 | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
May 04, 2012 12:53 | #1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StaticMedia Senior Member 875 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 13:07 | #2 Nice! I like this one a lot. Great use of horizon and contrast. Well done!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RACINGHART03 Senior Member  908 posts Likes: 21 Joined Feb 2012 More info | May 04, 2012 14:37 | #3 There is a little lens distortion on the building. Looks a tad oversharpened and underexposed. I The beach and shoreline look nice. I think I would have opted to crop out everything left of the grassline and made it a beach shot. Thx for posting! 500PX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WadeAngle's Mostly Lurking 10 posts Joined Apr 2012 More info | May 04, 2012 14:50 | #4 Love the colors and line of the beach leading off into the distance. I like the over-sharpened look for this photo. Wade - Customer Experience Rep @ CanvasPop
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StaticMedia Senior Member 875 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 15:27 | #5 RACINGHART03 wrote in post #14379868  There is a little lens distortion on the building. Looks a tad oversharpened and underexposed. I The beach and shoreline look nice. I think I would have opted to crop out everything left of the grassline and made it a beach shot. Thx for posting! I was kinda thinking the same. I was holding up paper to the image here at work trying to visualize a crop. I think it might be neat to crop it at the center of the condo. cutting the condo in half. this way you are removing the left side that is a but confusing (other than the nice sky there) and keeping that island of landscaping that meets the blacktop in the bottom foreground.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 04, 2012 17:24 | #6 Thanks for the comments everyone! The idea was to show the contrast between the city (underexposed) and the ocean (brighter and sharpened). This may not have worked out all that well
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StaticMedia Senior Member 875 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2011 More info | May 04, 2012 17:45 | #7 rioni wrote in post #14380626 Thanks for the comments everyone! The idea was to show the contrast between the city (underexposed) and the ocean (brighter and sharpened). This may not have worked out all that well  I get what you are saying. The sky above the city portion is Great! My visual mind is having an argument. But the landscape below is lacking. Partially due to the sunlight but also due to the geometry. Still a great photo though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NumLock Member 59 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: Australia More info | May 04, 2012 22:07 | #8 Aside from the slight tilt of the building it is a wonderful shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1625 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
