Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 08 May 2012 (Tuesday) 13:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

(another) question about team shots

 
LaxMom
Member
Avatar
203 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Virginia
     
May 08, 2012 13:08 |  #1

I'm taking the team photo today for the girls Lax. When I did the boys last week, I think it came out fine, but it always seem like when they're so far away, it's hard to get their faces real sharp. I was wondering what the best settings to use are, to get the best picture. Oh, and it's pretty cloudy today.........

Thanks for any advice!!

Here is the one I did last week. I think it's ok, but the faces aren't real sharp. I'm not sure if it's because they're so far away, or because I did something wrong. Help! (this is the orginial, before my DH Photoshopped out the pole!)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


I'm also thinking that maybe it would be better to have 3 rows, so it's not so long. How do you do that, as far as who stands, who kneels, etc. Keep in mind, the girls are in skirts! lol

Canon Rebel XSi, Canon 70-200 lens
“ I always thought good photos were like good jokes. If you have to explain it, it just isn’t that good." – Anonymous

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
burnet44
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,958 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 14344
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Robinson, Texas
     
May 08, 2012 13:47 |  #2

just my ideas

1. 26 total / 3 rows=8 per row plus 2 coaches
2. first row cross leg on ground
3. 2nd row kneeling all with rt knee down
4. 3rd row standing
5. make sure players are between each other chest out show numbers
6. get a wide angle lens
7. tripod keep lines straight
8. maybe a scoreboard or press box in the back or league or park sign if possible
9. for heights Ive done it like this
line all up shortest to tallest
take a row of what you want in this case 8
divide by 2 on each side
do for the other rows
that way you get tallest in the middle

I hope I explained it ok
Maybe I didnt

kinda like a pyramid


Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
C and C welcome, Brutality Encouraged, Help Always Welcome Editing OK
www.firstdownphotos.ph​otoreflect.com (external link)
Flicker Page http://www.flickr.com/​photos/72506283@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LaxMom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
203 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Virginia
     
May 08, 2012 13:54 |  #3

burnet44 wrote in post #14399777 (external link)
just my ideas

1. 26 total / 3 rows=8 per row plus 2 coaches
2. first row cross leg on ground
3. 2nd row kneeling all with rt knee down
4. 3rd row standing
5. make sure players are between each other chest out show numbers
6. get a wide angle lens
7. tripod keep lines straight
8. maybe a scoreboard or press box in the back or league or park sign if possible
9. for heights Ive done it like this
line all up shortest to tallest
take a row of what you want in this case 8
divide by 2 on each side
do for the other rows
that way you get tallest in the middle

I hope I explained it ok
Maybe I didnt

kinda like a pyramid

Thanks!!! Now.......what settings??? ;)


Canon Rebel XSi, Canon 70-200 lens
“ I always thought good photos were like good jokes. If you have to explain it, it just isn’t that good." – Anonymous

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
burnet44
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,958 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 14344
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Robinson, Texas
     
May 08, 2012 15:08 |  #4

depending on sun
Im sure others know better
but something around f8 or so depending on ss
I personally wouldnt go past 5.6
but Im sure many who are better than me (which is all of this forums) know better than me

also use fill flash to get faces lit if needed
maybe 45 Degrees
make sure sun is behind you
have every one close their eyes because its bright
say open wait 1/2 a second and shoot em
that way ya dont get squinting


also take about 5-10 to make sure ya got one with all eyes open

and never forget
DOF

http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)

to me this thing is great

I hope that a real live pro will comment
Im just a slappy


Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
C and C welcome, Brutality Encouraged, Help Always Welcome Editing OK
www.firstdownphotos.ph​otoreflect.com (external link)
Flicker Page http://www.flickr.com/​photos/72506283@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
burnet44
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,958 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 14344
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Robinson, Texas
     
May 08, 2012 15:21 |  #5

there is also an app you can dl for your phone


Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
C and C welcome, Brutality Encouraged, Help Always Welcome Editing OK
www.firstdownphotos.ph​otoreflect.com (external link)
Flicker Page http://www.flickr.com/​photos/72506283@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
May 09, 2012 01:45 as a reply to  @ burnet44's post |  #6

As well as using the right aperture to get dof remember that acceptable sharpness exists both in front and behind the actual point of focus. If you focus on the front row then the second row will be slightly less sharp and the third row even more so. However, if you focus on the second row instead, then row one and row three will both be about the same.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sch_photo
Member
172 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 09, 2012 08:25 |  #7

I agree with everything except the wide angle lens, well the term I would use is a standard length zoom. I use a 70-200 for individuals, and a 24-105 for the groups. Remember that the farter away you get from the group, the more it will "compress" the image Your DOF is definatly the reason for a lack of sharpness. I have shot an entire marching band from the other side of a football field at about f16 and had everyone tack sharp.


Equipment list: Canon 1Dx, Canon 1D mk III, 50D, 400mm 2.8L, 70-200mm 2.8L, 17-40 4.0L, 24-105 4.0L IS, Sigma 15mm 2.8 FE, (2) 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
burnet44
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,958 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 14344
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Robinson, Texas
     
May 09, 2012 08:40 |  #8

thanks you guys know better than me


Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
C and C welcome, Brutality Encouraged, Help Always Welcome Editing OK
www.firstdownphotos.ph​otoreflect.com (external link)
Flicker Page http://www.flickr.com/​photos/72506283@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
May 10, 2012 15:54 |  #9

You're so far away because you're having to be that far away to fit everyone in the shot. I would agree with rearranging them so they aren't spread so far apart.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Coach21
Member
156 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2008
     
May 10, 2012 15:59 |  #10

The suggestions I have are;

1. When I do team photos I try not to leave so much head room. I prefer more foreground so I can add text - team name, year, varsity or jv etc.

