8/10 for me, not bad HTC, the HTC still has the typical camera phone issues, but a lot better than phones of the past.
imjason Goldmember 1,667 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Jun 04, 2012 18:11 | #61 8/10 for me, not bad HTC, the HTC still has the typical camera phone issues, but a lot better than phones of the past. Canon gear: EOS M, Canonet QL17, SX230HS, S95, SD1200IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail making stuff up More info | Jun 04, 2012 18:49 | #62 imjason wrote in post #14531233 8/10 for me, not bad HTC, the HTC still has the typical camera phone issues, but a lot better than phones of the past. Agreed - for the intended purpose, they do more than is really expected. No one, even HTC I am sure, expects hobbies or pro photographers to give up their cameras for one of these. But for a person like my wife.... this is more than good enough.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MuahMan Senior Member 288 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jun 04, 2012 20:32 | #63 5/10 and I don't even know which ones. Bodies: Sony A7, Canon 6D,Canon G15/ Glass Zeiss 16-35, Zeiss 135, Zeiss FE 55 1.8, FE 35 2.8, FE 24-70 F4 OSS,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Justaddwata Goldmember 1,330 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Stralian - In Rhode IsIand More info | Jun 05, 2012 06:49 | #64 9/10 - be curious if the same person/photographer took both sets. Proudly Australian Made!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kronie Goldmember 2,183 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jun 05, 2012 07:00 | #65 9/10 here. But at that size it was just a guess really...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
10megapixel "I'm a little slow" 3,872 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Surrounded by Corn and Rednecks in Indiana More info |
Nathan Can you repeat the question, please? More info | Jun 05, 2012 21:17 | #67 Got 4/10. I'm not embarassed, though. 7/10 second time I took it, got some different photos. Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dngphoto Senior Member 384 posts Joined Nov 2011 More info | Jun 06, 2012 00:39 | #69 5/10, I could only tell on high iso high clipping shots...what am i missing as common tells. Low res isnt a fair arguement, its not exactly the pepsi challenge but still cool to test Sean - dngphoto&film 5dii Gripped / Σ 50 1.4 / Canon 28-135 USM / Σ 12-24 HSM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nathan Can you repeat the question, please? More info | Jun 06, 2012 13:22 | #70 Croasdail wrote in post #14495219 Got 7 out of 7 and then quit. For me it was the dof that gave it away or blown highlights on a couple. For average snap shots, a camera phone does just fine. I was one of the big critics of phones with cameras... But now I am glad the two have merged. For snap shot type stuff most are more than capable of doing the job. Scratches head. How do you know without completing it? Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Justaddwata Goldmember 1,330 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Stralian - In Rhode IsIand More info | Jun 07, 2012 01:28 | #71 Nathan wrote in post #14540478 Scratches head. How do you know without completing it? You dont!! Proudly Australian Made!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yno Senior Member 910 posts Likes: 93 Joined Jan 2008 Location: San Jose, California More info | I actually had a bit of a problem telling them apart! Image hosted by forum (600207) © Yno [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gilthanass Member 53 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Jun 11, 2012 08:43 | #73 I had some trouble telling for the same reason others did (got 4/10 and 6/10). The truth is, if you took some of my best phone shots and compared them to my worst camera shots, you'd think the phone was the camera every time, but that doesn't mean a damned thing. I didn't buy my camera because every shot was going to be better, I bought it to do the things my phone can't (and there weren't many of those shots thrown in). 40D | 17-85 IS USM | 70-200 F4.0L | Σ 10-20 4:5.6 | Σ 17-50 2.8 | 430EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Canon1969 Member 39 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Jun 14, 2012 21:26 | #74 Bottom-line is that whoever was shooting with the DSLR (read: HTC Mktg. Dept.) did a bad enough job that they are indeed a bit difficult to pick out. 5D Mark II (gripped) | 24-105mm f/4.0L IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 85mm f/1.2L IS II | 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moonshadow Member 184 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: manila More info | Jun 14, 2012 22:55 | #75 I got 4/10 first try, 10/10 on the 2nd try but some of them are guess work. Ronald │5DmkII / 7D / 24-70 2.8L / 70-200 f2.8LIS / 17-40 f4L / 35 1.4L / 135 f2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1426 guests, 112 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||