Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 05 May 2012 (Saturday) 22:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5DIII vs 1DIV

 
Stone ­ 13
Goldmember
Avatar
1,690 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Huntersville, NC
     
May 05, 2012 22:28 |  #1

I have a 1DIV sitting next to me right now and I've only had time to squeeze off a few frames today around noon in absolutely horrid light, yet the files appear to be light years ahead of the files from my 7D from an IQ and PP perspective.

Sharpness SOOC has been the biggest eye opener so far. Hopefully I'll get some decent light tomorrow so I can get a better feel for the 1DIV, but right now I'm wondering how much better the 5DIII would be over and above the 1DIV because I'm very impressed with it so far, probably not that hard since most of my experience has been on crop bodies.

I know or I've heard the 5DIII high ISO is roughly 1/2 to 3/4 stop better than the 1DV but I'm more concerned about the advantage in overall IQ. How advantageous has the extra 6MP been? How much better are the raw files?

I can either buy the 1DIV I have here now or go ahead and place my order for a 5DIII. So to those who've shot both, was the 5DIII worth it? I'll be keeping my 7D btw, not that it makes any difference....


Ken
Fujifilm X100T | 5D III gripped |35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Neal1029
Member
Avatar
101 posts
Joined Jun 2011
     
May 05, 2012 23:10 |  #2

I have both now. While the 5DMK III is an amazing tool and shows great end results, with only great possibilities ahead, the MK IV is still one hell of a picture taking machine. It's proven, rigid and reliable.
They are different bodies in terms of user needs. Define what you need and expect, I'm sure you have researched all the specs of both bodies. This discussion could go on for years to come. You won't be disappointed by either. For me and what I need and want, if I had to choose one...it would be the MK IV


5DMK III,16-35L 2.8, 24-70L 2.8, 70-200L 2.8 IS II, 580 EX II x 2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
May 05, 2012 23:17 |  #3

I sold my 1Div after getting the 5Diii, but only because I picked up another 7D too (which I have sold in the past).

5Diii is FF, more MP, etc so when you can frame your subject (ie. non telephoto situations), it's better IQ, especially vs 7D (of course).

The 1Div IQ is very close to the 5Diii and is a much better body in general. However, the 1Div has a huge focusing weakness in low light and the 5Diii nails it.

So my logic was, if I can't use the 1Div in low light due to focus, and I can't use a 7D in low light because higher ISOs suck (IMO), what's the difference? None! Dumped the 1Div and picked up the 7D for the reach (crop MPs) and have the 5Diii for low light and basically anything that isn't telephoto lens limited (5Diii AF also is better than the 7D).


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skater911
Goldmember
Avatar
1,281 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 05, 2012 23:17 |  #4

I haven't shot my 5d very much, but I can say it is not wow look at the difference. There are things that I love so much with the 1d that makes me not want to use the 5d. (I just have to get use to it, to be honest). I will say I like the view finder, button layout and the old style of the af of the 1d (changeable screens style instead of the newer LCD style of the 5d. Now with that said the 5d low light is just crazy. I was playing with it outside tonight and purposely picking a dark house that I could see any detail. The 1d could not focus where the 5d was almost instant. So there are good and bad about both.


Nikon D850 l Nikon 28 1.4E l Nikon 50 1.8 g l Nikon 24-120 F4 l Tamron 100-400 l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skater911
Goldmember
Avatar
1,281 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 05, 2012 23:18 as a reply to  @ skater911's post |  #5

@ Higgs

You know you will just get the 1dx when It comes outs. Hahahaha


Nikon D850 l Nikon 28 1.4E l Nikon 50 1.8 g l Nikon 24-120 F4 l Tamron 100-400 l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stone ­ 13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,690 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Huntersville, NC
     
May 05, 2012 23:40 |  #6

I am a bit concerned about the 1DIV low light AI servo performance, i've read every one of those threads tonight. I'm worried because the camera I choose will be primarily used to shoot both my daughter's indoor school sports (volleyball, basketball and gymnastics) also, I've found myself covering more than a few corporate events over the past year. This camera will spend most of it's time indoors where I don't need the extra reach of my 7D, but I'll need to be able to lock focus quickly as there aren't any do-overs in anything I shoot.

The 6fps bothers me a bit as well. I had no idea how noticeable the 1DIV's 10fps would be compared to my 7D, but it's VERY noticeable. I'm worried that moving down to 6fps would be even more noticeable.

The 1DX would obviously solve all of these problems, but I'm just tired of waiting for it....


Ken
Fujifilm X100T | 5D III gripped |35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skater911
Goldmember
Avatar
1,281 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 06, 2012 00:39 |  #7

Stone 13 wrote in post #14386216 (external link)
I am a bit concerned about the 1DIV low light AI servo performance, i've read every one of those threads tonight. I'm worried because the camera I choose will be primarily used to shoot both my daughter's indoor school sports (volleyball, basketball and gymnastics) also, I've found myself covering more than a few corporate events over the past year. This camera will spend most of it's time indoors where I don't need the extra reach of my 7D, but I'll need to be able to lock focus quickly as there aren't any do-overs in anything I shoot.

