 |  #10

Tony-S wrote in post #14377999 (external link)
particularly if you avoid unscrupulous web sites. They just don't spread. So...

The same argument can also be made for Android.

Which has nothing to do with "unscrupulous web sites" and more to do with sites run by people who lack the understanding or don't care about security. That goes for almost anyone running a Word Press Blog or any popular script be it open source or not. In fact the very software that runs this forum has been the target of numerous attacks over the years which could potentially infect your Super Mac at anytime.

Btw are Religious sites unscrupulous since they too can spread bad stuff?

http://news.yahoo.com …uses-study-192552733.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
May 04, 2012 08:56 |  #11

isoMorphic wrote in post #14378122 (external link)
In fact the very software that runs this forum has been the target of numerous attacks over the years which could potentially infect your Super Mac at anytime.

My Super Mac has been retired for years.

Btw are Religious sites unscrupulous since they too can spread bad stuff?

Yes, but for other reasons. ;)

The sky is not falling.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,308 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Android users targeted in drive-by download attacks
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is josetide
982 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.