Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 23 May 2012 (Wednesday) 23:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Beginner...Please C & C

 
tbsguy18
Member
Avatar
230 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2012
Location: Michigan
     
May 23, 2012 23:47 |  #1

Just a few pictures I took of my daughter this past weekend. I've only been doing this for a few months, and I figured the next step would be to get some insight and advice. These were taken in our backyard, no flash, just using a reflector to bounce some light. The one of her in the chair was just the light coming in thru the window...it just worked out. Any thoughts?

IMAGE: http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff362/jaker182/Brooklyn_016copy.jpg
IMAGE: http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff362/jaker182/Brooklyn_011copy.jpg
IMAGE: http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff362/jaker182/Brooklyn_009copy.jpg
IMAGE: http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff362/jaker182/IMG_1867.jpg
IMAGE: http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff362/jaker182/IMG_0937.jpg
IMAGE: http://i1232.photobucket.com/albums/ff362/jaker182/Brooklyn_010copy.jpg

Gripped Canon 60D 50 f/1.8---17-50 f/2.8---70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,983 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 24, 2012 01:20 |  #2

What a beautiful little blue-eyed girl you have. In all but #5 she looks too bright, so you might try reducing exposure in those. Hopefully you shot in RAW so you will have an easier time of adjusting exposure after the fact.
Did you do any post processing? IF not then you might sharpen them too.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hardrock40
Senior Member
Avatar
467 posts
Joined Mar 2012
     
May 24, 2012 02:12 |  #3

I like 5 the best. Sort of a shy pose and I get whats she is thinking, if that makes sence.

I'm new to this also, so I am interested in what the pro's think on the lighting. I took some the other day with to many face shadows, now you have no shadows, so I'm torn with it.

Personally I think I like a little shadow on the face here and there, but I haven't accomplished that yet.

I wouldn't think your a beginner. At first I thought too bright, but now after looking at them for some time I'm not sure. So no help from me.

Maybe the pros will help.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tbsguy18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
230 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2012
Location: Michigan
     
May 24, 2012 02:28 as a reply to  @ Hardrock40's post |  #4

Thanks for the input!

I played with the brightness/contrast and exposure a bit in Photoshop. I brightened them up because on the computer I was editing with, they looked too dark. But now that I'm back on my computer, they look too bright! Lol. So maybe they were fine to begin with? I'm gonna blame the monitor (but only slightly). I haven't really shot much in RAW, but I'm thinking of changing that. And I will definitely sharpen them up!

The fifth image is completely untouched, as is. I think it turned out the best and its my favorite. Funny how that works...


Gripped Canon 60D 50 f/1.8---17-50 f/2.8---70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,983 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 24, 2012 08:28 |  #5

It's a good idea to check your histogram. When you see a lot of colors bunched up on the right margin then you are too bright. The little triangle in the upper right also tells you that you have crossed the blow-out line.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/05/4/LQ_597512.jpg
Image hosted by forum (597512) © Qbx [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
plawren53202
Member
180 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
May 24, 2012 15:45 |  #6

I think these shots are a great start. I agree with comments on the overexposure. It also looks to me that the outdoor shots are a little out of focus (the indoor shot is nice and crisp though). Two possible culprits: with a shallow DOF and closeup subject, your autofocus may be locking in on the wrong focus point, instead of the eyes where you want it; or, since you are relying on entirely natural light, your shutter speed may be a little too slow and you are getting some blurring from camera shake.


My quite modest little gear list: 50D gripped | 135L | 50 1.4 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 28-105 3.5-4.5 | Speedlite 420EX | 2 Yongnuo 460ii | stands, 2 umbrellas, one softbox
http://www.facebook.co​m/TreyLawrencePhotogra​phy (external link)
http://www.zenfolio.co​m/treylawrencephotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeifHurst
Member
153 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
     
May 24, 2012 15:49 |  #7

Qbx wrote in post #14477946 (external link)
It's a good idea to check your histogram. When you see a lot of colors bunched up on the right margin then you are too bright. The little triangle in the upper right also tells you that you have crossed the blow-out line.

Great post!

When shooting light skinned subjects check your red channel specifically. If it's pushed out to the far right (especially if it's peaked at the extreme far right) you're losing detail and color in the skin tones.


Gripped Canon 7D | Gripped Canon 5D2 | 50mm f1.4 | 24-70L f2.8 | 24-105L f4 | 70-200L f2.8 IS II | 24L f1.4 | 85L II f1.2 | Too much lighting gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tbsguy18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
230 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2012
Location: Michigan
     
May 24, 2012 16:32 as a reply to  @ LeifHurst's post |  #8

I definitely think it was autofocusing on the wrong focus point. I'm gonna go check the original files and see what my shutter speed was at as well. Thanks for all the advice! This is great.

What would you suggest is the best way to fix being over exposed? Thanks again!


Gripped Canon 60D 50 f/1.8---17-50 f/2.8---70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tbsguy18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
230 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2012
Location: Michigan
     
May 24, 2012 16:36 |  #9

Just check my shutter speed. They we're all at 1/250 and f/2. So i'm thinking it was an autofocus issue. Thanks again!!


Gripped Canon 60D 50 f/1.8---17-50 f/2.8---70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
plawren53202
Member
180 posts
Joined Apr 2012
     
May 24, 2012 16:49 |  #10

Yeah, at 1/250, shutter speed would not be an issue. Do you have your autofocus set up so that it just focuses on one point (e.g, the middle focus point)? If you have it where it can pick between any of the 7 or 9 AF points, it won't always focus where you want. That can be an issue when you are shooting at f/2 up close.


My quite modest little gear list: 50D gripped | 135L | 50 1.4 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 28-105 3.5-4.5 | Speedlite 420EX | 2 Yongnuo 460ii | stands, 2 umbrellas, one softbox
http://www.facebook.co​m/TreyLawrencePhotogra​phy (external link)
http://www.zenfolio.co​m/treylawrencephotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tbsguy18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
230 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2012
Location: Michigan
     
May 24, 2012 17:02 |  #11

Yea I had it set so it would be between the different AF points. Didn't even realize it lol. Thanks for pointing that out!


Gripped Canon 60D 50 f/1.8---17-50 f/2.8---70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
May 24, 2012 20:38 |  #12

Even with f/2, it may be difficult for you to focus on her eyes when she is so close to the camera. She could be moving around as well as your camera throwing off the very shallow DOF that f/2 offers. Try shooting something that is not moving where you can test how accurate focusing is instead of a young, probably energetic, girl.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tbsguy18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
230 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2012
Location: Michigan
     
May 25, 2012 03:39 |  #13

Yea, she is definitely energetic lol. I'll definitely try on a still subject next time.


Gripped Canon 60D 50 f/1.8---17-50 f/2.8---70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,331 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Beginner...Please C & C
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1081 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.