Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 13 May 2012 (Sunday) 19:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

24-105 f/4 vs 24-70 f/2.8 (for corporate / birthday party / wedding events)

 
5W0L3
Senior Member
998 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2012
     
May 13, 2012 19:51 |  #1

Which would you chose out of these two for events such as corporate parties, birthday parties, and weddings.

Does a person even end up shooting at f/2.8 during these events? As there are many group shots etc. so im assuming that most people would shoot the events (when using these lenses) at around f/4 - f/5.6 for maximum corner sharpness?


Manav
5D III x 2 (gripped) | 35L | 85L II | 100L | 24-70mm IIL | 70-200mm IIL | Some strobes & some speedlights.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gotak
Senior Member
949 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
May 13, 2012 20:18 |  #2

Yes you would use f2.8. There are always subject isolation shots especially for weddings. And of course for low light situations.

But you are also right that often you wouldn't shoot at f2.8 because you need more stuff in focus. However, an f2.8 lens can become an f4 an f4 cannot go to f2.8 unless you are harry potter.

That said the f4 24-105 is perfectly versatile for wedding and other events.


http://bubble-trees.com/ (external link)
7D x2,, 50 f1.8, 11-16 f2.8, 17-55 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS II, 100 2.8L, 430EX, 580EX, Di866, pixel king wireless TTL trigger.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agv8or
Goldmember
Avatar
2,157 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 364
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Midwest
     
May 13, 2012 21:12 |  #3

Once I bought my 24-105 I sold my 24-70. The focal range and IS trumps anything the 24-70 had to offer. Subject isolation at 2.8 rather than f/4 in this focal range is so subtle not to even notice. The 24-105 performs very well in dark venues and with a flash or a 5DmII/mIII it is not even an issue to bump the ISO up one or two stops.


Rand

Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gotak
Senior Member
949 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
May 13, 2012 21:40 |  #4

Low light performance really depends on the situation. I wouldn't blanket statement a bump of 1 to 2 stop of ISO is never going to be a problem because you have full frame. I have seen my sister's wedding photog using a 5D2 made her mother in law look like she's 80 (when she looks 40ish in real life) because the photog decides it wasn't a problem to bump ISO. End result are completely useless photos from inside the church.

When you have 1 stop more light you will find situations to use it. Whatever the body 1 stop less ISO to get the job done is always going to be beneficial to your final image quality.

Sure the IS on the 24-105 makes up for the difference by more than 1 stop but only if you are shooting still subjects. And that's not the case for events. Considering that when people are moving you are using 1/50 to 1/100 or so, be it the 24-105 or 24-70 1 stop less ISO might be quite a difference.


http://bubble-trees.com/ (external link)
7D x2,, 50 f1.8, 11-16 f2.8, 17-55 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS II, 100 2.8L, 430EX, 580EX, Di866, pixel king wireless TTL trigger.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
May 13, 2012 21:53 |  #5

I would never use the 24-105. It was never appealing to me. The IS makes it kinda of flexible, but implementation not the greatest. F4 is a deal killer. Dof is that not thin enough, and not enough speed in critical moments. I was shooting indoors with my 2.8 settings near maxed out, 1/30 ISO 3200 f2.8, and had I used the f4, I would have pushed ISO 6400...

1 stop performance is worth a lot and it costs a bit too.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 13, 2012 22:00 |  #6

Use your 35L.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5W0L3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
998 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2012
     
May 13, 2012 22:23 |  #7

bobbyz wrote in post #14427262 (external link)
Use your 35L.

yeah my 35L covers well when it comes to group shots, and wide shots (which is 75% of the shots in a party) but i feel its too wide for portraits, especially candids / headshots.

Maybe i should invest in 85L or 135L instead :lol:


Manav
5D III x 2 (gripped) | 35L | 85L II | 100L | 24-70mm IIL | 70-200mm IIL | Some strobes & some speedlights.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
erdons
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
May 14, 2012 02:46 as a reply to  @ 5W0L3's post |  #8

Get a 580 EX II shooting with hss paired with a 24-105 and u will love it...


