Does anyone know if this is an OK one to get? I'm not looking for top quality, but I dont want it to break on the first use lol.
http://www.amazon.com …?ie=UTF8&m=A1P9QRDRYY6FXL![]()
Looking for a Variable ND filter for around that price range.
Shutterwolf Senior Member 523 posts Joined Apr 2012 Location: California More info | May 03, 2012 21:33 | #1 Permanent banDoes anyone know if this is an OK one to get? I'm not looking for top quality, but I dont want it to break on the first use lol. Josh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saint728 Goldmember 2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | May 03, 2012 23:58 | #2 Total junk, don't waste your money. Either buy a good one like Singh-Ray's Vari-ND for $390.00 or go without. Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 00:10 | #3 Permanent banDamn... I dont have the kind of money to spend that much on a filter, yet i still want to do the kind of shots i need that filter for... There has to be a good or atleast descent low cost option. Im not using white lenses, so its not like it would be a disgrace to the lens or anything lol. A $340 dollar filter is proably nothing to someone with thousands of dollars in camera gear, but to someone on a budget, there has to be a way... Josh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saint728 Goldmember 2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | May 04, 2012 00:39 | #4 If your on a budget and you want to do long exposure shots I would go with a couple different screw on filters made by B+W. Here are all the different ND filters B+W have. http://www.bhphotovideo.com …595+4291599900+4294955265 Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 00:52 | #5 Permanent banThanks, I dont know what one i would need though. What strength of ND (I think thats what its called) From that selection, I would guess the .6 would be best for me, price wise... Not sure a .3 would do much... though i have never used a ND before so I wouldnt know. Josh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timeasterday Senior Member 960 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Anderson, SC More info | May 04, 2012 07:32 | #6 Do you have a CPL filter? That already gets you about 2 stops. If you don't have one that should be your first investment. Then get a 0.9 (3-stop) ND to add to the CPL for a total of 5 stops (but be careful with vignetting). Those two filters cover about 90% of my needs. I do have a 10-stop ND for that other 10% of the time I want more of a special effect. 7DMKII, 5DMKII, Canon 17-40L, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Canon 70-200mmL f/2.8 II, Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Zeiss ZE 50mm Makro Planar, Rokinon 14mm f/2.8, Kenko Pro 300 DG 1.4x TC, Canon 2X III TC, 580EX II x2, YN560, RF603's
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 10:03 | #7 Permanent bantimeasterday wrote in post #14377910 Do you have a CPL filter? That already gets you about 2 stops. If you don't have one that should be your first investment. Then get a 0.9 (3-stop) ND to add to the CPL for a total of 5 stops (but be careful with vignetting). Those two filters cover about 90% of my needs. I do have a 10-stop ND for that other 10% of the time I want more of a special effect. I have a CPL for my 58mm, but not the 72mm. There is no way I can get both for the 72mm right now, and I'm going to the coast soon so I was hoping to try a ND at the beach. I used the CPL in Yosemite for a couple slow shots of a creek, but it was in lots of shade, not direct sun... Direct sun would have made it impossible with only a CPL since even in the shade with the f stop as high as i could go and 100 ISO, I was barely able to get a good long exposure without it being too bright. Worst case, I will just have to try it after sunset if were still at the beach, but I would like to try some during the day as well. Josh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saint728 Goldmember 2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | May 04, 2012 14:35 | #8 For long exposures in the daylight I would get the B+W #110 10 stop filter. This will work well for the daytime long exposures as well as sunrise/sunset pictures too. It will also be great for waterfalls or rivers for the smoky effect. If you can afford it buy the filter with the MRC coating. http://www.bhphotovideo.com …mm_110_Solid_Neutral.html Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
goldboughtrue Goldmember 1,857 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Colorado More info | May 04, 2012 18:48 | #9 Permanent banA CPL at the beach would do you more good than an ND filter because the CPL can reduce glare off rocks and reflections in the water. If you can stop down and use the CPL, it should be close to a strong ND filter. Unless you want very long exposures. Then it would be better to do beach shots in very early morning or evening when there is little light. http://www.pbase.com/goldbough
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andrew_WOT Goldmember 1,421 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: CA More info | May 04, 2012 22:20 | #10 CPL - 2 stops
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2125 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||