Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 23 May 2012 (Wednesday) 15:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Monitor calibration, MPix icc profile and Lightroom

 
deronsizemore
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 23, 2012 15:16 |  #1

I'll start by saying I'm a very amateur photographer. I enjoy it, but mostly take pics of my daughter. I'm getting ready to order prints from Mpix and I want to ensure the final product is the same as what I'm seeing on my screen. I've never attempted to calibrate my monitor or anything like that and I have some questions.

1. On my Mac, if I go to Preferences > Displays > Color tab then I see a list of color profiles I can use/calibrate. If I check "show only profiles for this display" then it only shows "color LCD" as an option. So, should I just select "Color LCD" and Calibrate it? Or should I select a different one from the list?

2. I've downloaded MPix's ICC Profile from here: http://www.zenfolio.co​m/zf/pnp/mpix.aspx#icc​Profiles (external link)

I'm confused on what to do with it once I have it. I've added it to my "ColorSync" folder on my computer and see it as a color space option when I export photos from LightRoom to JPG, but is that all I need to do? Select that MPix color space and then export? Is there a way to preview what the final result will look like prior to sending it off to MPix?

I guess I'm just not making the connection here between the MPix color profile and calibrating my monitor so that it displays what the images will look like before print. Any help would be appreciated.


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
May 23, 2012 16:32 |  #2

1. When we talk about calibrating/profiling the monitor we are referring to using a hardware device that reads known colors on your screen, calculates the deviation from what they should be and creates a profile unique to your monitor. Software adjustments in which you try to calibrate by attempting to match color patches are rarely very accurate. The cost of hardware calibrators ranges from about $80 to several hundreds.
2. You use the Mpix profile to "softproof" your image. Softproofing is a process in which an application uses the printer profile and your monitor profile to display an approximation of what the print will look like. Lightroom 4 includes a softproofing function and for Lightroom 3 there is a plugin:
http://www.lightroom-plugins.com/ProofIndex​.php (external link)
Any edition of Photoshop or Picture Window Pro will do softproofing.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 23, 2012 20:47 |  #3

I'd suggest that you start out with ordering a few small prints of shots that "look good" on-screen.

When you get them back compare the prints, viewing them in good light.

The most common thing that people find is that the prints are "too dark", which actually means that the monitor Brightness is too high. Dialing the monitor Brightness down is a very good "first thing" to do with a new monitor.

If the colors look off, then you are looking at a monitor calibration system, a hardware/software combination that will create a "profile" that gets "read" by apps like Lightroom and Photoshop and, if you direct it to, the Canon Raw processing software Digital Photo Professional (DPP).

The printer profile, like tzalman says above, has to be used by a SoftProofing app. Lightroom can do this -- go to Lightroom Help for info on "soft proofing".

Like I said, you can start simple, do batches of small test prints, then decide how much farther to take things.

Check out the two "stickies" on color management:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=707058

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=296149


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deronsizemore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 24, 2012 09:18 |  #4

tzalman wrote in post #14475095 (external link)
1. When we talk about calibrating/profiling the monitor we are referring to using a hardware device that reads known colors on your screen, calculates the deviation from what they should be and creates a profile unique to your monitor. Software adjustments in which you try to calibrate by attempting to match color patches are rarely very accurate. The cost of hardware calibrators ranges from about $80 to several hundreds.
2. You use the Mpix profile to "softproof" your image. Softproofing is a process in which an application uses the printer profile and your monitor profile to display an approximation of what the print will look like. Lightroom 4 includes a softproofing function and for Lightroom 3 there is a plugin:
http://www.lightroom-plugins.com/ProofIndex​.php (external link)
Any edition of Photoshop or Picture Window Pro will do softproofing.

Thanks! About the software adjustment, yeah, I tried that yesterday with the built in OSX software for calibration and it didn't look right after calibration. It's way too difficult to match the color patches and images they give you or at least for me it was.

I have LR3, so I will take a look at that Plugin you linked to. I do want to upgrade to LR4 though, so that will make things easier.

I have PhotoShop and will take a look at the soft proofing there. I just hate editing photos one by one in Photoshop.

tonylong wrote in post #14476130 (external link)
I'd suggest that you start out with ordering a few small prints of shots that "look good" on-screen.

When you get them back compare the prints, viewing them in good light.

The most common thing that people find is that the prints are "too dark", which actually means that the monitor Brightness is too high. Dialing the monitor Brightness down is a very good "first thing" to do with a new monitor.

If the colors look off, then you are looking at a monitor calibration system, a hardware/software combination that will create a "profile" that gets "read" by apps like Lightroom and Photoshop and, if you direct it to, the Canon Raw processing software Digital Photo Professional (DPP).

The printer profile, like tzalman says above, has to be used by a SoftProofing app. Lightroom can do this -- go to Lightroom Help for info on "soft proofing".

