i'm tempted to get the 100 f2.8 during the current rebate period and curious if uv, polarizer or nd filters are necessary, or helpful in specific situations for macro photography.
thanks in advance.
mauimike Member 46 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: maui More info | May 16, 2012 04:24 | #1 i'm tempted to get the 100 f2.8 during the current rebate period and curious if uv, polarizer or nd filters are necessary, or helpful in specific situations for macro photography.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LordV Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006 More info | May 16, 2012 04:27 | #2 mauimike wrote in post #14439137 i'm tempted to get the 100 f2.8 during the current rebate period and curious if uv, polarizer or nd filters are necessary, or helpful in specific situations for macro photography. thanks in advance. Only filter I've used to any extent when shooting macro is a CPolariser filter and that's fairly rare - limited to over water shots or shooting natural light in strong sun. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gatorlink Senior Member 901 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Southern California More info | May 17, 2012 13:07 | #3 I think most people do not use filters on their macro lenses, but that doesn't mean you should not try it. I did not ever use a filter on my 100mm, and the lens was constantly getting dirty as a result. I find it more difficult (and scary, given the cost of accidentally raking a sand grain across it) to clean the lens directly than to clean a filter. When I upgraded to the 180L macro, I put a filter on it, and I have not found that the images are degraded to a noticeable degree. Moreover, when using it as a telephoto on hikes in the wilderness, I like the security of knowing the glass is protected. Ryan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks Brian and Ryan for your input. I have a 77mm B&W CP so I could get a step up ring for that. A UV filter for lens protection is good advice for me as I tend to go out hiking and to the beach.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 21, 2012 00:06 | #5 The only filter I ever use for macro is the CP one, and even that rarely unless something like water reflection is a real issue. It quite often does also help colors show up better, but at the same time it cuts the light down enough so that depth of field can be a problem. My first real camera was a Canon F1. That was a long time ago.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1036 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||