The 6fps bothers me a bit as well. I had no idea how noticeable the 1DIV's 10fps would be compared to my 7D, but it's VERY noticeable. I'm worried that moving down to 6fps would be even more noticeable.

The 1DX would obviously solve all of these problems, but I'm just tired of waiting for it....

if you are worried about indoor sports, I think the mkiv would be good. The only time i have noticed the difference is really, really dark. I shot a friends wedding with the 1d mkiv and 24-70 at 6400 no flash (pretty dark) no issues with it locking.


Nikon D850 l Nikon 28 1.4E l Nikon 50 1.8 g l Nikon 24-120 F4 l Tamron 100-400 l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
Avatar
3,027 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 82
Joined May 2010
Location: Lewisville, TX (DFW)
     
May 06, 2012 07:32 |  #8

Low light low contrast ai servo on the 5D is much better in my experience. I prefer iq a little better on the 5d, but that comes with trade offs. Namely, if you shoot sports, wildlife or focal length limited then the 1d is the better investment. Shooting indoors at ISO 12800, f2.8,1/640 second didn't present any focus problems in servo. The 5d af is more sure footed all around in fast action in my experience. It just grabs focus and hangs on very well (depending on your af configuration). If you like shooting with a grip then the costs between the 1d and gripped 5d is about the same.

Don't underestimate that "reach" advantage the 1d gives you. There are times a regret moving from a 1d to the 5d, but not many. If you crop a 5d to an equivalent FOV of the 1d then you end up with about a 13mp image. Not much difference. The difference is if you would have needed to crop the 1d then the difference is more apparent.

RAW manipulation between the two are roughly the same with the 5d perhaps being slightly better. Either choice and you can't go wrong.

Also if you shoot wide then the 1d is more limiting.


Jason

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
May 06, 2012 07:54 |  #9

keep in mind the cost between the gripped 5diii and the 1div being close is comparing a brand new 5diii to a used 1div with probably a significant amount of clicks, probably scuffin, buttons that have been pressed 1000 times, etc.


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
May 06, 2012 08:01 |  #10

I'm watching this debate closely -- I can say with a MKIII low light AF depends upon both lens and, of course, AF setup. I have had no session-killing problems even in concert settings + 50L.

Does anyone have a feel for whether or not the AF on the MKIV is a step backwards from the MKIII?


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
Avatar
3,027 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 82
Joined May 2010
Location: Lewisville, TX (DFW)
     
May 06, 2012 08:02 |  #11

Higgs Boson wrote in post #14387278 (external link)
keep in mind the cost between the gripped 5diii and the 1div being close is comparing a brand new 5diii to a used 1div with probably a significant amount of clicks, probably scuffin, buttons that have been pressed 1000 times, etc.

I have found some Perfect low clicks 1d bodies at $4k and less. Buying used always requires one to carefully evaluate the condition of the item.


Jason

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
Avatar
3,027 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 82
Joined May 2010
Location: Lewisville, TX (DFW)
     
May 06, 2012 08:03 |  #12

S.Horton wrote in post #14387294 (external link)
I'm watching this debate closely -- I can say with a MKIII low light AF depends upon both lens and, of course, AF setup. I have had no session-killing problems even in concert settings + 50L.

Does anyone have a feel for whether or not the AF on the MKIV is a step backwards from the MKIII?

In all scenarios I have found the 5D mark iii af better than the 1d mark iv.


Jason

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
May 06, 2012 08:06 |  #13

jase1125 wrote in post #14387297 (external link)
I have found some Perfect low clicks 1d bodies at $4k and less. Buying used always requires one to carefully evaluate the condition of the item.

oh I know I sold my iv for 3800 with 10k. that's not to say I couldn't tell a difference between it's condition and the new body. big difference. they just seem to loosen up, lose that tight feeling.


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
Avatar
3,027 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 82
Joined May 2010
Location: Lewisville, TX (DFW)
     
May 06, 2012 08:19 |  #14

Higgs Boson wrote in post #14387310 (external link)
oh I know I sold my iv for 3800 with 10k. that's not to say I couldn't tell a difference between it's condition and the new body. big difference. they just seem to loosen up, lose that tight feeling.

I didn't have that experience ( sold mine with 13k clicks). Ymmv


Jason

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
skater911
Goldmember
Avatar
1,281 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 06, 2012 08:57 |  #15

Higgs Boson wrote in post #14387310 (external link)
they just seem to loosen up, lose that tight feeling.

really. It is hard not saying office jokes about this. :)


Nikon D850 l Nikon 28 1.4E l Nikon 50 1.8 g l Nikon 24-120 F4 l Tamron 100-400 l

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,934 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
5DIII vs 1DIV
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1432 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.