EF-S lens on 5D3

Wait, you want to upgrade because the 10-22 isn't wide enough for you?

No, I want to Upgrade. But why upgrade to the 5D3 if its not going to give me anything extra with its FF. Yeah its got loads of features but the biggy should be FF for me.

syburn wrote in post #14407574
Thansk for the response.

I was excited to upgrade way above my intended budget because I thought that with FF I would finaly be able to get a real 10-22mm shot without cropping (because I realy only shoot Interiors with any seriousness). Even if I decided to spend on a new lens as well as a new camera, seems I will not be able to get wider - find it almost beyond believe that Cannon dont have a 10-22mm type of lens for FF.

They do. It's called the EF 16-35. That is exactly the same range on a FF as the 10-22 is on a 1.6 crop. Exactly (ok 22mm is FF equivalent of 35.2mm on the long end).

Or if you really want wider there is the EF 8-15 Fisheye for $1499.00. Or you can pay $2,359.00 for the EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM. There are always options, but they don't come free.

syburn wrote in post #14407574
Thansk for the response.

I was excited to upgrade way above my intended budget because I thought that with FF I would finaly be able to get a real 10-22mm shot without cropping (because I realy only shoot Interiors with any seriousness). Even if I decided to spend on a new lens as well as a new camera, seems I will not be able to get wider - find it almost beyond believe that Cannon dont have a 10-22mm type of lens for FF.

There is a Sigma 12-24mm but but now feel im getting out of my depth in new kit when i have a very good lens already. Have to think about this.

Maybe do back to my 60D original idea. Ho-hum!

For 5d3 you can get Canon EF 8-15mm f4 L fisheye which is wider than 10-22 but it costs $1500.

syburn wrote in post #14407720
No, I want to Upgrade. But why upgrade to the 5D3 if its not going to give me anything extra with its FF. Yeah its got loads of features but the biggy should be FF for me.

FF will give you better image quality, noise control and depth of field than your current camera. Yes you will have to upgrade your lens also, but think of it like this, you probably won't be upgrading that lens for a very long time.

timnosenzo wrote in post #14405433
Yeah, I know it can be made to work - but IMO it doesn't make sense to modify a $700 lens to work in a fairly limited capacity (and can risk damaging a $3400 camera) when you could sell that lens and buy something like a 17-40 that is completely compatible.

i've got a 17-40 and 10-22, the 17-40 is a not a 10-22. It's good, but it's not that good.

rick_reno wrote in post #14408105
i've got a 17-40 and 10-22, the 17-40 is a not a 10-22. It's good, but it's not that good.

You're saying on a FF camera, an EF-S 10-22 is better than a 17-40?

My Tamron 10-24mm worked on my 5D2 down to about 13.5mm without a filter on it. IT took a tumble on my 40d, so now I have a Sigma 12-24 on my 5d2... hardly ever comes off.

Logicus wrote in post #14408137
My Tamron 10-24mm worked on my 5D2 down to about 13.5mm without a filter on it. IT took a tumble on my 40d, so now I have a Sigma 12-24 on my 5d2... hardly ever comes off.

How's the distortion on those two lenses?

I love wide...currently shooting FF with the 16-35L II, but wouldn't mind trying something wider (such as the Sigma)

syburn wrote in post #14404931
Getting worried now that my EF-s 10-22mm will not work on the 5D3. Is it true? Heard that it only causes vignetting from another source but isn't that easy to remove with software?

Have my upgrading dreams been dashed?

If so do they have an EF wide lens (arrgh the cost!)

I am actually confused by your request. Please don't be insulted, but I'm surprised to find that someone who is already a Canon user and has developed the skills to upgrade to a high end and expensive body like the 5D3 didn't know that Ef-S lenses are only compatible with cropped frame Canon bodies. I realize some folks don't want to be bothered by technical details, but using a high end camera like the 5D3 is all about technical details.

If you only shoot interiors seriously why not do the job properly and get a used 5D Mk11 and a 24mm TS-E.That should cost about the same as a 5DMk111 and will do a far better job for interiors-it what it is intended for

I bought my 350D 7 years ago when all this was new to me. So I have long since forgot about all those EF details as I have not needed a new lens all these years. And my interest is only in Interior photography for my job.

Hi trout fisher,

But a 24mm will be less wider than I currently use and I only photograph with a tripod using bracketed images.

syburn wrote in post #14408923
Hi trout fisher,

But a 24mm will be less wider than I currently use and I only photograph with a tripod using bracketed images.

Yes but you can shift the lens sideways and up and down and 24mm on FF gives the same FOV as 15mm on a crop,its more expensive but the 17mm ts-e on FF will give you the same FOV as 10mm on a crop,you will be able to shoot panoramas and resolve converging verticals very easily but remember TS-E lenses are manual focus only.
Before you go and spend lots of cash try hiring a TS-E to see how you get on with it

Welp, its possible. Some downtime at work:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …pacity4action/7​052184663/