2. Make sure you use a tripod!

3. Use a remote to trigger the camera.

4. Put your camera in AV mode and choose 11 or 16 and that way everyone will be in focus.

Hope that helps and post the team photo if you get a chance.

Andy




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elrey2375
Thinks it's irresponsible
Avatar
4,992 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 279
Joined Nov 2011
     
May 10, 2012 16:22 |  #11

Cloudy is good. It means no harsh shadows. If you have a flash or preferably two, you could set them up for fill.


http://emjfotografi.co​m/ (external link)
http://500px.com/EMJFo​tografi (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RSB
Senior Member
317 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Carlsbad, CA
     
May 10, 2012 20:08 |  #12

1)You want 3 rows- front row sitting legs crossed, second row on 2 knees, and the third row standing.
2) Twenty six players/coaches works out to 9-8-9. Always have even/odd or odd/even rows so that you can pose players in the 2nd and 3rd rows the gaps between players in front of them. Always gap, never stack.
3) Do not think of a pyramid, think of a U. You want your shortest players in the front row, tallest players in the back row, and the shortest players in each row in the middle, with the tallest players in each row at the ends.
4) ^^^ Reread #3....Players in the front row, and players in the center of each row are closer to the camera. Players in the back row, and players on the ends of each row are farther from the camera. The closer to the camera a player is, the larger they will appear, the farther away, the smaller they will appear. Building a pyramid will exaggerate the effect, making the tall players in the middle look even taller, and the short players on the ends look even smaller.
5) Line the players up shortest to tallest, place the first player in the center of each row, then add 1 player to each side, back and forth, until you have the correct number of players in that row. Do the same for the other 2 rows.
6) I shoot backlit whenever possible, and use adequate fill. Keep in mind that you will need 600-800ws of flash to adequately fill a group this size in full sun.You won't get the job done with an on camera flash.
7) If you have enough flash output, in full sun, at ISO100, set your camera on manual 1/250th sec at f11. However, you may want to adjust your shutter speed to compensate for either a bright, or a dark or shadowed background. Focus on the middle player in the second row.


Randy Brister, Cr.Photog.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sch_photo
Member
172 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
May 10, 2012 23:24 |  #13

Coach21 wrote in post #14412148 (external link)
The suggestions I have are;

1. When I do team photos I try not to leave so much head room. I prefer more foreground so I can add text - team name, year, varsity or jv etc.

2. Make sure you use a tripod!

3. Use a remote to trigger the camera.

4. Put your camera in AV mode and choose 11 or 16 and that way everyone will be in focus.

Hope that helps and post the team photo if you get a chance.

Andy

#1: Personal preference
#2: Tripod for individuals, not for the team.
#3: Get real... this make zero sense
#4: Put your camera in manual and set everything yourself. NEVER, EVER, EVER let the camera pick a setting.


Equipment list: Canon 1Dx, Canon 1D mk III, 50D, 400mm 2.8L, 70-200mm 2.8L, 17-40 4.0L, 24-105 4.0L IS, Sigma 15mm 2.8 FE, (2) 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
May 11, 2012 09:27 |  #14

sch_photo wrote in post #14414113 (external link)
#1: Personal preference
#2: Tripod for individuals, not for the team.
#3: Get real... this make zero sense
#4: Put your camera in manual and set everything yourself. NEVER, EVER, EVER let the camera pick a setting.

I've told her that in other threads but she's not comfortable shooting in M. LAXmom - if you don't go out and buy that book (Understanding exposure) I'm gonna send you my friggen copy :p. I can't stress it enough - if you want to peruse photography what-so-ever, you need to learn to shoot in M. It's a game changer and you're only limiting your creativity by not figuring it out. And honestly, it's really easy once you understand the fundamentals. Google: exposure triangle in the meantime. Actually, I just did it for you and hilariously enough, this was the first result:

http://digital-photography-school.com …re-in-digital-photography (external link)

Go figure!


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LaxMom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
203 posts
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Virginia
     
May 11, 2012 09:53 |  #15

Aressem wrote in post #14415566 (external link)
I've told her that in other threads but she's not comfortable shooting in M. LAXmom - if you don't go out and buy that book (Understanding exposure) I'm gonna send you my friggen copy :p. I can't stress it enough - if you want to peruse photography what-so-ever, you need to learn to shoot in M. It's a game changer and you're only limiting your creativity by not figuring it out. And honestly, it's really easy once you understand the fundamentals. Google: exposure triangle in the meantime. Actually, I just did it for you and hilariously enough, this was the first result:

http://digital-photography-school.com …re-in-digital-photography (external link)

Go figure!

I actually went out yesterday to find it, and they didn't have a copy. I STILL plan on getting it, but will probably try Amazon. I DID however buy "Understanding Photography" by Bryan Peterson. It's not like I can't learn other aspects of photography too, so figured it would be useful too. But yes, I totally agree with you, I need to improve on exposure, and learning to shoot in M. But, I hate to experiment when I'm shooting for people. I don't want to get a whole bunch of crappy shots because I didn't do it right. I'd rather experiment with something new when it doesn't matter, and I'm just doing it for me. KWIM?


Canon Rebel XSi, Canon 70-200 lens
“ I always thought good photos were like good jokes. If you have to explain it, it just isn’t that good." – Anonymous

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,808 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
(another) question about team shots
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
736 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.