Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 19 May 2012 (Saturday) 13:55
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which one should I choose?"
55-250 IS II
4
10.5%
70-300 IS USM
14
36.8%
70-200 L F4
20
52.6%

38 voters, 38 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Future Spotter Looking for His Next Lens? Would You Like to Help?

 
Bogac ­ Erkan
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Ankara, Turkey
     
May 19, 2012 13:55 |  #1

Hi guys... I am sure that veterans here are quite familiar with the "Hi, my very first post here, which lens I should buy?" posts and I am sorry for bringing another of these into your consideration.

Yes, this is one these boring questions as well.

One of my hobbies is aviation and as I get my 550D, I now have the opportunity for some spotting. Sadly my kit only has a 18-55 IS. So I am planning to buy a zoom lens.

At first, my plan was to buy a 55-250. As I kept browsing amazon pages, decision process became a serious pain in the ass and I started feeling a total lostness. Each day I looked into more expensive lenses and things got complicated.

Here are my options:

55-250 IS II
70-300 IS USM
70-200 F4 USM

I checked the photo archives section and saw that all of these lenses produced great images. My favorite at the moment is 70-200 but I am not sure whether that focal lenght would be appropriate for spotting.

Looking forward for your recommendations and comments on the subject.

Thanks in advance for your guidance.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
May 19, 2012 14:11 |  #2

The 100-400 is the lens to get for this, but on a budget the 55-250 does quite nice for the money. Do you see yourself upgrading to some big white glas in the future once you haves saved more up? If so I would probably get the 55-250 for now. Otherwise another good choice on a budget would be the Tamron 70-300 VC.


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogac ­ Erkan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Ankara, Turkey
     
May 19, 2012 14:12 |  #3

I was planning to go for an extender when I have the money. But that's not going to be in the near future I'm afraid.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
May 19, 2012 14:30 |  #4

Bogac Erkan wrote in post #14455609 (external link)
My favorite at the moment is 70-200 but I am not sure whether that focal lenght would be appropriate for spotting.

Exactly what is "spotting" to you? To me it means observing severe weather situations. I'm certain that I don't understand your meaning of "spotting".

It would be helpful if we know what your subject size is and the expected distance from your camera to the subject. That way, we can help with a focal length recommendation.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogac ­ Erkan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Ankara, Turkey
     
May 19, 2012 14:39 |  #5

Sorry, you're right. What I meant by spotting is photographing airplanes. :)
Therefore my subject will definitely be airplanes landing or taking off. In terms of distance, its hard for me to tell, but something like 100+ meters will be all right I guess.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
May 19, 2012 14:47 |  #6

The longest lens you can afford will be ideal. Canon 100-400L, Sigma 120-400mm or 150-500 OS, or on a lower budget Canon 55-250 IS or Tamron 70-300mm. I wouldn't drop back to a 200mm lens, even if it is an "L".


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
May 19, 2012 14:59 |  #7

Save for the 100-400 and don't "settle" for shorter lens + TC.

The extra glass in adding a TC is a built in IQ hit.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogac ­ Erkan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Ankara, Turkey
     
May 19, 2012 15:02 |  #8

Sadly I can't afford 100-400L or the Sigma's you've mentioned. Tamron 100-300 seems an interesting choice though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
May 19, 2012 15:24 |  #9

Jay (FlyingPhotog) is probably your best resource on this forum for the info you're looking for.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogac ­ Erkan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Ankara, Turkey
     
May 19, 2012 15:33 |  #10

Thank you... I've already had a look to his site, and he has some great stuff.

It seems -400 or -500 lenses are out of my budget at the moment and I am an impatient person. Probably will go for the L.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
May 19, 2012 15:53 |  #11

200mm is pretty short for aircraft. If you can't afford the 400-500 at least get a 300mm.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
May 19, 2012 16:43 |  #12

tkbslc wrote in post #14455759 (external link)
The longest lens you can afford will be ideal. Canon 100-400L, Sigma 120-400mm or 150-500 OS, or on a lower budget Canon 55-250 IS or Tamron 70-300mm. I wouldn't drop back to a 200mm lens, even if it is an "L".

I agree, if you cannot afford the 100-400 then something like the 55-250IS will work, just crop it


for example, this is cropped 50% and you should be able to "spot" it

XSi (450D)
Canon 55-250IS
250mm (cropped)
1/1250


IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2602/4117657403_dce5c31013_z.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bogac ­ Erkan
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
53 posts
Joined May 2012
Location: Ankara, Turkey
     
May 19, 2012 16:47 |  #13

Thanks a lot for the advice and the sample. I've been browsing image library for some time and I got the impression that the L has a better IQ.

What do you think in terms of IQ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danjama
Senior Member
Avatar
326 posts
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Romford, England
     
May 19, 2012 17:19 as a reply to  @ Bogac Erkan's post |  #14

You should consider the Tamron 70-300VC or Canon 70-300.

Personally i found myself a cheap 100-300mm USM and cannot wait to test it at my first airshow of the year next week! Should be good as long as i stop down aperture for sharp results.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/danjamafotos/ (external link)
Canon T3i Gripped/100-300 4.5-5.6 USM/28-80 3.5-5.6/35-105 4.5-5.6 USM/18-55 3.5-5.6 IS/Helios 44-2 Manual/Miranda 28mm 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
May 19, 2012 17:25 |  #15

Bogac Erkan wrote in post #14456138 (external link)
Thanks a lot for the advice and the sample. I've been browsing image library for some time and I got the impression that the L has a better IQ.

What do you think in terms of IQ?

L is probably better, but you'll have to crop it way down because it is too short. The net result is worse images.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,310 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Future Spotter Looking for His Next Lens? Would You Like to Help?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1179 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.