5D Mark III|7D Mark II|60D|T3|24-70/f2.8|70-200/f2.8L MK II ||Canon Speedlite 600 EX RT|Canon Speedlite 580EXII|2x Alien Bee B800

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5W0L3
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
998 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2012
     
May 14, 2012 03:04 |  #9

erdons wrote in post #14428081 (external link)
Get a 580 EX II shooting with hss paired with a 24-105 and u will love it...

Can you elaborate on that a bit more.. what do you mean by hss?


Manav
5D III x 2 (gripped) | 35L | 85L II | 100L | 24-70mm IIL | 70-200mm IIL | Some strobes & some speedlights.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LucasCK
Senior Member
352 posts
Likes: 27
Joined May 2010
     
May 14, 2012 03:28 as a reply to  @ 5W0L3's post |  #10

high speed sync. When using a speedlight, HSS allows you to have high shutter speeds

Good for underexposing the background a tad and having your subject have alot of pop


5d4, 2x6d, 5d2, 24-70L II, Sigma 35A 1.4, Canon 70-200 2.8L II, 135 2.0L, 430ex2, 600ex-rt
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com (external link)
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com …ane-wedding-photographer/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LucasCK
Senior Member
352 posts
Likes: 27
Joined May 2010
     
May 14, 2012 03:31 as a reply to  @ LucasCK's post |  #11

I personally love flash photography indoors, gives you so much creativity and the speedlight helps you to focus a lot easier. And also lets you utilise a 24-105


5d4, 2x6d, 5d2, 24-70L II, Sigma 35A 1.4, Canon 70-200 2.8L II, 135 2.0L, 430ex2, 600ex-rt
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com (external link)
http://www.lucaskrausp​hotography.com …ane-wedding-photographer/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
evil3
Member
61 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Canada
     
May 14, 2012 20:12 |  #12

Pros for 24-70mm:
You can utilize the 1 stop faster lens by either lower your ISO by 1 stop with same shutter speed or keep the same ISO with twice faster shutter speed.

Pros for 24-105mm:
A little bit lighter.
The 70-105mm range.

Which lens to choose depends on your preference.

Personally, I am comfortable shooting f3.2 to f3.5 with 24-70mm. From 35mm to 50mm, f2.8 is very good.


My Flickr (external link)
5D MKII & III | EF20-35 f3.5-4.5 | EF70-200 f2.8II | Sigma 50 A | EF85 f1.8 | Voigtlander 40mm | EF28 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andy_dee
Member
154 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: USA
     
Jul 29, 2012 05:09 |  #13

Bumping to see what others have to say.

I'm using 24-70 and I shoot mostly corporate events, ie. conferences, presentations, seminars, etc.
In which case, a flash is generally not allowed, but in cases where it is I still use the same lens.

However, the problem is I can do carry another lens 70-200 if the venue requires me to. Which now makes me rethink about 24-105 might be a good option as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kin2son
Goldmember
4,546 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Jul 29, 2012 05:19 |  #14
bannedPermanent ban

andy_dee wrote in post #14784899 (external link)
Bumping to see what others have to say.

I'm using 24-70 and I shoot mostly corporate events, ie. conferences, presentations, seminars, etc.
In which case, a flash is generally not allowed, but in cases where it is I still use the same lens.

I take the extra stop on the 24-70 over the extra 35mm anyday. You'll never know what kind of (terrible) lighting you will run into...


5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
EOS M / EF-M 18-55 / EF-M 22f2 / Ricoh GR aka Ultimate street camera :p
Flickr (external link) | My Images on Getty®‎ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jimewall
Goldmember
1,871 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jul 29, 2012 10:41 as a reply to  @ kin2son's post |  #15

If I only carried one lens, I'd probably go for the 24-105 (and flash when allowed).

When I have my camera/s, I seldom have one lens. So really I'd go 24-70 and make up the missing 35mm distance (compared to the 24-105) by switching to a 70-200 lens (or using a longer lens on the second camera).
Sometimes the f/2.8 also needs flash. This is me.

You should use what works best for you (or what you think works best for you). Either lens can work.


Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,867 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
24-105 f/4 vs 24-70 f/2.8 (for corporate / birthday party / wedding events)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2762 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.