Like I said, you can start simple, do batches of small test prints, then decide how much farther to take things.

Check out the two "stickies" on color management:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=707058

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=296149

That will most likely be the case with me. My monitor is at its brightest setting I believe. Thanks for your suggestions.

Question regarding the MPix icc file I downloaded. When I'm exporting from Lightroom, I have the option to select a color space. Should I select the MPix icc? Or leave it at SRGB? or what? I exported my photos using the MPix color space, but it appears now that doing that really doesn't do anything at all?


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 24, 2012 11:17 |  #5

deronsizemore wrote in post #14478146 (external link)
That will most likely be the case with me. My monitor is at its brightest setting I believe. Thanks for your suggestions.

Question regarding the MPix icc file I downloaded. When I'm exporting from Lightroom, I have the option to select a color space. Should I select the MPix icc? Or leave it at SRGB? or what? I exported my photos using the MPix color space, but it appears now that doing that really doesn't do anything at all?

Turn down your monitor brightness before you order any prints!

And, when you Export pics leave LR set to sRGB. Unless a print provider explicitely tells you to export in their ICC profile, export in sRGB. The ICC profile is only used to Soft Proof!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deronsizemore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 24, 2012 12:00 |  #6

tonylong wrote in post #14478666 (external link)
Turn down your monitor brightness before you order any prints!

And, when you Export pics leave LR set to sRGB. Unless a print provider explicitely tells you to export in their ICC profile, export in sRGB. The ICC profile is only used to Soft Proof!

Makes sense, Tony! Thanks again.

*runs to turn down monitor brightness*


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
May 25, 2012 03:19 |  #7

tonylong wrote in post #14478666 (external link)
Turn down your monitor brightness before you order any prints!

Down 50% in my case. No, I'm not joking, it really was.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
May 25, 2012 23:36 |  #8

Lowner wrote in post #14482446 (external link)
Down 50% in my case. No, I'm not joking, it really was.

Is that all? :confused: Mine is down quite a bit more than that - 80 cd/m2. And it still seems a bit bright.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
May 26, 2012 04:38 |  #9

Titus213 wrote in post #14486201 (external link)
Is that all? :confused: Mine is down quite a bit more than that - 80 cd/m2. And it still seems a bit bright.

Same here. 13% on the monitor's scale in order to bring it down to 90 cd/m^.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dfigs
Member
31 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
May 26, 2012 18:11 |  #10

Thank you to everyone for sharing their knowledge on these questions (and to the OP for starting the thread, ;)). I am in nearly the exact same situation and greatly appreciate the info!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deronsizemore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 31, 2012 20:25 |  #11

Lowner wrote in post #14482446 (external link)
Down 50% in my case. No, I'm not joking, it really was.

Dang! 50%? I turned mine down and it just looks too weird for me. Guess I'll have to turn it down when editing pics and back up for other stuff.

Dfigs wrote in post #14489030 (external link)
Thank you to everyone for sharing their knowledge on these questions (and to the OP for starting the thread, ;)). I am in nearly the exact same situation and greatly appreciate the info!

You're welcome. Glad it's been of use to you.


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Jun 01, 2012 03:45 |  #12

deronsizemore wrote in post #14513733 (external link)
Dang! 50%? I turned mine down and it just looks too weird for me. Guess I'll have to turn it down when editing pics and back up for other stuff.

Trust us, you can get used to it being at "normal" rather than eye harming levels! And each monitor needs different adjustments, note that one here was down to just 13% of maximum. Why anyone wants the monitor set to 100% I just don't understand.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jun 01, 2012 13:28 |  #13

It took several days to get used to the lower levels but now as Richard says - full on bright hurts the eyes.

I could light several rooms of the house at that 100%.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deronsizemore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jun 01, 2012 13:32 |  #14

Lowner wrote in post #14515073 (external link)
Trust us, you can get used to it being at "normal" rather than eye harming levels! And each monitor needs different adjustments, note that one here was down to just 13% of maximum. Why anyone wants the monitor set to 100% I just don't understand.

Well, I don't understand why anyone wants their monitor set to 13% of maximum! :shock: So there! j/k

How do I know how much is good enough in regard to turning the brightness down? And lets say I turn it down to 50% of full brightness (I'm on a Macbook Pro), I assume that will make a lot of my images seem darker than they did before, so then will I need to go in and adjust the brightness again to correct what dimming my monitor did?

Titus213 wrote in post #14516971 (external link)
It took several days to get used to the lower levels but now as Richard says - full on bright hurts the eyes.

I could light several rooms of the house at that 100%.

Yeah, I'll just have t set it and force myself to get used to it. I'll give it a shot.


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jun 01, 2012 13:57 |  #15

A darker monitor should make you photo processing brighter - the opposite of the bright monitor causing dark prints.

But I always check the histogram.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

18,764 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Monitor calibration, MPix icc profile and Lightroom
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
503 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.