JoePhotoOnline wrote in post #10441024
He understands that. Doesn't answer his question.
A general card for general public should have your logo and contact on one side, and a photo on the other side that best represents your work.
Ok, sorry I misread his post. I see what he's asking now. But even if Joe Schmoe comes up and asks for a card, he's got some kind of photography in mind, and if you talk to Joe and ask him what he's needing, you should have a card that covers that. If you have decided to go with using multiple examples of your photography as one side of your card, like some have done.
But Joe Schmoe and others should have something specific in mind they want you to shoot? Just have to ask them. And if you are the type that shoots anything and everything then maybe this style of card ins't for you, as you might have way too many options to print on one side of a card? So then it becomes important to just design a good card.
And again, I don't have a problem with SOME business cards that use photography icons or graphics, if done well, but thats the key, a lot of what we're seeing on here aren't done well. If you think that your card has to have something photography graphic related for general purpose, and are hell bent about using it, it just has to be designed well, thats my only issue. I've seen many of the successful photographers business cards, without a photography related graphic on them, that are just designed well and work.
In the end, a business card is just one facet of your branding and marketing.